Just in case you thought AI was a fad, or something
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
If I just coulda learned AI from the beginning. i coulda been a contender - Google Search[^]
I don't think before I open my mouth, I like to be as surprised a everyone else. PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.1.0 JaxCoder.com Latest Article: Simon Says, A Child's Game
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
I imagine these are the people that are supposed to create their new "AI divisions". Technical officers. Now they need to produce "something". Analyzing (again) what people watch and buy and making (more) recommendations?
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
Would not be surprised to see a use case of 'eliminating jobs.'
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
It used to take years for someone to miss the point of a "Black Mirror" episode[^], and decide to make it reality[^]. Now it seems an episode explicitly mocking Netflix[^] is going to become reality[^] in just a few months. :doh:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
I already knew companies were paying 300k for AI talent. People that think this is going away are wrong. This is literally the second Internet. Get on board or get left behind - period.
Jeremy Falcon
-
I imagine these are the people that are supposed to create their new "AI divisions". Technical officers. Now they need to produce "something". Analyzing (again) what people watch and buy and making (more) recommendations?
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
The highest ones in the articles are all managers. Even up to the Director and Vice President. Actual non-management tech jobs there at the highest are 240k. And those are all single positions. So not a norm/average. In contrast the article also lists a AI position at "$28 per hour" as a consultant. That comes in at 56k a year. I wonder if someone got the ad wrong for that since I would expect more for a general Junior level developers.
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
When salaries in a specific field like this have a spike of this magnitude, I am quite confident that within a few years, Certainly a decade or less, The market will be flooded with buzzword babblers who create code which barely mimics (if it even comes close to aligning with) the actual goals of the company or the boss or any customer or any person who will ever use that code.
-
US firms like Netflix, Amazon offer AI jobs that pay up to $900K[^] 300K-900K per year including base salary and bonus, for AI devs. That is a lot of money....I mean, a lot of money for a developer. Edit: I did not read the entire article, but I would not be surprised if both companies are looking to use AI in or create with for new content.
What c-p said. A lot of us are old salts here. Some of us very old salts ;) We've seen the magic bullets come and go. I have to think hard about this - back in 1986 sort of, I saw a demo of hell, some sort of development platform for application development. It was like Visual Studio. It was impressive the level of productivity boost the tool suggested (I'm wiser now). I expressed this to the tech sales guy and he laughed at me. Then he apologized and explained. All of their experience was that if you bought a tool to roll out projects faster, the customers just wanted more. Since then, I have seen this to be a truism. I think once the panic of not having AI wears off, people will actually sit down and start to look at the real data. Why did our bug counts triple? Why can't we do incremental development (something ALL projects need to think about) any more? Why is the software team so damn stupid etc. So far, I see AI collecting data to do art, deep fakes and the like which will likely lead to legislation. We're already seeing the legal issues pop up. Sorry, you CAN'T use my intellectual property... Me? I have so much side work to do, my biggest problem is deciding if I want to do it. AI won't help me.
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
-
What c-p said. A lot of us are old salts here. Some of us very old salts ;) We've seen the magic bullets come and go. I have to think hard about this - back in 1986 sort of, I saw a demo of hell, some sort of development platform for application development. It was like Visual Studio. It was impressive the level of productivity boost the tool suggested (I'm wiser now). I expressed this to the tech sales guy and he laughed at me. Then he apologized and explained. All of their experience was that if you bought a tool to roll out projects faster, the customers just wanted more. Since then, I have seen this to be a truism. I think once the panic of not having AI wears off, people will actually sit down and start to look at the real data. Why did our bug counts triple? Why can't we do incremental development (something ALL projects need to think about) any more? Why is the software team so damn stupid etc. So far, I see AI collecting data to do art, deep fakes and the like which will likely lead to legislation. We're already seeing the legal issues pop up. Sorry, you CAN'T use my intellectual property... Me? I have so much side work to do, my biggest problem is deciding if I want to do it. AI won't help me.
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
charlieg wrote:
So far, I see AI collecting data to do art, deep fakes and the like which will likely lead to legislation. We're already seeing the legal issues pop up. Sorry, you CAN'T use my intellectual property...
Or AI Owners asking for legislation that prevent reverse engineering their product... so they get everything available in the net, but noone can touch theirs?
charlieg wrote:
Me? I have so much side work to do, my biggest problem is deciding if I want to do it. AI won't help me.
So do I, and I am starting to like when the side work is offline and no PC related. And I am not old salt... just middle aged active engineer.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
When salaries in a specific field like this have a spike of this magnitude, I am quite confident that within a few years, Certainly a decade or less, The market will be flooded with buzzword babblers who create code which barely mimics (if it even comes close to aligning with) the actual goals of the company or the boss or any customer or any person who will ever use that code.
