No Confidence
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
While this is a part of the solution approach, our border is so large that effective control is probably not in the cards. The war on drugs has been trying for years to control this and has had only limited success. Controlling people is probably harder. Ed
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
John How would the US cover every inch of their border and coast? What of the threat of potential terrorists already being planted in the US? Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
I'm not sure if you guys had been following what's been going on in Australia a couple of weeks ago, but we had a HUGE debate about immigration and border control. Lots of Afghanistan refugees were trying to come into the country illegally and the PM put his foot down and said 'No more'. Huge court case as to whether he was acting illegally in not letting them land. Public opinion was divided as to whether we should treat refugees more leniently and humanely or whether we should really start getting tough. In any case the debate seems to be over now. cheers, Chris Maunder (CodeProject)
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
... : don't do things that make people want to kill you. I know it's an unpopular way to think about it - but it's really the only one that makes sense. You can't hunt them down and kill them or take over their countries or kill their leaders - you'll just breed a new generation of terrorists. It's that simple. And really, it seems that all they want is for the US to stay the hell out of their lives. We've been fucking around in their business for decades, just to keep oil prices low, and now they've had enough. So, if I was running the show, I'd quit worrying about who to kill and how, and I'd focus on getting the hell out of those countries for good - in all ways : military, economic, humanitarian, religious, political, etc.. Let them all kill each other, oppress each other, fight over sand, whatever they want to do. To hell with em. We'll take our ball and go home. If they want to sell us oil on their own terms, great. If not, we can buy from South America. I'm not saying give in to every two-bit terrorist's demands. But this is bigger than someone bitching about political prisoners - we've been pissing in their sandbox for a long time and they have every right to be mad (not to kill thousands of us, but to be mad, yes). -c (american, but reasonable) ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
... : don't do things that make people want to kill you. I know it's an unpopular way to think about it - but it's really the only one that makes sense. You can't hunt them down and kill them or take over their countries or kill their leaders - you'll just breed a new generation of terrorists. It's that simple. And really, it seems that all they want is for the US to stay the hell out of their lives. We've been fucking around in their business for decades, just to keep oil prices low, and now they've had enough. So, if I was running the show, I'd quit worrying about who to kill and how, and I'd focus on getting the hell out of those countries for good - in all ways : military, economic, humanitarian, religious, political, etc.. Let them all kill each other, oppress each other, fight over sand, whatever they want to do. To hell with em. We'll take our ball and go home. If they want to sell us oil on their own terms, great. If not, we can buy from South America. I'm not saying give in to every two-bit terrorist's demands. But this is bigger than someone bitching about political prisoners - we've been pissing in their sandbox for a long time and they have every right to be mad (not to kill thousands of us, but to be mad, yes). -c (american, but reasonable) ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
Agree -- If only it were that easy. I feel that, unfortunately, as long as such fundamental differences exist between our cultures and our religion that there will never be peace. There are those who will not rest until America and the American way of life, as well as Christianity and Judaism, are destroyed. And we have to protect our interests here and abroad. As well as those who request our assistance for we are the only significant power to protect many of the nations in our world. It is our duty as Americans and as human beings. I just hope that we have the stomach for the battles that are before us. WillCodeForMoney
-
... : don't do things that make people want to kill you. I know it's an unpopular way to think about it - but it's really the only one that makes sense. You can't hunt them down and kill them or take over their countries or kill their leaders - you'll just breed a new generation of terrorists. It's that simple. And really, it seems that all they want is for the US to stay the hell out of their lives. We've been fucking around in their business for decades, just to keep oil prices low, and now they've had enough. So, if I was running the show, I'd quit worrying about who to kill and how, and I'd focus on getting the hell out of those countries for good - in all ways : military, economic, humanitarian, religious, political, etc.. Let them all kill each other, oppress each other, fight over sand, whatever they want to do. To hell with em. We'll take our ball and go home. If they want to sell us oil on their own terms, great. If not, we can buy from South America. I'm not saying give in to every two-bit terrorist's demands. But this is bigger than someone bitching about political prisoners - we've been pissing in their sandbox for a long time and they have every right to be mad (not to kill thousands of us, but to be mad, yes). -c (american, but reasonable) ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
Actually, Chris, I agree with you for the most part. We will have to conquer the entire Middle East and hold it to stop this kind of crap. (I don't agree that getting out of their lives will make a difference. We are hated for the goodness in us, not the badness.) If we don't have the will to do that than we should do nothing at all. Anything short of that will be a waste of innocents lives. "I never met anyone I didn't like" Will Rogers.
-
Agree -- If only it were that easy. I feel that, unfortunately, as long as such fundamental differences exist between our cultures and our religion that there will never be peace. There are those who will not rest until America and the American way of life, as well as Christianity and Judaism, are destroyed. And we have to protect our interests here and abroad. As well as those who request our assistance for we are the only significant power to protect many of the nations in our world. It is our duty as Americans and as human beings. I just hope that we have the stomach for the battles that are before us. WillCodeForMoney
There are those who will not rest until America and the American way of life, as well as Christianity and Judaism, are destroyed. note that there are many non-islamic countries in the world that are not being attacked by terrorists. I just hope that we have the stomach for the battles that are before us. given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
There are those who will not rest until America and the American way of life, as well as Christianity and Judaism, are destroyed. note that there are many non-islamic countries in the world that are not being attacked by terrorists. I just hope that we have the stomach for the battles that are before us. given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
note that there are many non-islamic countries in the world that are not being attacked by terrorists. Don't fool yourself, these people are even after Saudi Arabia and Egypt (they want Islamic based religious governments). given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
-
note that there are many non-islamic countries in the world that are not being attacked by terrorists. Don't fool yourself, these people are even after Saudi Arabia and Egypt (they want Islamic based religious governments). given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. my statement makes perfect sense. if bush chooses the violent route, given non-violent aternatives, i am (as is every other US citizen) entitled to protest. i say this only because it seems that he's already decided on invading afghanistan (at least according to all of the news reports i've heard). and to me that seems to place our troops and our civilians in unnecessary danger. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. my statement makes perfect sense. if bush chooses the violent route, given non-violent aternatives, i am (as is every other US citizen) entitled to protest. i say this only because it seems that he's already decided on invading afghanistan (at least according to all of the news reports i've heard). and to me that seems to place our troops and our civilians in unnecessary danger. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
For what its worth, I think an invasion of Afghanistan is sheer idiocy. And I'm otherwise a Bush supporter. "I never met anyone I didn't like" Will Rogers.
-
given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. my statement makes perfect sense. if bush chooses the violent route, given non-violent aternatives, i am (as is every other US citizen) entitled to protest. i say this only because it seems that he's already decided on invading afghanistan (at least according to all of the news reports i've heard). and to me that seems to place our troops and our civilians in unnecessary danger. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
What doesn't make sense is the idea that action guarantees death and non-action prevents it. More Americans are going to die, no matter what course of action is taken. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
What doesn't make sense is the idea that action guarantees death and non-action prevents it. do you seriously believe rounding up and sentencing a handful of people to some kind of Western justice is going to teach those all of those nasty Islamic heathens a lesson they'll never forget? "Oh no! The Great Satan is displeased! Run for your lives!" if so, i've got some nice land out on Israel's west bank that i'd like to sell ya. More Americans are going to die, no matter what course of action is taken. says who? -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
What doesn't make sense is the idea that action guarantees death and non-action prevents it. do you seriously believe rounding up and sentencing a handful of people to some kind of Western justice is going to teach those all of those nasty Islamic heathens a lesson they'll never forget? "Oh no! The Great Satan is displeased! Run for your lives!" if so, i've got some nice land out on Israel's west bank that i'd like to sell ya. More Americans are going to die, no matter what course of action is taken. says who? -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
do you seriously believe rounding up and sentencing a handful of people to some kind of Western justice is going to teach those all of those nasty Islamic heathens a lesson they'll never forget? "Oh no! The Great Satan is displeased! Run for your lives!" if so, i've got some nice land out on Israel's west bank that i'd like to sell ya. Hmm, I don't remember ever saying that. say who? LOL, Bin Laden Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
-
given non-life-threatening alternatives, i hope g_wBush has the stomach for having his own people protest his actions, if what he does ends up killing more US civilians. That just doesn't make sense. I guess we should get rid of all police because sometimes people not directly involved in the crime get hurt. my statement makes perfect sense. if bush chooses the violent route, given non-violent aternatives, i am (as is every other US citizen) entitled to protest. i say this only because it seems that he's already decided on invading afghanistan (at least according to all of the news reports i've heard). and to me that seems to place our troops and our civilians in unnecessary danger. -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
"i say this only because it seems that he's already decided on invading afghanistan (at least according to all of the news reports i've heard). and to me that seems to place our troops and our civilians in unnecessary danger. " As an ex military person I would ask the question "Whay have the troops if you are not going to use them?" The civilian population is already at risk and the more we capitulate and cater to the terrorists the greater risk we put them in. I agree: Lets dialog with the terrorists but first lets get their undivided attention. I think LBJ had the correct idea: "Get them by the balls and their hearts and minds will follow"
-
While this is a part of the solution approach, our border is so large that effective control is probably not in the cards. The war on drugs has been trying for years to control this and has had only limited success. Controlling people is probably harder. Ed
-
Soviet Union used to have an even larger border before it split up, I believe, but was able to have it protected.
Their approach to civil liberties are somewhat different than in the US. They may also have a much different pattern of consumers entering/leaving the country from other souces. At both teh Canadian and Mexican borders we have thousands every day that cross. I'm not sure they have that option there. Ed
-
The key to suppressing terrorist acts is maintaining tight control over border crossings. IMHO, the U.S. Border Patrol (my sister is an agent for them) is not properly funded, manned, or supplied for this kind of suppression. They simply don't have enough people and can't afford the anti-incursion technologies that can even warn them when someone crosses over illegally into this country. This means that someone could come in along an unused portion of beach, through the mountains, or any other number of routes. They can carry nuclear or biological weapons in something as small as a backpack and sneak right in and continue killing Americans. Is it up to us citizens to make sure that they don't get across the border? Looks like it is to me...
Which borders would you have closed to stop Columbine or Oklahoma City?