Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. VC1.52 and VC6.0 on same PC?

VC1.52 and VC6.0 on same PC?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
17 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Henrik Husted

    Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Alvaro Mendez
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Don't worry, your PC will not be sucked back to the dark ages. :-D I've recently installed VC 1.52 myself on my NT4.0 box here at work :(, and no problems whatsover :). Since it's a 16-bit app meant to work on Windows 3.1, it installs the system DLLs under the %SystemRoot%\System folder (instead of System32). So there are no conflicts and you should be fine. Happy 16-bit coding! Alvaro :bob:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Henrik Husted

      Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      I haven't tried this with VC 6.0 on Win2000, but I did run VC 4.2 with VC 1.52c on NT 4.0 (SP3) a few years back without any problems. It would probably be wise to install VC 1.52 first though, just in case... Andy Metcalfe - Sonardyne International Ltd
      (andy.metcalfe@lineone.net)
      http://www.resorg.co.uk

      "I'm just another 'S' bend in the internet. A ton of stuff goes through my system, and some of the hairer, stickier and lumpier stuff sticks." - Chris Maunder (I just couldn't let that one past ;))

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Henrik Husted

        Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Joe OConnor
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        It installs and works OK, I needed it for some work on a DOS based Hand Held Terminal. My Win2k machine aint got IE6, but I can't see that giving it grief. Joe.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Meech

          Just off the top of my head, whether it will install is likely moot anyway. To me using VC1.52, implies that you want to develop/debug 16 bit Windows or perhaps some old DOS code. I wouldn't even begin to do that on a Win2K or NT machine. Hopefully you have a Win95 machine around still or even better some very old diskettes labelled Windows 3.11 :) Chris

          H Offline
          H Offline
          Henrik Husted
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Fark, all PC's available are running Win2k. Install Win3.11? Wonder if nvidia has Win3.11 drivers for my gfx card :)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Henrik Husted

            Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOP
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Since VC1.52 doesn't need IE for its help system, and the MFC DLL's have different names than those of VC6, it should not conflict. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Henrik Husted

              Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I have both installed on my machine right now. I needed a little app that accessed the 16 bit network functions for our customers who run our app under 95/98. Works fine. "War is hell" William Tecumseh Sherman.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Henrik Husted

                Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jim A Johnson
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                I can't speak to your precise situation, but I have VC 5.0 and VC 1.52 on one of my machines, and they coexist perfectly. There are no shared components.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Henrik Husted

                  Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  Henrik Husted
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Okay, I installed it and... well.... it works :) My project compiles and all. But man, I'm really going to miss VC6. Thanks for the quick response. .Henrik

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Henrik Husted

                    Hi guys I have tried my best to delay this but it looks like I have to install VC1.52 to maintain some very old code (note to self: make more coffee, it's going to be a long night). Have any of you tried to install VC1.52 on a Win2k with VC6, IE6 etc. The last thing I want is to install VC1.52 only to find my PC bombed back to 1993. TIA .Henrik

                    H Offline
                    H Offline
                    Henrik Husted
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    [rant] I installed VC1.52 because I needed to debug a DOS application but does VC include a DOS debugger? Well yes, it includes CodeView for MS-DOS which is properly the worst debugger I ever had the misfortune to lay my hands on. *sigh* Or maybe I'm just a young punk who never had to debug a 10^6 punch cards using nothing but a comb and a piece of string. On a sunday. At 3am. [/rant] I'm better now. Now where did I put the SoftICE installations disk?

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Henrik Husted

                      [rant] I installed VC1.52 because I needed to debug a DOS application but does VC include a DOS debugger? Well yes, it includes CodeView for MS-DOS which is properly the worst debugger I ever had the misfortune to lay my hands on. *sigh* Or maybe I'm just a young punk who never had to debug a 10^6 punch cards using nothing but a comb and a piece of string. On a sunday. At 3am. [/rant] I'm better now. Now where did I put the SoftICE installations disk?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Salter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Nice though CodeView is ;) does it (or SoftICE) work on NT/2K? Dave.

                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Henrik Husted

                        Okay, I installed it and... well.... it works :) My project compiles and all. But man, I'm really going to miss VC6. Thanks for the quick response. .Henrik

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        I use the VC1.52 compiler with an external makefile that I 'wrap' in the VC6 IDE. This way I can use the VC6 environment and Visual Assist, Wndtabs, etc., while working on old stuff. This also works with my 8051/68HC11 embedded cross compilers. Steven J. Ackerman, Consultant ACS, Sarasota, FL http://www.acscontrol.com steve@acscontrol.com sja@gte.net

                        realJSOPR H 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I use the VC1.52 compiler with an external makefile that I 'wrap' in the VC6 IDE. This way I can use the VC6 environment and Visual Assist, Wndtabs, etc., while working on old stuff. This also works with my 8051/68HC11 embedded cross compilers. Steven J. Ackerman, Consultant ACS, Sarasota, FL http://www.acscontrol.com steve@acscontrol.com sja@gte.net

                          realJSOPR Offline
                          realJSOPR Offline
                          realJSOP
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          That would make GREAT article on CodeProject. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D David Salter

                            Nice though CodeView is ;) does it (or SoftICE) work on NT/2K? Dave.

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            Henrik Husted
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            I haven't used SoftICE on Win2k yet. It works perfect in NT4 however. .Henrik

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              I use the VC1.52 compiler with an external makefile that I 'wrap' in the VC6 IDE. This way I can use the VC6 environment and Visual Assist, Wndtabs, etc., while working on old stuff. This also works with my 8051/68HC11 embedded cross compilers. Steven J. Ackerman, Consultant ACS, Sarasota, FL http://www.acscontrol.com steve@acscontrol.com sja@gte.net

                              H Offline
                              H Offline
                              Henrik Husted
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Hmmm... good idea. I agree with John, this would make an excellent article (hint hint) :) .Henrik

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Henrik Husted

                                Hmmm... good idea. I agree with John, this would make an excellent article (hint hint) :) .Henrik

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                OK. I'll take the hints ! ;) I haven't submitted anything before, so it will take me a little bit to pull this together. I can't include the actual code for the projects, but I can provide a couple of samples of the relevant makefiles and instructions for how they get 'wrapped'. Thanks for the prompting. Steven J. Ackerman, Consultant ACS, Sarasota, FL http://www.acscontrol.com steve@acscontrol.com sja@gte.net

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups