Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Can D simulated by H terminate normally?

Can D simulated by H terminate normally?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
debuggingdata-structuresperformancehelptutorial
42 Posts 4 Posters 19 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P polcott

    I generally get the same response that I am getting here. Everyone is so sure that I must be wrong that they don't bother to look at a single word that I have said and simply vote me down until the post is deleted. Any BSCS graduate taking five minutes to examine my code can see that D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly terminate normally because it remains stuck in recursive simulation. That by itself should be enough to pique their interest in looking at the additional details. Because my writing style is not even close the the writing style of a published PhD researcher what I say is almost always rejected out-of-hand without review of the substance of what I have said.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jeron1
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    polcott wrote:

    Because my writing style is not even close the the writing style of a published PhD researcher what I say is almost always rejected out-of-hand without review of the substance of what I have said.

    For some reason I doubt that. What would happen if everyone here agreed with your conclusion?

    "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jeron1

      polcott wrote:

      Because my writing style is not even close the the writing style of a published PhD researcher what I say is almost always rejected out-of-hand without review of the substance of what I have said.

      For some reason I doubt that. What would happen if everyone here agreed with your conclusion?

      "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

      P Offline
      P Offline
      polcott
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      If everyone here agreed that page three of this paper is correct and they sincerely meant this, then I would know that I have finally made my point clear enough and I would submit page three to letters to the editor of CACM. Simulating (partial) Halt Deciders Defeat the Halting Problem Proofs I might have to come up with a much less controversial title such as: Simple Termination analysis between executing C functions.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P polcott

        If everyone here agreed that page three of this paper is correct and they sincerely meant this, then I would know that I have finally made my point clear enough and I would submit page three to letters to the editor of CACM. Simulating (partial) Halt Deciders Defeat the Halting Problem Proofs I might have to come up with a much less controversial title such as: Simple Termination analysis between executing C functions.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jeron1
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        polcott wrote:

        If everyone here agreed that page three of this paper is correct

        Probably not going to happen here, so just cut to the chase. Change the title and submit, possibly adding that professors name somehow in the title.

        "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jeron1

          polcott wrote:

          If everyone here agreed that page three of this paper is correct

          Probably not going to happen here, so just cut to the chase. Change the title and submit, possibly adding that professors name somehow in the title.

          "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

          P Offline
          P Offline
          polcott
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          In other words you too are not going to bother to take five minutes and verify that D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly terminate normally because it remains stuck in recursive simulation.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P polcott

            In other words you too are not going to bother to take five minutes and verify that D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly terminate normally because it remains stuck in recursive simulation.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            jeron1
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            You are correct.

            "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J jeron1

              You are correct.

              "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

              P Offline
              P Offline
              polcott
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              The objective facts prove that I am correct thus superseding all opinions to the contrary. I really hope that you don't feel this same way about climate change.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P polcott

                The objective facts prove that I am correct thus superseding all opinions to the contrary. I really hope that you don't feel this same way about climate change.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jeron1
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                I claimed nothing about your conclusions one way or another.

                polcott wrote:

                The objective facts prove that I am correct thus superseding all opinions to the contrary.

                Where has that got you?

                "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jeron1

                  I claimed nothing about your conclusions one way or another.

                  polcott wrote:

                  The objective facts prove that I am correct thus superseding all opinions to the contrary.

                  Where has that got you?

                  "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  polcott
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  It has brought me to the harsh realization that humanity really is in the post truth era.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P polcott

                    It has brought me to the harsh realization that humanity really is in the post truth era.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jeron1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    You can't force people to care, that's the truth.

                    "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jeron1

                      You can't force people to care, that's the truth.

                      "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      polcott
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      The issue is not that people don't care. It is that they consider the entirely unsupported opinion of their reference group to carry infinitely more weight than the actual verified facts.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups