Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. DOJ, Microsoft settle

DOJ, Microsoft settle

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comhelp
12 Posts 11 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RaviBeeR RaviBee

    http://money.cnn.com/2001/11/02/technology/microsoft/ "There is always one more bug..." ravib@ravib.com http://www.ravib.com

    T Offline
    T Offline
    Tim Smith
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I can easily see this hurting the end user and 3rd party developers in the long run. Having MS supply everyone with the source for the "middleware" might just make MS stop all middleware development. No more ODBC, TAPI, MAPI, ADO, etc. Developers will start developing for MS application interfaces only and everyone else gets totally shut out. Will be interesting. But this might turn into the government once again getting into things it has not business getting into and screwing over the end user. Many years ago there was a law that required banks to have a certain percentage of minority loans. So what did the big banks do? They raided all the minority banks of their good accounts with sweetheart deals leaving the minority banks with less quality accounts. This sent many minority banks into the red. End result? Less minority owned banks and worse banking options in minority areas. Which is the EXACT opposite effect they wanted to have. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • RaviBeeR RaviBee

      http://money.cnn.com/2001/11/02/technology/microsoft/ "There is always one more bug..." ravib@ravib.com http://www.ravib.com

      H Offline
      H Offline
      Henry Jacobs
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      ...imposes a broad range of restrictions ... which would be upheld by an independent, on-site, three-member panel of computer experts. I'm interested to see who these "experts" are.

      M D F 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • H Henry Jacobs

        ...imposes a broad range of restrictions ... which would be upheld by an independent, on-site, three-member panel of computer experts. I'm interested to see who these "experts" are.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Michael P Butler
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I wonder where I can apply for the job. All that lovely power in my hands .... hahahah Michael :-)

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Michael P Butler

          I wonder where I can apply for the job. All that lovely power in my hands .... hahahah Michael :-)

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Alvaro Mendez
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Hmmmm, the problem is having to turn down those million-dollar "donations" directly deposited to a Swiss bank account, courtesy of our dear friends from the Gates estate... :-) Regards, Alvaro

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Henry Jacobs

            ...imposes a broad range of restrictions ... which would be upheld by an independent, on-site, three-member panel of computer experts. I'm interested to see who these "experts" are.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            David Cunningham
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Chris Maunder, John Simmons, and Michael Martin are my bets. ;) David http://www.dundas.com

            C P 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D David Cunningham

              Chris Maunder, John Simmons, and Michael Martin are my bets. ;) David http://www.dundas.com

              C Offline
              C Offline
              ColinDavies
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Chris Maunder, John Simmons, and Michael Martin are my bets. Wow that's real diversity, ( No I won't allow myself to elaborate ) Regardz Colin J Davies colin@vmtu.com Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
              C> copy con phuckall.bat goto begin F 200 L1000 0 A CS:100 mov ax,301 mov bx,200 mov cx,1 mov dx,80 int 13 int 20 g q :begin debug < phuckall.bat C> phuckall

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Henry Jacobs

                ...imposes a broad range of restrictions ... which would be upheld by an independent, on-site, three-member panel of computer experts. I'm interested to see who these "experts" are.

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Fazlul Kabir
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Computer experts? Sounds more like a gang of software police hanging over Bill's shoulder. // Fazlul


                Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • RaviBeeR RaviBee

                  http://money.cnn.com/2001/11/02/technology/microsoft/ "There is always one more bug..." ravib@ravib.com http://www.ravib.com

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jim A Johnson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  let's hope the states don't let them off so easily.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Alvaro Mendez

                    Hmmmm, the problem is having to turn down those million-dollar "donations" directly deposited to a Swiss bank account, courtesy of our dear friends from the Gates estate... :-) Regards, Alvaro

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Michael P Butler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    I'm willing to put up with that burden for the good of the IT Industry :-) For my first act, I will help Linux to compete better with Microsoft Windows. I'll force Linux to become closed source so that it is on an even playing field with Window :-) Michael :-)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Tim Smith

                      I can easily see this hurting the end user and 3rd party developers in the long run. Having MS supply everyone with the source for the "middleware" might just make MS stop all middleware development. No more ODBC, TAPI, MAPI, ADO, etc. Developers will start developing for MS application interfaces only and everyone else gets totally shut out. Will be interesting. But this might turn into the government once again getting into things it has not business getting into and screwing over the end user. Many years ago there was a law that required banks to have a certain percentage of minority loans. So what did the big banks do? They raided all the minority banks of their good accounts with sweetheart deals leaving the minority banks with less quality accounts. This sent many minority banks into the red. End result? Less minority owned banks and worse banking options in minority areas. Which is the EXACT opposite effect they wanted to have. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      No more ODBC, TAPI, MAPI, ADO, Just a short comment but I doubt very much MS will ditch middleware what with ADO.NET now being such a big focus (and selling point) of .NET. I may be totally wrong in applying ADO.NET to your statement though :) regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge "In other words, the developer is dealing with an elephant, the accountant is dealing with a bunny rabbit." by Stan Shannon - 16/10/2001

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D David Cunningham

                        Chris Maunder, John Simmons, and Michael Martin are my bets. ;) David http://www.dundas.com

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Parish 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Since these 3 wise men (as W2K News called them) have to be fair, unbiased, and impartial, how about Linus Torvalds, Scott McNealy, and Marc Andreesson? while (!asleep) code();

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups