Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Web Development
  3. ASP.NET
  4. Initial design question on an ASP.NET Core MVC project.

Initial design question on an ASP.NET Core MVC project.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved ASP.NET
asp-netquestioncsharpcssdotnet
1 Posts 1 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    nstk
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I am starting on a project, together with other developers. The customer is a community and wants to have a website where people can apply for a service. According to their family status, the persons are being distinguished into cases, i.e. married, divorced, living together with a partner, widow. For every case there exist some different questions, although most of them are common (like bitrhday place, father name and so on). The technology used is ASP.NET Core MVC. The one proposition is to make a model, a controller and a view for every family status. The name of the classes should accordingly change, like MarriedModel.cs, MarriedController.cs, or DivorcedModel.cs, DivorcedController.cs etc. My approach is a more OOP one. Since we have an entity of a Person, this is our model class. Family status, liked married, divorced etc, consists an attribute. The actions should change dynamically passing the attribute parameter into the controller which would control the view appropriate. I find that this way we avoid redundancy and code copying, which is very bad enginnering. Moreover we have less code in the end. Others say that with the first way we would gain on flexibility in case something changes during developement. What do you think?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups