Al-Queda with nukes?
-
Its not as if what they do is anything to do with Islam - look at the number of muslims they kill along with everyone else :suss: They don't even have the guts to stop hiding behind that :mad: The tigress is here :-D
As a muslim .. I'm so sorry about the idea that non-muslims take about islam..Which is caused by some Terror actions... Trollslayer wrote: Its not as if what they do is anything to do with Islam - look at the number of muslims they kill along with everyone else Yes..We must distinguish: Islam <> Some bad actions done by some muslims.(like Qieda) judism <> what Israeli soldiers do in Palestine. Christianity <> innocent ppl that the american army kills Islam <> terrorism judaism <>Zionism Christianity <> injustice. I wish you've got the idea though my bad English.
-
Al Qaida commander 'anticipates' 100,000 Americans dead in attack ... In regard to rumors about a large-scale attack against the U.S. during the month of Ramadan, Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. He added that he "anticipates, but will not swear, that the attack will happen during Ramadan." He further stated that the attack will be carried out in a way that will "amaze the world and turn Al Qaida into [an organization that] horrifies the world until the law of Allah is implemented, actually implemented, and not just in words, on His land... You wait and see that the balance of power between Al Qaida and its rivals will change, all of a sudden, Allah willing." http://216.26.163.62/2003/me_terror_11_13.html[^] Sounds like they're talking about a nuke. Though, hollow threats are also part of their methods. It would certainly alter things if Al-Queda proved that they had nuclear capability. (BTW, I didn't post this as a sneaky counterargument to the "Bush/Clinton is scaring us into despotism" post immediately preceeding this one.) ------------------------------------------ The ousted but stubbornly non-dead leader reportedly released an audiotape this weekend, ending by calling on Iraqis to, quote, "resist the occupation in any way you can, from writing on walls, to boycotting, to demonstrating and taking up arms." adding, "you know, pretty much anything I used to kill you for." - The Daily Show
This same guy says that 40 Americans were killed in the latest Saudi Arabia bombing. He's having a hard time being truthful.
"We have done so much in the last 2 years, and it doesn't happen by standing around with your finger in your ear, hoping everyone thinks that that's nice." - Donald Rumsfeld
Jason Henderson
blog -
As a muslim .. I'm so sorry about the idea that non-muslims take about islam..Which is caused by some Terror actions... Trollslayer wrote: Its not as if what they do is anything to do with Islam - look at the number of muslims they kill along with everyone else Yes..We must distinguish: Islam <> Some bad actions done by some muslims.(like Qieda) judism <> what Israeli soldiers do in Palestine. Christianity <> innocent ppl that the american army kills Islam <> terrorism judaism <>Zionism Christianity <> injustice. I wish you've got the idea though my bad English.
-
Al Qaida commander 'anticipates' 100,000 Americans dead in attack ... In regard to rumors about a large-scale attack against the U.S. during the month of Ramadan, Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. He added that he "anticipates, but will not swear, that the attack will happen during Ramadan." He further stated that the attack will be carried out in a way that will "amaze the world and turn Al Qaida into [an organization that] horrifies the world until the law of Allah is implemented, actually implemented, and not just in words, on His land... You wait and see that the balance of power between Al Qaida and its rivals will change, all of a sudden, Allah willing." http://216.26.163.62/2003/me_terror_11_13.html[^] Sounds like they're talking about a nuke. Though, hollow threats are also part of their methods. It would certainly alter things if Al-Queda proved that they had nuclear capability. (BTW, I didn't post this as a sneaky counterargument to the "Bush/Clinton is scaring us into despotism" post immediately preceeding this one.) ------------------------------------------ The ousted but stubbornly non-dead leader reportedly released an audiotape this weekend, ending by calling on Iraqis to, quote, "resist the occupation in any way you can, from writing on walls, to boycotting, to demonstrating and taking up arms." adding, "you know, pretty much anything I used to kill you for." - The Daily Show
<Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Where is Al Gore when we need him? I've been told he can single-handedly stop terrorism before it starts. ;P </Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Seriously... If we did to Afghanistan what we did for 3000 lives lost and did to Iraq what we did for [pick your reason(s) or lack thereof] what are we capable of if 100,000 lives are taken? All I've ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work.
-
Al Qaida commander 'anticipates' 100,000 Americans dead in attack ... In regard to rumors about a large-scale attack against the U.S. during the month of Ramadan, Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. He added that he "anticipates, but will not swear, that the attack will happen during Ramadan." He further stated that the attack will be carried out in a way that will "amaze the world and turn Al Qaida into [an organization that] horrifies the world until the law of Allah is implemented, actually implemented, and not just in words, on His land... You wait and see that the balance of power between Al Qaida and its rivals will change, all of a sudden, Allah willing." http://216.26.163.62/2003/me_terror_11_13.html[^] Sounds like they're talking about a nuke. Though, hollow threats are also part of their methods. It would certainly alter things if Al-Queda proved that they had nuclear capability. (BTW, I didn't post this as a sneaky counterargument to the "Bush/Clinton is scaring us into despotism" post immediately preceeding this one.) ------------------------------------------ The ousted but stubbornly non-dead leader reportedly released an audiotape this weekend, ending by calling on Iraqis to, quote, "resist the occupation in any way you can, from writing on walls, to boycotting, to demonstrating and taking up arms." adding, "you know, pretty much anything I used to kill you for." - The Daily Show
Brit wrote: Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. So let's do a hypothetical here. So let's say 200,000 americans die in another attack, two "large" attacks in a span of 3 years. To totally destroy America it will take them at least 140 years.:rolleyes: So in order to be more "productive" a strike against Washington DC would where I would place my money on the proposed target. If this story is true. Later, JoeSox One thing vampire children have to be taught early on is, don't run with wooden stakes. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts www.joeswammi.com ↔ www.humanaiproject.org
-
<Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Where is Al Gore when we need him? I've been told he can single-handedly stop terrorism before it starts. ;P </Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Seriously... If we did to Afghanistan what we did for 3000 lives lost and did to Iraq what we did for [pick your reason(s) or lack thereof] what are we capable of if 100,000 lives are taken? All I've ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work.
Mike Mullikin wrote: Where is Al Gore when we need him? where's the :middle finger: icon? ImgSource | CheeseWeasle
-
hspc wrote: I wish you've got the idea though my bad English. Basically, a whole bunch of idiots can take a good idea like religion and completely fuck it up for everyone. :-D Eco
Eco Jones wrote: Basically, a whole bunch of idiots can take a good idea like religion and completely f*** it up for everyone. sure I didn't post this for real idiots that don't believe any religion ,, thinking that they live to eat,drink,have sex,,
-
<Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Where is Al Gore when we need him? I've been told he can single-handedly stop terrorism before it starts. ;P </Jokingly Abuse Chris L Mode> Seriously... If we did to Afghanistan what we did for 3000 lives lost and did to Iraq what we did for [pick your reason(s) or lack thereof] what are we capable of if 100,000 lives are taken? All I've ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work.
Mike Mullikin wrote: If we did to Afghanistan what we did for 3000 lives lost and did to Iraq what we did for [pick your reason(s) or lack thereof] what are we capable of if 100,000 lives are taken? That is a very interesting question. What response can you give to the use of weapons of mass destruction against a civilian population? In the cold war, the answer was simple. Russian nuked the US, the US nuked the Russians. Against terrorist groups, you are rather stuck for options. The US has probably done all it can in Afghanistan. Against an enemy who has no fixed location, it is very hard to retaliate in measures that are approriate. Unless you had evidence that a country was behind it, you are rather stuck for a response. All you can do is hunt down those behind it, but as we have seen since 9/11 - the bastards are very hard to find. Michael 'Logic, my dear Zoe, merely enables one to be wrong with authority.' - The Doctor: The Wheel in Space
-
Al Qaida commander 'anticipates' 100,000 Americans dead in attack ... In regard to rumors about a large-scale attack against the U.S. during the month of Ramadan, Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. He added that he "anticipates, but will not swear, that the attack will happen during Ramadan." He further stated that the attack will be carried out in a way that will "amaze the world and turn Al Qaida into [an organization that] horrifies the world until the law of Allah is implemented, actually implemented, and not just in words, on His land... You wait and see that the balance of power between Al Qaida and its rivals will change, all of a sudden, Allah willing." http://216.26.163.62/2003/me_terror_11_13.html[^] Sounds like they're talking about a nuke. Though, hollow threats are also part of their methods. It would certainly alter things if Al-Queda proved that they had nuclear capability. (BTW, I didn't post this as a sneaky counterargument to the "Bush/Clinton is scaring us into despotism" post immediately preceeding this one.) ------------------------------------------ The ousted but stubbornly non-dead leader reportedly released an audiotape this weekend, ending by calling on Iraqis to, quote, "resist the occupation in any way you can, from writing on walls, to boycotting, to demonstrating and taking up arms." adding, "you know, pretty much anything I used to kill you for." - The Daily Show
This is furthur proof that we need to track down Al Qaida in whatever country they are and kill every last one of them. John
-
Brit wrote: Al-Hijazi said that "a huge and very courageous strike" will take place and that the number of infidels expected to be killed in this attack, according to primary estimates, exceeds 100,000. So let's do a hypothetical here. So let's say 200,000 americans die in another attack, two "large" attacks in a span of 3 years. To totally destroy America it will take them at least 140 years.:rolleyes: So in order to be more "productive" a strike against Washington DC would where I would place my money on the proposed target. If this story is true. Later, JoeSox One thing vampire children have to be taught early on is, don't run with wooden stakes. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts www.joeswammi.com ↔ www.humanaiproject.org
JoeSox wrote: So in order to be more "productive" a strike against Washington DC would where I would place my money on the proposed target. IMO, New York would be a better target. In Washington you'd only be killing political types, we can always find more of them. Hitting Wall Street would do a lot more damage to the US, especially with the EMP effect. Michael 'Logic, my dear Zoe, merely enables one to be wrong with authority.' - The Doctor: The Wheel in Space
-
As a muslim .. I'm so sorry about the idea that non-muslims take about islam..Which is caused by some Terror actions... Trollslayer wrote: Its not as if what they do is anything to do with Islam - look at the number of muslims they kill along with everyone else Yes..We must distinguish: Islam <> Some bad actions done by some muslims.(like Qieda) judism <> what Israeli soldiers do in Palestine. Christianity <> innocent ppl that the american army kills Islam <> terrorism judaism <>Zionism Christianity <> injustice. I wish you've got the idea though my bad English.
-
hspc wrote: I wish you've got the idea though my bad English No excuse for <> though. != please ;)
good one.. you cool the air by this post :)
-
good one.. you cool the air by this post :)
-
antbates wrote: Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I think it is a good thing:) antbates wrote: Anyway, many apologies, just couldn't resist. why apology? didn't i say that it's a good thing ?;P
-
This is furthur proof that we need to track down Al Qaida in whatever country they are and kill every last one of them. John
John M. Drescher wrote: This is furthur proof that we need to track down Al Qaid ok .. Bush persuaded you. John M. Drescher wrote: in whatever country they are and kill every last one of them. I think your search should be more precise.. even if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents.
-
John M. Drescher wrote: This is furthur proof that we need to track down Al Qaid ok .. Bush persuaded you. John M. Drescher wrote: in whatever country they are and kill every last one of them. I think your search should be more precise.. even if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents.
hspc wrote: Bush persuaded you. I am very glad we have a President with the balls to tackle the problem instead of kissing ass through diplomatic relations that have obviously failed miserable. hspc wrote: if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents. I have two thoughts on this one. It is very hard to tell who are innocents with suicide bombers. The other thing is this is a War that was declared by the other side. In war you have to defend yourself by aggressively tracking down and eliminating the enemy. John
-
hspc wrote: Bush persuaded you. I am very glad we have a President with the balls to tackle the problem instead of kissing ass through diplomatic relations that have obviously failed miserable. hspc wrote: if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents. I have two thoughts on this one. It is very hard to tell who are innocents with suicide bombers. The other thing is this is a War that was declared by the other side. In war you have to defend yourself by aggressively tracking down and eliminating the enemy. John
John M. Drescher wrote: I am very glad we have a President with the balls to tackle the problem instead of kissing ass through diplomatic relations that have obviously failed miserable. 50+% of americans will vote against him in the coming election.. wht are not they happy with him ? John M. Drescher wrote: The other thing is this is a War that was declared by the other side i don't agree ,, but anyway .. just let your Bush declare frankly that this is a foolish revenge..not (A war for democracy)
-
John M. Drescher wrote: This is furthur proof that we need to track down Al Qaid ok .. Bush persuaded you. John M. Drescher wrote: in whatever country they are and kill every last one of them. I think your search should be more precise.. even if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents.
hspc wrote: I think your search should be more precise.. even if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents. Tell that to Al-Queda and its millions of supporters in the Middle East.
"We have done so much in the last 2 years, and it doesn't happen by standing around with your finger in your ear, hoping everyone thinks that that's nice." - Donald Rumsfeld
Jason Henderson
blog -
Eco Jones wrote: Basically, a whole bunch of idiots can take a good idea like religion and completely f*** it up for everyone. sure I didn't post this for real idiots that don't believe any religion ,, thinking that they live to eat,drink,have sex,,
hspc wrote: real idiots that don't believe any religion ,, thinking that they live to eat,drink,have sex,, Why do you live then? Regards, Rohit Sinha Browsy
Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person. - Mother Teresa
-
hspc wrote: I think your search should be more precise.. even if you fight terrorism, no excuse for killing innocents. Tell that to Al-Queda and its millions of supporters in the Middle East.
"We have done so much in the last 2 years, and it doesn't happen by standing around with your finger in your ear, hoping everyone thinks that that's nice." - Donald Rumsfeld
Jason Henderson
blogin a previous post in this thread i showed that I don't support terrorism.. Jason Henderson wrote: millions of supporters in the Middle East USA succeeded to make all this support for Al-Queda .. when Bush declared that the war in Afghanstan is a christian war..