Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Not a fan

Not a fan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
10 Posts 6 Posters 267 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOP
    wrote last edited by realJSOP
    #1

    ...of the new layout.

    There. Someone had to say it.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      User 7608137
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Me neither, at least for the moment - I guess every change needs some time to adapt to.
      But I am so glad it is back !
      I think the tight view will be one of the things to bring back quickly : having good overview is precious !

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • realJSOPR realJSOP

        ...of the new layout.

        There. Someone had to say it.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        dlymand2
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

        realJSOPR R 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D dlymand2

          @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

          realJSOPR Offline
          realJSOPR Offline
          realJSOP
          wrote last edited by realJSOP
          #4

          @dlymand2 said in Not a fan:

          @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

          I get it, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. :)

          I tried to see what dev stack y'all were using, and it looks like you're using React but not(?) typescript. How close am I?

          I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

          For the record, I really don't like React and javascript...

          BTW, it would be real nice if we had a React forum in the web development section.

          Graeme_GrantG D 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • realJSOPR realJSOP

            @dlymand2 said in Not a fan:

            @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

            I get it, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. :)

            I tried to see what dev stack y'all were using, and it looks like you're using React but not(?) typescript. How close am I?

            I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

            For the record, I really don't like React and javascript...

            BTW, it would be real nice if we had a React forum in the web development section.

            Graeme_GrantG Offline
            Graeme_GrantG Offline
            Graeme_Grant
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @realJSOP said in Not a fan:

            I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

            I'm like you with React. Have you looked at Zustand. I only use useState if I have to.

            realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Graeme_GrantG Graeme_Grant

              @realJSOP said in Not a fan:

              I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

              I'm like you with React. Have you looked at Zustand. I only use useState if I have to.

              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOP
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Graeme_Grant said in Not a fan:

              @realJSOP said in Not a fan:

              I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

              I'm like you with React. Have you looked at Zustand. I only use useState if I have to.

              I'm aware of it but haven't looked at it yet.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • realJSOPR realJSOP

                @dlymand2 said in Not a fan:

                @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

                I get it, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. :)

                I tried to see what dev stack y'all were using, and it looks like you're using React but not(?) typescript. How close am I?

                I'm currently working on a React (v19) project, and my desktop programmer brain is fighting it. We make extensive use of tables (material-table/core) and custom inputs and I'm currently working at home on a version that makes substantially less use of useStates because they clobber rendering performance. I've managed to duplicate about 90% of our infrastructure and reduced the # of useStates from over 550 to just 47 instances.

                For the record, I really don't like React and javascript...

                BTW, it would be real nice if we had a React forum in the web development section.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                dlymand2
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @realJSOP The React section has been added under web development. I’ll get you more details on the dev stack tomorrow.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • D dlymand2

                  @realJSOP We hear you, and believe me we wish we could have kept the old site going if that was an option. Migrating 5 million+ posts and millions of users narrowed the choices. There are a bunch of settings that you can change if you'd like to customize your own view.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rage
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @dlymand2 What kept you from keeping the old site ?
                  Is my view of how web sites work a bit too naive, or wasn't it just that you get credentials to log on the server and voilà ? Why was a migration necessary ?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Mike HankeyM Offline
                    Mike HankeyM Offline
                    Mike Hankey
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    I'm not a big fan of the new layout either but the times they are a changin and with new persons in charge they have to give it their look, a new look.
                    We'll get used to it in time.
                    What I miss is the people that made up the old Project and hope that most will migrate to the new site.

                    The CodeProject.com site, seems like you get errors clicking on any article to view. It's a dead puppy!

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

                      I'm not a big fan of the new layout either but the times they are a changin and with new persons in charge they have to give it their look, a new look.
                      We'll get used to it in time.
                      What I miss is the people that made up the old Project and hope that most will migrate to the new site.

                      The CodeProject.com site, seems like you get errors clicking on any article to view. It's a dead puppy!

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      dlymand2
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @Mike-Hankey We are launching a new site today Mike, we will update you shortly.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups