Whats the point in being able to import Github repositories when its just going to be closed.
-
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
-
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
clwprogrammer wrote:
Do I sound like a petulant child,
A bit, but don't worry about it. I'm assuming you mean "Custom Dialogs"? I remember it and was one of those who voted "Unclear or incomplete" because ... well, it was. As presented to us, it was 4 sentences (all short), 5 bullet points, a link, and a small chunk of usage example code with two pictures. That's not a lot: it doesn't explain how it works, why it works, why it's better than any alternatives, it doesn't even act as a manual so I could pick it up and run with it without having to hunt like crazy to work out what iot could do for me, and how I'd make it do that. So that's why I voted "Unclear or incomplete" - not because "I think it's garbage" but because a "normal user" can't read it and start working: there is way too much background that they just wouldn't have without a fair amount of searching through your repository. Unfortunately, the "Project" classification doesn't allow for "in moderation" discussions, but basically, the requirements for a Project are pretty much the same as those for an Article, while a Tip can be a damn sight simpler. That may explain why you have "seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved" - Tips are a lot simpler and "quicker" than a Project or Article. Please, look at some of the existing articles here to get an idea of the standard we expect. Here's one of mine: Using struct and class - what's that all about?[^] And here's a tip which is a lot more "code focussed": Converting a List to a DataTable[^] We moderators aren't here to make your life difficult, or to be nasty - quite the reverse, we protect the site from not-ready articles, and authors from the derision and downvotes that poorer articles can receive. And to be a moderator, you have to write articles, so we know what it feels like when you slave away on something and Joe Moron from Stupidity High School, Kansas finds out it's not what he needs to hand in as his homework ... :laugh: If we let your origin
-
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
Your thread title and content do not match. Please give a link to your article so that we can have a look and comment about it. If it is good enough, we can approve it.
-
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
clwprogrammer wrote:
I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around
My first article was is a disaster. Frustrated like hell. PIEBALD was not happy with my effort. I kept improving it based on his comments and learned a lot. It's still visible, and I won't take it down either. Mr. PIEBALD kept insisting I improve; as if I could do better. Three times MVP by now, so he was right. Try again. And again. They're patient and will help you if you ask :thumbsup:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
Articles are as much about the development process as they are about the code. A few bullet points and an image or two do not really qualify as an article. Instead of seeing it as a withering attack, use the criticism to do it better. I've actually changed code after I started writing the article because trying to explain something to someone else often brings flaws to light.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
I have always respected opinions and such here. I have been a member for many years even. I have always thought highly of most everyone here. With that being said, I am very frustrated with the approval system for an article to syick around. I have seen stuff that is even less explained than my own recent attempt be approved. Apparently i havent explained well enough about a library I recently wrote and am continuing to work on. I know people wont care either way, but I will most likely be leaving the website altogether. I do believe that my listing was explained well enough to be able to stay. Do I sound like a petulant child, probably, but I dont care. I am 39 uears old and am allowed to feel and act how I want.
CLWPROGRAMMER
Can a member of staff please delete my message. I dont think i can do so once it has replies. You see, I dont write articles. I am not good at putting my thoughts to words at all. This is why i only give a brief overview. I only wanted to share the library. I have deleted all of my uploads and will no longer fret on it.
CLWPROGRAMMER
-
Can a member of staff please delete my message. I dont think i can do so once it has replies. You see, I dont write articles. I am not good at putting my thoughts to words at all. This is why i only give a brief overview. I only wanted to share the library. I have deleted all of my uploads and will no longer fret on it.
CLWPROGRAMMER
clwprogrammer wrote:
Can a member of staff please delete my message. I dont think i can do so once it has replies. You see, I dont write articles. I am not good at putting my thoughts to words at all.
I wasn't either.
clwprogrammer wrote:
This is why i only give a brief overview. I only wanted to share the library.
Then you got more than you wanted. You've put effort in the library. So, yes, I'd like to hear about how you done it. What was the reason to write it? What problem does it solve? How? You can answer those questions? Write it down, even if you think no one wants to read it. Because they do. And they download the code, use it in their own projects. Get up. Try again. I'll look at both code and article.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Articles are as much about the development process as they are about the code. A few bullet points and an image or two do not really qualify as an article. Instead of seeing it as a withering attack, use the criticism to do it better. I've actually changed code after I started writing the article because trying to explain something to someone else often brings flaws to light.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013#realJSOP wrote:
trying to explain something to someone else often brings flaws to light.
similar to the Rubber Ducky process, which I use often for the same reason. I have solved many issues and problems by just talking about it out load.
-
Articles are as much about the development process as they are about the code. A few bullet points and an image or two do not really qualify as an article. Instead of seeing it as a withering attack, use the criticism to do it better. I've actually changed code after I started writing the article because trying to explain something to someone else often brings flaws to light.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013I've found that starting to write an article usually triggers a new phase of code refinement. When my explanation becomes too wordy and complex, I find myself returning to the code to remove complexity so I don't have to write so much about it. It results in better code and a more readable article. It sometimes requires changing design fundamentals and deep refactoring but I've got used to that now.
-
#realJSOP wrote:
trying to explain something to someone else often brings flaws to light.
similar to the Rubber Ducky process, which I use often for the same reason. I have solved many issues and problems by just talking about it out load.
I call it "talking to the dogs".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
