Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. AI is Stupid.

AI is Stupid.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
54 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    No appreciation for sarcasm, innuendo, puns, jokes, plays on words, history. The homogenizing of civilization. Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator is exhausting. You have to "explain" everything until it "gets" it (or not) in order to comply with (its) "Guidelines".

    "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jschell
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    The term "Artificial Intelligence" had a specific meaning starting in the 1950s. The term now however is used as a marketing term. The products and attempts (or dreams) of monetization is hoping to build on the claim that this is somehow moving towards that reality. I see no evidence of that. I consider the best demonstration of what real AI would look like is in the movie "I, Robot" with Will Smith. He is going to work and a robot is running down the street with a purse. Avoiding people and cars. Will Smith thinks it is nefarious but it turns out the woman that owns the robot forgot her purse (with medicine?) and the robot went to retrieve it. And as depicted in the moving that robot even then did not fit the model of being actually intelligent. So myself I will wait to get excited until I see real common place behavior like that.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jschell

      fgs1963 wrote:

      The potential of AI is undeniably profound.

      True. As was recognized at least in the 1950s. However "AI" as it is currently used is a marketing term. It has no real comparison to what was intended by the phrase "Artificial Intelligence" as it was used up to the point in the early 2000s.

      F Offline
      F Offline
      fgs1963
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      jschell wrote:

      However "AI" as it is currently used is a marketing term.

      True, at least 98.796% of the time (IMHO). But... there are some highly funded groups working on the real deal. Combine that with the "potential" of quantum computing and we may be on the cusp of a societal sea change.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        GIGO....

        R Offline
        R Offline
        raddevus
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Salvatore Terress wrote:

        GIGO....

        This same concept holds true for all human "intelligence" too. :rolleyes: The world may just get into more & worse trouble, since AI can speed up stupidity. :laugh:

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          GIGO....

          T Offline
          T Offline
          theoldfool
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Not here. GISO (garbage in salad out) :-D

          >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            What gave you to understand that it would be otherwise? Always remember, the key word is "artificial".

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Member 8002925
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything as do many today, and definitely doesn't get its feeling hurt (though it seemed to when I told it it was a fancy expert system with lots of memory and storage space) HAH

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T theoldfool

              Probably more appropriate to note that the AI application you were using was stupid, in your opinion. To consider that AI has great potential is easy, all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential. :) Like all things technology related, there is the good and the bad. Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous. Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Member 8002925
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Agreed!! Fro what it ism, firs tof all you have to be a good "question asker" as the AI doesn't have intuitive contextual abilities. that said, it (for the work....yes real work) I have done' with it, its pretty cool.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T theoldfool

                Probably more appropriate to note that the AI application you were using was stupid, in your opinion. To consider that AI has great potential is easy, all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential. :) Like all things technology related, there is the good and the bad. Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous. Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                theoldfool wrote:

                all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential.

                American? Maybe they wear that smile because they're told to. If you're above 40%, they're either a salesmen, or a politician. If you think 90%, then boy, you're gullible.

                theoldfool wrote:

                Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous.

                Which it also was before the internet. That's just temporary though, as everyone is on Facebook and Twitter.

                theoldfool wrote:

                Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.

                You just used a lot of words, and said nothing. Hello :)

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                T pkfoxP 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • R raddevus

                  Salvatore Terress wrote:

                  GIGO....

                  This same concept holds true for all human "intelligence" too. :rolleyes: The world may just get into more & worse trouble, since AI can speed up stupidity. :laugh:

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  raddevus wrote:

                  This same concept holds true for all human "intelligence" too. :rolleyes:

                  Which explains being "woke" :suss:

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jschell

                    The term "Artificial Intelligence" had a specific meaning starting in the 1950s. The term now however is used as a marketing term. The products and attempts (or dreams) of monetization is hoping to build on the claim that this is somehow moving towards that reality. I see no evidence of that. I consider the best demonstration of what real AI would look like is in the movie "I, Robot" with Will Smith. He is going to work and a robot is running down the street with a purse. Avoiding people and cars. Will Smith thinks it is nefarious but it turns out the woman that owns the robot forgot her purse (with medicine?) and the robot went to retrieve it. And as depicted in the moving that robot even then did not fit the model of being actually intelligent. So myself I will wait to get excited until I see real common place behavior like that.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    jschell wrote:

                    The term "Artificial Intelligence" had a specific meaning starting in the 1950s. The term now however is used as a marketing term.

                    Hence, upvoted. Intelligence isn't in the product; it does not think, deduce, rationalize, it replicated garbage from the internet. Good in making pictures, not good in conversations.

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      theoldfool wrote:

                      all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential.

                      American? Maybe they wear that smile because they're told to. If you're above 40%, they're either a salesmen, or a politician. If you think 90%, then boy, you're gullible.

                      theoldfool wrote:

                      Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous.

                      Which it also was before the internet. That's just temporary though, as everyone is on Facebook and Twitter.

                      theoldfool wrote:

                      Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.

                      You just used a lot of words, and said nothing. Hello :)

                      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      theoldfool
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Hello back to you. We rarely agree, but that is OK. (I have never been a member of facebook and such. )

                      >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T theoldfool

                        Hello back to you. We rarely agree, but that is OK. (I have never been a member of facebook and such. )

                        >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        theoldfool wrote:

                        We rarely agree, but that is OK.

                        I never asked you to.

                        theoldfool wrote:

                        I have never been a member of facebook and such.

                        Then you are as crazy as me, sir. Everyone nowadays does that? I salute you.

                        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Member 8002925

                          At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything as do many today, and definitely doesn't get its feeling hurt (though it seemed to when I told it it was a fancy expert system with lots of memory and storage space) HAH

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jeron1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          Member 8002925 wrote:

                          At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything...

                          If it 'learns' from humans, it will.

                          "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jeron1

                            Member 8002925 wrote:

                            At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything...

                            If it 'learns' from humans, it will.

                            "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            trønderen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            jeron1 wrote:

                            Member 8002925 wrote: At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything...If it 'learns' from humans, it will.

                            James P Hogan: The Two Faces of Tomorrow[^] is a good read. Don't worry about the publication year. The AI parts could have been authored last year. Most younger people will be surprised how little things have changed in the AI sector in 40+ years.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              No appreciation for sarcasm, innuendo, puns, jokes, plays on words, history. The homogenizing of civilization. Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator is exhausting. You have to "explain" everything until it "gets" it (or not) in order to comply with (its) "Guidelines".

                              "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Steve Raw
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              I've thought about the same thing. If I want to have AI write a subroutine, I have to instruct AI's every step. I could say "Make a web page", but what would be the default output? This is why I think writing code for specific purposes is no different than writing it on your own. Sure, AI can make something generic, but if you want software developed, you still have to designate each instruction on your own.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                No appreciation for sarcasm, innuendo, puns, jokes, plays on words, history. The homogenizing of civilization. Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator is exhausting. You have to "explain" everything until it "gets" it (or not) in order to comply with (its) "Guidelines".

                                "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                CPallini
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                Gerry Schmitz wrote:

                                Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator

                                Do you think you can tell?

                                "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  theoldfool wrote:

                                  all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential.

                                  American? Maybe they wear that smile because they're told to. If you're above 40%, they're either a salesmen, or a politician. If you think 90%, then boy, you're gullible.

                                  theoldfool wrote:

                                  Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous.

                                  Which it also was before the internet. That's just temporary though, as everyone is on Facebook and Twitter.

                                  theoldfool wrote:

                                  Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.

                                  You just used a lot of words, and said nothing. Hello :)

                                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                                  pkfoxP Offline
                                  pkfoxP Offline
                                  pkfox
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #35

                                  I am not on Facebook or twitter

                                  In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    fgs1963 wrote:

                                    The potential of AI is undeniably profound.

                                    Well that does not really mean anything. Yes AI has potential, but it is far too early to say whether that will be good or bad for the world.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mark Starr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    Bad. The systems will continue to spew untruths and humans will continue to be too lazy to fact-check the misinformation. Such is my prognostication. ;P

                                    Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F fgs1963

                                      jschell wrote:

                                      However "AI" as it is currently used is a marketing term.

                                      True, at least 98.796% of the time (IMHO). But... there are some highly funded groups working on the real deal. Combine that with the "potential" of quantum computing and we may be on the cusp of a societal sea change.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jschell
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      fgs1963 wrote:

                                      there are some highly funded groups working on the real deal

                                      All of that has been true since the 1960s though.

                                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        No appreciation for sarcasm, innuendo, puns, jokes, plays on words, history. The homogenizing of civilization. Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator is exhausting. You have to "explain" everything until it "gets" it (or not) in order to comply with (its) "Guidelines".

                                        "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

                                        H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        Harrison Pratt
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #38

                                        Ahhh ... but do you have to keep explaining the same thing again and again?

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mark Starr

                                          Bad. The systems will continue to spew untruths and humans will continue to be too lazy to fact-check the misinformation. Such is my prognostication. ;P

                                          Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jschell
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          Mark Starr wrote:

                                          The systems will continue to spew untruths and humans will continue to be too lazy to fact-check the misinformation.

                                          Errr...except the following is true right now 'Humans will continue to spew untruths and other humans will continue to be too lazy to fact-check the misinformation.' So not really that much change.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups