Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I wish to meet all of the people who say "math is useless to programmers"

I wish to meet all of the people who say "math is useless to programmers"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++questioncareer
55 Posts 39 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Amarnath S

    The first thing I learnt about programming, way back in 1986, was the numerical solution of an equation by the Newton-Raphson method. Later on, implemented the computation of Bessel Functions, Hankel Transforms and solution of Integral Equations, all in Fortran.

    D Offline
    D Offline
    dshillito
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    That was also my first program, also in Fortran, but 18 years earlier - in 1968. It was the simple case of finding the square root. Luckily it worked first time, which encouraged me to continue.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D den2k88

      And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

      GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

      F Offline
      F Offline
      Fabio Franco
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Now imagine how much you'd bang your head if you never had exposure to those. Knowledge is never lost, just dormant. You can rest assured if you didn't have any exposure, your life would be a lot harder now.

      To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Fabio Franco

        Now imagine how much you'd bang your head if you never had exposure to those. Knowledge is never lost, just dormant. You can rest assured if you didn't have any exposure, your life would be a lot harder now.

        To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia

        D Offline
        D Offline
        den2k88
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        I wouldn't have got the job at all :D

        GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nemanja Trifunovic

          Interesting. The only math I ever used as a software developer is some pretty basic statistics. And I hated statistics as a student :D

          utf8-cpp

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Leo56
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          ..and even the 'basic' statistics are beyond our managers.... :sigh:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D den2k88

            I need things much more advanced than what I did in school. From when I analyzed images in real time to find anomalies to when I wrote the algorithm to have a humanoid robot walk, up to now that I simply have to drive pumps and fans.

            GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lorenzo Bertolino
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Yeah, sure, it's just that I don't think that since there are some programmers that make chemistry software we should all learn chemistry, same thing for maths or music for people that make DAWs. I don't have your job ;P and if I did.. I would probably be of the same idea, I didn't learn CUDA at school, now I need it and learnt it, it would be absurd to think that school would have had to teach it to me. :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D dshillito

              That was also my first program, also in Fortran, but 18 years earlier - in 1968. It was the simple case of finding the square root. Luckily it worked first time, which encouraged me to continue.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Les mt
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Yes, that was exactly my experience, same year and given the same problem :) (different college, and possibly a different country). At the same time we were introduced to the programmable calculator an Olivetti P101 with 240 bytes of RAM and told this was the future so learn to use it. I never did any other exercise on it than solving a quadratic, it kept on breaking down. After graduating we used HP65's and finally in 1975 my bosses wanted data gathered and pre-processed at the point of data collection (underwater for offshore applications) so it was "Hello" to processors like the Intel 8008 and later the Z80. The electronics module of my physics degree came into play and I had to learn to program in assembler, fortunately I was able to get away with integer arithmetic. In my experience maths is an integral part of life, saying you don't need maths IMO is like saying you don't need to be able to write - you can get by but what a hindrance.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rich Leyshon

                Since I can't figure out superscripting, please read B^2 as B squared ... Let A = B Multiply both sides by B: AB = B^2 Add B^2 to each side: AB + B^2 = 2B^2 Subtract 2AB from each side: B^2 - AB = 2B^2 -2AB (B^2 - AB ) = 2*(B^2 - AB) 1 = 2 QED.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rich Shealer
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Division by zero will do that to you. BB-AB = 0

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D den2k88

                  And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                  GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  agolddog
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  At least it sounds as if you have one of the rare development jobs which is actually interesting.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D den2k88

                    And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                    GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TNCaver
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    And that's the reason I don't have a job like yours. :laugh: My programming jobs have been all in the music industry, or now, banking. I use descrete maths and the occasional easy algebra. Like golf, Calculus in all its forms are great spectator sport, but I've little interest in actually playing the game.

                    If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A agolddog

                      At least it sounds as if you have one of the rare development jobs which is actually interesting.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      den2k88
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      Meh, it's producing firmware for motors... with only a single application (maybe two). It's mostly engineering the system as to lower reaction times, improve thermal and power efficiency, reduce noise and EM emissions... Not the most interesting job I held but its perks are elsewhere (i.e. twice the pay and a third of commute distance).

                      GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D den2k88

                        And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                        GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bruce Patin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        I was once asked to do a chi-square analysis. I still don't know how to do that. Not part of statistics for physics So, I just computed averages, which were good enough to get the job done.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D den2k88

                          And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                          GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Steve Naidamast
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          Any developer who does not have a good grounding in Algebra will never go very far in their career...

                          Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Amarnath S

                            The first thing I learnt about programming, way back in 1986, was the numerical solution of an equation by the Newton-Raphson method. Later on, implemented the computation of Bessel Functions, Hankel Transforms and solution of Integral Equations, all in Fortran.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            matblue25
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            Mine was Euler angles in Fortran. Part of a program to test inertial guidance units for aircraft. That was nothing but math and physics.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                              Maximilien wrote:

                              I always start at 1+1 and work my way from there

                              How hard could that possibly be? The Universe of Discourse : 1+1=2[^] :laugh:


                              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Matt Bond
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              2 & 2 = 22 2 + 2 = 4 Just saying. P.S. This only makes sense if you are speaking like an American. Many will use "and" instead of "plus" when adding.

                              Bond Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere

                              Richard DeemingR L 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • M Matt Bond

                                2 & 2 = 22 2 + 2 = 4 Just saying. P.S. This only makes sense if you are speaking like an American. Many will use "and" instead of "plus" when adding.

                                Bond Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere

                                Richard DeemingR Offline
                                Richard DeemingR Offline
                                Richard Deeming
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                Actually, it only makes sense if you're speaking Visual Basic. In any sensible language, 2 & 2 == 2. ;P


                                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D den2k88

                                  And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                                  GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  sasadler
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  Riiiight, I didn't use any math in all the DSP code I wrote for embedded audio devices. Or for the IEEEish floating point package I wrote for an industrial controller language (looong time ago!). Yep, didn't need math for any of it. About the only opinions from non-programmers I pay attention too are in regards to how an application looks and interacts with the user.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D den2k88

                                    And give them a day of my current job, for which I am rewieving trigonometry, Fourier transforms, Laplace transforms, studying Clarke's and Park's transforms and generaly banging my head against the whole mathematics syllabus I alread beaten into submission during my Engineering student days (which are long gone and the knowledge faded).

                                    GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    Gary R Wheeler
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    I have long said that, while I took 32 hours of college math (calculus, differential equations, and matrix algebra), I've since recycled that part of my brain to store old movie dialogue. Much more useful.

                                    Software Zen: delete this;

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Matt Bond

                                      2 & 2 = 22 2 + 2 = 4 Just saying. P.S. This only makes sense if you are speaking like an American. Many will use "and" instead of "plus" when adding.

                                      Bond Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Luschan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      You're right about the usage of 'and' instead of 'plus' by americans. Considering this, how do you come to "2 & 2 (which is 2 plus 2) = 22" ? I don't get it. I might be slow this morning...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups