Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Million qubits chip a possibility, could enable practical quantum computers

Million qubits chip a possibility, could enable practical quantum computers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestionannouncement
11 Posts 5 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    BernardIE5317
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Anisotropic exchange interaction of two hole-spin qubits[^]

    J J B 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • B BernardIE5317

      Anisotropic exchange interaction of two hole-spin qubits[^]

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jeremy Falcon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      This is cool and not cool at the same time. :-\

      Jeremy Falcon

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jeremy Falcon

        This is cool and not cool at the same time. :-\

        Jeremy Falcon

        D Offline
        D Offline
        dandy72
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I see what you did there. But then, doing so killed the cat. (am I doing this right?)

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D dandy72

          I see what you did there. But then, doing so killed the cat. (am I doing this right?)

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jeremy Falcon
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          dandy72 wrote:

          (am I doing this right?)

          Yes and no? :laugh:

          Jeremy Falcon

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jeremy Falcon

            dandy72 wrote:

            (am I doing this right?)

            Yes and no? :laugh:

            Jeremy Falcon

            D Offline
            D Offline
            dandy72
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Touché.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B BernardIE5317

              Anisotropic exchange interaction of two hole-spin qubits[^]

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jschell
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              " that are already possible (and often more efficiently) on traditional computers." What that really means is that it is not even close to being economical to do anything with this. And I don't see anything it the article that really suggests that is going to be changed by this.

              B 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • J jschell

                " that are already possible (and often more efficiently) on traditional computers." What that really means is that it is not even close to being economical to do anything with this. And I don't see anything it the article that really suggests that is going to be changed by this.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                BernardIE5317
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I could not locate the quote you referenced. May I please request guidance. Thank You Kindly

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BernardIE5317

                  Anisotropic exchange interaction of two hole-spin qubits[^]

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bruce Patin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I once measured hole flow in a physics lab. It was hard to accept dealing with nothing, but spin? That's like the stuff that hits the rotary oscillator.:confused:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B BernardIE5317

                    I could not locate the quote you referenced. May I please request guidance. Thank You Kindly

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jschell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Did you push the "Continue reading" button at the bottom of the article?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jschell

                      " that are already possible (and often more efficiently) on traditional computers." What that really means is that it is not even close to being economical to do anything with this. And I don't see anything it the article that really suggests that is going to be changed by this.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      BernardIE5317
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The quote to which you refer is re/ current QM technology and not of the new QM technology presented in article. As for your stated pessimism there is the paragraph title id est "Million qubit chips now possible".

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B BernardIE5317

                        The quote to which you refer is re/ current QM technology and not of the new QM technology presented in article. As for your stated pessimism there is the paragraph title id est "Million qubit chips now possible".

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jschell
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        BernardIE5317 wrote:

                        The quote to which you refer is re/ current QM technology and not of the new QM technology presented in article.

                        Yes I knew that when I posted it. I was specifically referring to the current state of the technology.

                        BernardIE5317 wrote:

                        As for your stated pessimism there is the paragraph title id est "Million qubit chips now possible"

                        Powering a rocket with anti-matter is also possible. But there is no evidence it will ever be economical. And with this article the fact that they produced one does not lend itself to demonstrating that in terms of engineering that it will be possible to produce an actual chip with the reported number. No matter the cost.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups