Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Food For Though

Food For Though

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comalgorithms
14 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W W Balboos GHB

    I subscribe to a number of online medical sites (MD-oriented). One pointed out a rather interesting concept that is all-too-relevant in today's world: ". . . no one demands randomized clinical trials of parachutes." Make of it what you will (I find it profound in its simplicity) - it's actually something to consider in long-term decision making and not just in today's obvious context.

    Ravings en masse^

    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PIEBALDconsult
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Exactly. No one way of testing (or developing or documenting) "things" is appropriate for all types of things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W W Balboos GHB

      You fail to abstract the concept (i.e., a long term utilization). As for "is the parachute to blame" idea - I think that's more an apples and oranges than what I posted. The point is to use good judgement as to weighing risks vs. the absolute verifiability of "Proof of Concept". Probably because of my rather heavy science background, but results are almost invariably given with error-bars. That is a measure of certainty, and obviously, uncertainty, in how likely one is able to duplicate the results (what, in fact, equates to duplication of a claim). Unfortunately turning directly to the vaccine concept: they best of them were given ca. 95% effectiveness in preventing the disease. That means 5% will, in fact, get the disease: breakthrough infections. The media hype of these breakthroughs is ridiculous in that it was already part of the description . . . a given. Even those in the 5% group apparently benifit greatly from the extreme reduction in the seriousness of the illness. But the point of real interest - hundreds of millions of vaccinations given with virtually no ill effects - certainly in light of the alternative situation that existed - should give one cause to consider the true cost/benefit ratio:   risk of vaccination vs. risk of none. In my personal point of view, we've actually had a huge Phase III trial - the clearly observable outcomes of those who have and those who have not been vaccinated. You can choose to believe the results or not. Human nature, unfortunately, tends to "herd" people towards believing primarily what they want to hear.* * And that can be applied to me and my above reply, can it not?

      Ravings en masse^

      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

      S Offline
      S Offline
      SeeSharp2
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

      risk of vaccination vs. risk of none.

      Hard to know for sure. There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated. I don't remember the details.

      W S D M 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S SeeSharp2

        W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

        risk of vaccination vs. risk of none.

        Hard to know for sure. There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated. I don't remember the details.

        W Offline
        W Offline
        W Balboos GHB
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        SeeSharp2 wrote:

        There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100%

        One of our current era's greatest problems - "you read it somewhere" - That could be very interesting, or made up, or true-ish, leaving out important facts that can cast an entirely different light on the report. Just the way things have become. But that aside, I can point out that in the US (Mainly Pizer, then Moderna and J&J), the vast majority of cases in the what I'd call "anti-vax" states are the unvaccinated and, when you move on to hospitalization, it's all but exclusively the unvaccinated. The real point (to me) has always been not 100% protection from catching it but essentially 100% protection from getting very sick from it. That's where I put my money.

        Ravings en masse^

        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

        "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W W Balboos GHB

          SeeSharp2 wrote:

          There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100%

          One of our current era's greatest problems - "you read it somewhere" - That could be very interesting, or made up, or true-ish, leaving out important facts that can cast an entirely different light on the report. Just the way things have become. But that aside, I can point out that in the US (Mainly Pizer, then Moderna and J&J), the vast majority of cases in the what I'd call "anti-vax" states are the unvaccinated and, when you move on to hospitalization, it's all but exclusively the unvaccinated. The real point (to me) has always been not 100% protection from catching it but essentially 100% protection from getting very sick from it. That's where I put my money.

          Ravings en masse^

          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

          S Offline
          S Offline
          SeeSharp2
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

          - "you read it somewhere"

          :laugh: Too true. But that's essentially where all of our "knowledge" comes from.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S SeeSharp2

            W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

            risk of vaccination vs. risk of none.

            Hard to know for sure. There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated. I don't remember the details.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Slow Eddie
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            In the U.S. almost 100% ofthe people dying, or severly affected by Covid, including the 5 variant, are those not vaccinated. ABC Nightly News. Also 99% of those severly affected, to a person, said they wished they'd been vaccinated. I don't know what's going on in the UK, but, short of a bad batch of the vacine, or placebo innoculations, I have trouble believing that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

              Plus, the use of "placebo parachutes" is going to be ... um ... unpopular :~

              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Slow Eddie
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Liked the way you dropped that one in!:cool:

              Repo Man

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S SeeSharp2

                W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

                risk of vaccination vs. risk of none.

                Hard to know for sure. There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated. I don't remember the details.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                DerekT P
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                That's hardly surprising, in fact it's inevitable. In the extreme case, 100% of the population will be vaccinated, and in some localities, it's already close to that now. So of those who fall into that "5%" (for whom vaccination does not prevent covid), 100% of them will have been vaccinated. But as a result of vaccination, the number of people who got Covid is 1/20th what it would have been without.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W W Balboos GHB

                  I subscribe to a number of online medical sites (MD-oriented). One pointed out a rather interesting concept that is all-too-relevant in today's world: ". . . no one demands randomized clinical trials of parachutes." Make of it what you will (I find it profound in its simplicity) - it's actually something to consider in long-term decision making and not just in today's obvious context.

                  Ravings en masse^

                  "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                  "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Super Lloyd
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  You got that right! Those government goon got us! I am going to stop using parachutes effective immediately!! :mad: :laugh: (I think I'll be fine, I never jumped out of a perfectly working plane yet!)

                  A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W W Balboos GHB

                    I subscribe to a number of online medical sites (MD-oriented). One pointed out a rather interesting concept that is all-too-relevant in today's world: ". . . no one demands randomized clinical trials of parachutes." Make of it what you will (I find it profound in its simplicity) - it's actually something to consider in long-term decision making and not just in today's obvious context.

                    Ravings en masse^

                    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    englebart
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    SPCA is still protesting the use of animals in parachute trials. I know I read that somewhere. If I recollect it was write above the POST button.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S SeeSharp2

                      W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:

                      risk of vaccination vs. risk of none.

                      Hard to know for sure. There was just an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated. I don't remember the details.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mngerhold
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      SeeSharp2 wrote:

                      an article a couple of weeks ago that 100% of people in someplace in the UK that had recently gotten COVID were vaccinated

                      You may be referring to the recent statement by Patrick Vallance - see here COVID-19: Vallance corrects mistake to say 60% of people being admitted to hospital with coronavirus are unvaccinated | UK News | Sky News[^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups