Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Ok language gurus

Ok language gurus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
26 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jorgen Sigvardsson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

    J S L G D 8 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

      Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jason Hooper
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: then why do I see things like captain's and captains Where you see captains written in a possessive context, it is wrong. It should be written captain's. Captains is simply the plural of captain. Its is an exception to the rule; in this case, it is the possessive form of it. It's means It is—no exceptions. - Jason (SonorkID 100.611) The Code Project - Orange makes the art grow fonder

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jason Hooper

        Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: then why do I see things like captain's and captains Where you see captains written in a possessive context, it is wrong. It should be written captain's. Captains is simply the plural of captain. Its is an exception to the rule; in this case, it is the possessive form of it. It's means It is—no exceptions. - Jason (SonorkID 100.611) The Code Project - Orange makes the art grow fonder

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Sigvardsson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks! :) -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

          Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Senkwe Chanda
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Simply put, English sucks. Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

          L T G S L 8 Replies Last reply
          0
          • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

            Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            OK Captain Duron that's about enough out of you. Why do you want to use Captains or Captain's when there is only one Captain Duron? Also with only 57 days left till I'm 35 and only ever having spoken English, I have no idea what pronouns and such are. I got proper nouns and verbs while at school but the rest leave me clueless. So while we're speaking foreign languages, how do I ask a Swedish chick if she'd like to try out the latest porn star position with me? Is the stereotype of Sweden and it being the porn capital of the world true? Or should I find another country for that particular holiday? Michael Martin Australia "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Senkwe Chanda

              Simply put, English sucks. Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              :laugh::laugh::laugh:

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Senkwe Chanda

                Simply put, English sucks. Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Ted Ferenc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I have posted this link before, but have a read:- http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/quest/200212/stories/2002121400800200.htm[^] English is fun:sigh:


                Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas A. Edison

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  OK Captain Duron that's about enough out of you. Why do you want to use Captains or Captain's when there is only one Captain Duron? Also with only 57 days left till I'm 35 and only ever having spoken English, I have no idea what pronouns and such are. I got proper nouns and verbs while at school but the rest leave me clueless. So while we're speaking foreign languages, how do I ask a Swedish chick if she'd like to try out the latest porn star position with me? Is the stereotype of Sweden and it being the porn capital of the world true? Or should I find another country for that particular holiday? Michael Martin Australia "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  :laugh::laugh::laugh: Michael Martin wrote: So while we're speaking foreign languages, how do I ask a Swedish chick if she'd like to try out the latest porn star position with me? "Vill du pröva den senaste porrstjärneställningen med mig?" (Pronounciation is left as an exercise for the reader ;P) Michael Martin wrote: Is the stereotype of Sweden and it being the porn capital of the world true? Or should I find another country for that particular holiday? I don't really know. I know porn flicks are produced here, but I doubt we're the "porn capital". I would imagine the US is. Or maybe Australia? What do I know? ;) -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                    :laugh::laugh::laugh: Michael Martin wrote: So while we're speaking foreign languages, how do I ask a Swedish chick if she'd like to try out the latest porn star position with me? "Vill du pröva den senaste porrstjärneställningen med mig?" (Pronounciation is left as an exercise for the reader ;P) Michael Martin wrote: Is the stereotype of Sweden and it being the porn capital of the world true? Or should I find another country for that particular holiday? I don't really know. I know porn flicks are produced here, but I doubt we're the "porn capital". I would imagine the US is. Or maybe Australia? What do I know? ;) -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: What do I know? Judging by those really big words further up the post, a fucking great deal more than me. :-D Michael Martin Australia "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                      Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      Gary R Wheeler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      "It is the captain's ship." possessive; the ship belongs to the captain. "The captains are ready." plural; more than one captain is ready. "It is the captains' berth." plural possessive; the berth is for one or more captains. Note that in the plural possesive, the apostrophe follows the s, rather than in the singular case, where it precedes it.


                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Senkwe Chanda

                        Simply put, English sucks. Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gary R Wheeler
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Even if English does 'suck' as you say, you don't seem to have much trouble expressing your feelings in it, hmm?


                        Software Zen: delete this;

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gary R Wheeler

                          "It is the captain's ship." possessive; the ship belongs to the captain. "The captains are ready." plural; more than one captain is ready. "It is the captains' berth." plural possessive; the berth is for one or more captains. Note that in the plural possesive, the apostrophe follows the s, rather than in the singular case, where it precedes it.


                          Software Zen: delete this;

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jorgen Sigvardsson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          What came first? Contractions or possesive pronouns? Clearly, there's a bug in the English language. Someone should fix this mess. :-D -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                          T R 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                            What came first? Contractions or possesive pronouns? Clearly, there's a bug in the English language. Someone should fix this mess. :-D -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Ted Ferenc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            English is a mis mash of several languages, were words from different languages have come into use, from Latin, Anglo Saxon, French and German, plus many others. e.g. Pig and Pork once were the description of a Pig Pig, I belive was from the Anglo Saxon Pigge whereas Pork came from the old French Porc. Over time the usage words changed, to what we have now, there are many similar examples.


                            Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas A. Edison

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Gary R Wheeler

                              Even if English does 'suck' as you say, you don't seem to have much trouble expressing your feelings in it, hmm?


                              Software Zen: delete this;

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nnamdi Onyeyiri
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              :suss:


                              To those who didn't make it, we will remember you. To those who did :bob: is back. - Megan Forbes in Black Friday
                              Another Post by NnamdiOnyeyiri

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                dacris
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                It seems that in Old English, all possessives had an ending of 'es'. So the correct form would actually be captaines. I have a symbiotic relationship with my computer.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T Ted Ferenc

                                  English is a mis mash of several languages, were words from different languages have come into use, from Latin, Anglo Saxon, French and German, plus many others. e.g. Pig and Pork once were the description of a Pig Pig, I belive was from the Anglo Saxon Pigge whereas Pork came from the old French Porc. Over time the usage words changed, to what we have now, there are many similar examples.


                                  Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas A. Edison

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  dacris
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  It's interesting to see how animal names have remained Anglo-Saxon while their meats are from French. Let's see: pig -> pork (Fr. porc) cow -> beef (Fr. boeuf) And there are many others but I don't recall them. I have a symbiotic relationship with my computer.

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Senkwe Chanda

                                    Simply put, English sucks. Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Senkwe Chanda
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    I got voted down to a 1?? Christ, you leave out one teeny weeny smiley emoticon and the masses turn on you. :doh: It was a joke, people, a joke!! I love English!! I love anything to do with English. I even love *gasp* the English!! Woke up this morning...and got myself a blog

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D dacris

                                      It's interesting to see how animal names have remained Anglo-Saxon while their meats are from French. Let's see: pig -> pork (Fr. porc) cow -> beef (Fr. boeuf) And there are many others but I don't recall them. I have a symbiotic relationship with my computer.

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Ted Ferenc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I've learn't something new, I hadn't spotted that!


                                      Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas A. Edison

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                        Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Navin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        As stated, "its" is the exception, it is always posessive, and "it's" is always the contraction of "it is". As for posessive, here are some examples of correct and incorrect usage, as noted by the smiles. :-D Code Project is a developer's best friend. X| Code Projet contains developers articles and ideas. :-D A lot of developers use Code Project. X| Code Project is a great site for developer's. A side note about the last example - many many years back I had an interview for Digital (Yep, before they were even Compaq) and there was gift shop that had a list of items for sale. They all were spelled incorrectly - they were plurals but had apostrophes. But somebody else had evidently come along and noticed the error, since there were X's through all the apostrophes. :-D If your nose runs and your feet smell, then you're built upside down.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                          Here's something I've been pondering for the last few minutes: If it's means it is and its is a possesive pronoun1, then why do I see things like captain's and captains in text where both variants are used as possesive pronouns? I.e., captain's in those contexts does not mean captain is. What's going on here? Does 50% have it all wrong (the distribution of ' is approximately 50/50) or is this an ambiguity in the English language? :confused: 1 I think that's what it's called in English. :~ -- You still have your old friend Zoidberg. You all have Zoidberg!

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Roger Wright
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: Does 50% have it all wrong Yes. Captain's is the possessive form for a single captain. Captains is the plural of captain. And captains' is the possessive form for multiple captains. Its is an oddity - the word should be it's for the possessive, but it's was already taken for the contraction of it is. "When a surly lout knocked our captain's hat to the floor, a meeting of all the captains was called to judge the case. The meeting, however, was unbearably stuffy as, being held shortly after a sumptuous supper, the room was quickly filled with the pungent odors of the captains' flatulence." "Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything,
                                          but you still can't help but smile when you see one
                                          tumble down the stairs."

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups