Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Kinda wish I knew more about "AI"

Kinda wish I knew more about "AI"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
designai-codingcomgraphicsai-models
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitch
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    But I can't be arsed to learn it. I do have an idea though - using an LLM to do code synthesis. Code synthesis is similar to code generation, but unlike code generation code created via code synthesis looks as though it was written by a human being. This is particularly important for things like parser generators, where generated code tends to be rigid. For example - a generated LL(1) parser always matches greedy while a hand rolled recursive descent parser will switch between greedy and lazy consumption as the situation calls for it. The end result is more compact and more efficient. I don't recommend using parser generators because of the code they produce - unless you like source files in the hundreds of thousands of kilobytes or even megabytes. Code synthesis stands a good chance of changing that. Things like Github Copilot can produce code. Code synthesis seems like this functionality.

    Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

      But I can't be arsed to learn it. I do have an idea though - using an LLM to do code synthesis. Code synthesis is similar to code generation, but unlike code generation code created via code synthesis looks as though it was written by a human being. This is particularly important for things like parser generators, where generated code tends to be rigid. For example - a generated LL(1) parser always matches greedy while a hand rolled recursive descent parser will switch between greedy and lazy consumption as the situation calls for it. The end result is more compact and more efficient. I don't recommend using parser generators because of the code they produce - unless you like source files in the hundreds of thousands of kilobytes or even megabytes. Code synthesis stands a good chance of changing that. Things like Github Copilot can produce code. Code synthesis seems like this functionality.

      Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

      W Offline
      W Offline
      wapiti64
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I am curious as well, but even more curious about AI 'improvements' for hardware. Exactly what are those improvements and how can they be used? Can I use the arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and memory unit to increase performance for non-AI algorithms? Similar to you, I am just too busy with regular work to delve into it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups