Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programmers obsolete - again.

Programmers obsolete - again.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csscomhelp
19 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jschell

    So just another reason for the doom sayers to abandon programming completely. Get out now! Certainly by the end of the year it will all be over. Then I can look forward to asking even more money since the pool of programmers is shrinking. ChatGPT becomes ChatRepair to automate bug fixing for less • The Register[^]

    R Offline
    R Offline
    RickZeeland
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    I thought that ChatGPT stood for: Chat Generating Panic and Terror :-\

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R RickZeeland

      I thought that ChatGPT stood for: Chat Generating Panic and Terror :-\

      G Offline
      G Offline
      Gary R Wheeler
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      No, no, no. Completely Heuristic Asshat Trap Growing Poltroons (&) Trollops

      Software Zen: delete this;

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C charlieg

        my attitude exactly. In a few years there will be articles like "Using ChatGPT results in project failure 90% of the time."

        Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nelek
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        In a few years? I would say more in a few months. EDIT: I should have read the other answers before... someone already said weeks :-D Here in Germany there is an article explaining how ChatGPT has wrongly "sentenced" a professor guilty of sexual harassment

        M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Peter_in_2780

          90%? You're an optimist.

          Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

          O Offline
          O Offline
          obermd
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          The other 10% will simply bury the failure in a corporate reorganization.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nelek

            In a few years? I would say more in a few months. EDIT: I should have read the other answers before... someone already said weeks :-D Here in Germany there is an article explaining how ChatGPT has wrongly "sentenced" a professor guilty of sexual harassment

            M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            charlieg
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            ha, truth. Clearly I'm not thinking properly. In the never ending hunt for free code (meaning management need not staff an engineering department) I suspect the thought is I can get most of this written and then let kiddies debug it. But there are two sides to the coin. If "AI" can write code, it can also generate bugs as fast. It should be entertaining.

            Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Peter_in_2780

              90%? You're an optimist.

              Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

              C Offline
              C Offline
              charlieg
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              I have been accused of such ... :)

              Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J jschell

                So just another reason for the doom sayers to abandon programming completely. Get out now! Certainly by the end of the year it will all be over. Then I can look forward to asking even more money since the pool of programmers is shrinking. ChatGPT becomes ChatRepair to automate bug fixing for less • The Register[^]

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mark Starr
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Ah, yes. But who will repair the repairman. Huh? WHO! :) :)

                Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jschell

                  So just another reason for the doom sayers to abandon programming completely. Get out now! Certainly by the end of the year it will all be over. Then I can look forward to asking even more money since the pool of programmers is shrinking. ChatGPT becomes ChatRepair to automate bug fixing for less • The Register[^]

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Member 13400076
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  We may have a few years yet, but exponential curves are hard to understand. I think we're in for a wild ride - https://vimeo.com/809258916/92b420d98a

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C charlieg

                    my attitude exactly. In a few years there will be articles like "Using ChatGPT results in project failure 90% of the time."

                    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jschell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    charlieg wrote:

                    will be articles like "Using ChatGPT results in project failure 90% of the time."

                    LOL - that is great!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C charlieg

                      ha, truth. Clearly I'm not thinking properly. In the never ending hunt for free code (meaning management need not staff an engineering department) I suspect the thought is I can get most of this written and then let kiddies debug it. But there are two sides to the coin. If "AI" can write code, it can also generate bugs as fast. It should be entertaining.

                      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DrWalter PE
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      That reminds me, years ago my boss asked why I wanted a faster PC. I said so I could make errors in microseconds, where it took me milliseconds before!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups