"Did you come as a potential student, or as a teacher?"

charlieg

Comment 1: python statement is spot on. You might not like python, or JS or whipped cream, but when in Rome... Comment 2: catching bugs is very expensive when you find it in production is NONSENSE. The waterfall method came from systems engineering - really big systems. So, if you're designing something like a B2 Spirit or an F22 Raptor - finding a "bug" is more of a systems requirement failure. We're talking the entire system, not software. The problem with applying waterfall to s/w development is that waterfall's roots come from system engineering, and most software really does not play in that realm. Software's problem is that it is so flexible, you are making something to solve a problem that the customer cannot really grasp. So, you need to get something in front of them as quickly as possible - hence extreme/agile development approaches.

Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

Lost User

You make some good points, thanks :)

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Lost User

charlieg wrote:

Not enough context... without reading the replies, I'm thinking too much crack

A crack in what? It's the result from another post; I'm considering going back to school. More education isn't going to set me back, is it? :)

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

charlieg

lol, I was referring to the ubiquitous illegal drug - your post seemed to be the ramblings of a madman or a review of a bad interview :)

Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

Sander Rossel

I write the spec, "1 + 1 = 3". You proofread and point out the error. Bug caught ;)

Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

Richard Andrew x64

That wouldn't be a bug, that would be a design flaw. :)

The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

Lost User

charlieg wrote:

your post seemed to be the ramblings of a madman

That's part of my nature. I'm blessed with being naturally confused. English isn't my first language, and I was thinking cracks like in a wall, so your post didn't make sense. Drugs, unfortunately, no.

charlieg wrote:

or a review of a bad interview :)

It sort of was. I went to see if I could do that education. My biggest obstacle is my big mouth and arrogance. I can btw and think I will. Education never hurt anyone. Looked it up, and crack is cheap cocaine. You seriously don't want that in your blood. For anyone addicted, mail me today.

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Lost User

charlieg wrote:

Comment 1: python statement is spot on. You might not like python, or JS or whipped cream, but when in Rome...

You are absolutely right. I want to walk as a Roman.

charlieg wrote:

The waterfall method came from systems engineering - really big systems

Spot on.

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Sander Rossel

I guess, depending on your perspective :laugh:

Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

jschell

Eddy Vluggen wrote:

they teach theory and in the real world we do things differently. It should be more practical, less ideology,

Seems just like any school. Certainly in my electrical engineering lab class (you know actual hands on) the two actual practicing engineers that were my lab partners (taking it for the same reason as you - more money from the company) showed that early on when they instantly recognized that a electrical component was bad. As to my confusion when I was busily trying to find any info at all that lead them to that conclusion from the class literature they just pointed out that they 'knew' it. I believe they also pointed out that for a specific type of electrical circuit that absolutely no one would actually build it that way. Supposed to be a functioning amplifier but it was missing necessary components that would keep a practical device from running away with feedback noise. Certainly part of the reason that to this day I do not equate a 'formal education' as an equivalent to any amount of actual professional programming.

Lost User

jschell wrote:

Seems just like any school.

Most of the vacancies require accreditation; so, like any other manager, I need be young to be malleable and old enough to have experience. Oh, and a recent degree.

jschell wrote:

Certainly part of the reason that to this day I do not equate a 'formal education' as an equivalent to any amount of actual professional programming

I've seen those with a degree who get confused by code. Having a degree would not hurt me and it would be rather cheap. I know it's the wrong motivation, but there's a lot of toys there, and coffee with whipped cream. There's no downside to doing it. I will be pissing of the next potential employee about having whipped cream in my coffee, and how that's required to prevent bugs :laugh:

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.