Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Making simple calls complicated to make them simple again.

Making simple calls complicated to make them simple again.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpasp-netcomsecurityjson
18 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jschell

    Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

    Behind this, I have a really simple JSON structure:

    What happens when the json is missing the 'AuthorizationServerUrl' completely? Or it has been incorrectly entered and is not a valid url? What happens if the password is wrong or expired?

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Pete OHanlon
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    The options are validated to make sure the values are supplied. There's a lot of validation in here, and a lot more coming. This isn't just dump and throw. That's what is happening in the ValidateDataAnnotations part.

    Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Pete OHanlon

      I posted last week[^] about how I was developing a new component which is intended to help you interact with, and administer Keycloak instances. The first operation in Keycloak is the ability to generate an access token for a user; this capability lies at the heart of pretty much every operation. Now, if I were doing this via curl, this would be the command I would issue.

      curl \
      -d "client_id=admin-cli" \
      -d "username=admin" \
      -d "password=password" \
      -d "grant_type=password" \
      "http://localhost:8080/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token"

      All very straightforward, but I want to provide code access to the APIs. Right now, to do the same thing, I have a large number of classes, but the simplicity I was talking about last week allows me to write minimal APIs that look like this.

      using Keycloak.Core.Authentication;
      using Keycloak.Core.Models;
      using Keycloak.Core.Options;
      using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;

      var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
      builder.Services.AddEndpointsApiExplorer();
      builder.Services.AddHttpClient();
      builder.Services.AddOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>()
      .BindConfiguration("keycloak").
      ValidateDataAnnotations().
      ValidateOnStart();

      builder.Services.AddTransient<Authorize>();
      builder.Services.AddSingleton(r => r.GetRequiredService<IOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>>().Value);
      var app = builder.Build();

      app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World");

      app.MapGet("/token", async (Authorize authorize) =>
      {
      var options = builder.Configuration.GetSection("keycloak").Get<KeycloakConnectionOptions>();
      Token token = await authorize.GetAccessToken(options, "CP", "Master");
      return Results.Ok(token);
      });

      app.Run();

      Behind this, I have a really simple JSON structure:

      "keycloak": {
      "AuthorizationServerUrl": "http://localhost:8080/",
      "Realms": [{
      "Key": "CP",
      "Realm": "CP",
      "SslRequired": "External",
      "Resource": "CP-Test",
      "AuthenticationOptions": [{
      "Key": "Master",
      "AuthenticationType": "Password",
      "Password": {
      "Username": "peter",
      "Password": "peter"
      }
      }]
      }]
      }

      I love simplicity and I love that fast iterations allow me to turn the code around really quickly, including valida

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterkmx
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Very interesting :-), and I am curious about Keycloak.Core.... library. I guess this is work in progress (?)

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Pete OHanlon

        I posted last week[^] about how I was developing a new component which is intended to help you interact with, and administer Keycloak instances. The first operation in Keycloak is the ability to generate an access token for a user; this capability lies at the heart of pretty much every operation. Now, if I were doing this via curl, this would be the command I would issue.

        curl \
        -d "client_id=admin-cli" \
        -d "username=admin" \
        -d "password=password" \
        -d "grant_type=password" \
        "http://localhost:8080/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token"

        All very straightforward, but I want to provide code access to the APIs. Right now, to do the same thing, I have a large number of classes, but the simplicity I was talking about last week allows me to write minimal APIs that look like this.

        using Keycloak.Core.Authentication;
        using Keycloak.Core.Models;
        using Keycloak.Core.Options;
        using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;

        var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
        builder.Services.AddEndpointsApiExplorer();
        builder.Services.AddHttpClient();
        builder.Services.AddOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>()
        .BindConfiguration("keycloak").
        ValidateDataAnnotations().
        ValidateOnStart();

        builder.Services.AddTransient<Authorize>();
        builder.Services.AddSingleton(r => r.GetRequiredService<IOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>>().Value);
        var app = builder.Build();

        app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World");

        app.MapGet("/token", async (Authorize authorize) =>
        {
        var options = builder.Configuration.GetSection("keycloak").Get<KeycloakConnectionOptions>();
        Token token = await authorize.GetAccessToken(options, "CP", "Master");
        return Results.Ok(token);
        });

        app.Run();

        Behind this, I have a really simple JSON structure:

        "keycloak": {
        "AuthorizationServerUrl": "http://localhost:8080/",
        "Realms": [{
        "Key": "CP",
        "Realm": "CP",
        "SslRequired": "External",
        "Resource": "CP-Test",
        "AuthenticationOptions": [{
        "Key": "Master",
        "AuthenticationType": "Password",
        "Password": {
        "Username": "peter",
        "Password": "peter"
        }
        }]
        }]
        }

        I love simplicity and I love that fast iterations allow me to turn the code around really quickly, including valida

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jmaida
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Lost me in details. I see similarity of JSON and curl validations, but details flew right by. To be honest I don't what Keycloak is. I assume some sort of validation system.

        "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

        P P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • P Pete OHanlon

          I posted last week[^] about how I was developing a new component which is intended to help you interact with, and administer Keycloak instances. The first operation in Keycloak is the ability to generate an access token for a user; this capability lies at the heart of pretty much every operation. Now, if I were doing this via curl, this would be the command I would issue.

          curl \
          -d "client_id=admin-cli" \
          -d "username=admin" \
          -d "password=password" \
          -d "grant_type=password" \
          "http://localhost:8080/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token"

          All very straightforward, but I want to provide code access to the APIs. Right now, to do the same thing, I have a large number of classes, but the simplicity I was talking about last week allows me to write minimal APIs that look like this.

          using Keycloak.Core.Authentication;
          using Keycloak.Core.Models;
          using Keycloak.Core.Options;
          using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;

          var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
          builder.Services.AddEndpointsApiExplorer();
          builder.Services.AddHttpClient();
          builder.Services.AddOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>()
          .BindConfiguration("keycloak").
          ValidateDataAnnotations().
          ValidateOnStart();

          builder.Services.AddTransient<Authorize>();
          builder.Services.AddSingleton(r => r.GetRequiredService<IOptions<KeycloakConnectionOptions>>().Value);
          var app = builder.Build();

          app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World");

          app.MapGet("/token", async (Authorize authorize) =>
          {
          var options = builder.Configuration.GetSection("keycloak").Get<KeycloakConnectionOptions>();
          Token token = await authorize.GetAccessToken(options, "CP", "Master");
          return Results.Ok(token);
          });

          app.Run();

          Behind this, I have a really simple JSON structure:

          "keycloak": {
          "AuthorizationServerUrl": "http://localhost:8080/",
          "Realms": [{
          "Key": "CP",
          "Realm": "CP",
          "SslRequired": "External",
          "Resource": "CP-Test",
          "AuthenticationOptions": [{
          "Key": "Master",
          "AuthenticationType": "Password",
          "Password": {
          "Username": "peter",
          "Password": "peter"
          }
          }]
          }]
          }

          I love simplicity and I love that fast iterations allow me to turn the code around really quickly, including valida

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          var bs = builder.Services;

          bs.Add...
          etc.

          "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jmaida

            Lost me in details. I see similarity of JSON and curl validations, but details flew right by. To be honest I don't what Keycloak is. I assume some sort of validation system.

            "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

            P Offline
            P Offline
            peterkmx
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Yes, indeed ... it supports OAuth 2 scenarios for http endpoint protection ( [Keycloak](https://www.keycloak.org/) ), and it is an alternative for IS 4 ...

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P peterkmx

              Yes, indeed ... it supports OAuth 2 scenarios for http endpoint protection ( [Keycloak](https://www.keycloak.org/) ), and it is an alternative for IS 4 ...

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jmaida
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Thank you peterkm. I appreciate the info. Ask and you shall learn. BTW I do Worldle - Guess the Country![^] and today (Feb 15, 2023) is was Belgium. Extremely good beer for a Yankee like me.

              "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P peterkmx

                Very interesting :-), and I am curious about Keycloak.Core.... library. I guess this is work in progress (?)

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                While I am working on it, you can find the source in Github[^]. It's very rough while I add features to it.

                Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jmaida

                  Lost me in details. I see similarity of JSON and curl validations, but details flew right by. To be honest I don't what Keycloak is. I assume some sort of validation system.

                  "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Pete OHanlon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Keycloak is an identity and access management system. I find it to be easier to use than Identity Manager, and it has the benefit of being free. If you want user management that is easy to control, and that integrates with federated sources such as Facebook, Twitter, and Microsoft, this is the place to be.

                  Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jmaida

                    Thank you peterkm. I appreciate the info. Ask and you shall learn. BTW I do Worldle - Guess the Country![^] and today (Feb 15, 2023) is was Belgium. Extremely good beer for a Yankee like me.

                    "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    peterkmx
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Quote:

                    Extremely good beer for a Yankee like me.

                    Thanks for the recognition :-O ... all credits go to Belgian/Flemish monks :-) who created "Trappist Westmalle Dubbel", "Westvleteren", and some more ... Being careful is necessary as they are quite strong 8-9% or even more ...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Pete OHanlon

                      While I am working on it, you can find the source in Github[^]. It's very rough while I add features to it.

                      Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      peterkmx
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Great :-) thank you for the link, I am curious about testing OAuth 2.0 flows, I will plan/try something along this line, BR

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups