Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. A Different Question

A Different Question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondiscussion
33 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Henry Jacobs

    John McIlroy wrote: If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries. A lot of really successful corporations began in a garage. I'm sure Christianity will make it some day too. ;P

    J Offline
    J Offline
    John McIlroy
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Ahhh... I wish I didn't have an exam tomorrow. I always enjoy a little give and take with the materialists and the gaping holes in their reasoning, but tonight is not a good night. Maybe we can continue this a little later!!! JM

    D H 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J John McIlroy

      Ahhh... I wish I didn't have an exam tomorrow. I always enjoy a little give and take with the materialists and the gaping holes in their reasoning, but tonight is not a good night. Maybe we can continue this a little later!!! JM

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David Wulff
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      John McIlroy wrote: I always enjoy a little give and take with the materialists and the gaping holes in their reasoning Can you believe this guy? John, you have yet to provide one single argument which cannot be - by your own double standards - reliably countered. I should say from that that you are the one with gaping holes in your reasoning, or an inability to effectively communicate them. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "I loathe people who keep dogs. They are cowards who haven't got the guts to bite people themselves" - August Strindberg

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        Henry Jacobs wrote: I mean science defying miracles like parting the red sea, not child birth and the like. So do I. Henry Jacobs wrote: I do not consider finding god, peace, or whatever a miracle. It's not, it's an emotional experience caused by chemical reactions in our minds. That's why so many people experience it in so many different contexts, void of real proof. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

        Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

        I live in Bob's HungOut now

        H Offline
        H Offline
        Henry Jacobs
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        What science defying miracles are you refering to?

        D M 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • J John McIlroy

          Ahhh... I wish I didn't have an exam tomorrow. I always enjoy a little give and take with the materialists and the gaping holes in their reasoning, but tonight is not a good night. Maybe we can continue this a little later!!! JM

          H Offline
          H Offline
          Henry Jacobs
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          I never said I was a materialist but since you believe I am then explain how my reasoning possesses any more holes than yours? (When you get back of course. ;))

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David Wulff

            John McIlroy wrote: I always enjoy a little give and take with the materialists and the gaping holes in their reasoning Can you believe this guy? John, you have yet to provide one single argument which cannot be - by your own double standards - reliably countered. I should say from that that you are the one with gaping holes in your reasoning, or an inability to effectively communicate them. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "I loathe people who keep dogs. They are cowards who haven't got the guts to bite people themselves" - August Strindberg

            J Offline
            J Offline
            John McIlroy
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            david So far your argument is that because some religious people believed 600 years ago that the sun revolved around the earth, and science proved it wrong... that we can make infinite extrapolations that science is going to prove every religious truth to be bogus. Your other point is that we can be 100% certain that the only reality is a physical reality, even though we have no comprehensive phyical explantion for countless things... stretching from the microcosm to the macrocosm and especially in the realm of human behaviour. Like most materialists who have gone before you... you end up assuming that which you are trying to prove. Siiggghhh! The fact that you have no physical explanation for the majority of human experience seems not to slow you down one tiny bit in ensuring us that without doubt ultimate reality is 100% physical. Like I said... when the scientists come us with a physical model that explains volition (for example)... I'll start throwing out my rosaries. Until then... Hail Mary full of grace! JM

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J John McIlroy

              david So far your argument is that because some religious people believed 600 years ago that the sun revolved around the earth, and science proved it wrong... that we can make infinite extrapolations that science is going to prove every religious truth to be bogus. Your other point is that we can be 100% certain that the only reality is a physical reality, even though we have no comprehensive phyical explantion for countless things... stretching from the microcosm to the macrocosm and especially in the realm of human behaviour. Like most materialists who have gone before you... you end up assuming that which you are trying to prove. Siiggghhh! The fact that you have no physical explanation for the majority of human experience seems not to slow you down one tiny bit in ensuring us that without doubt ultimate reality is 100% physical. Like I said... when the scientists come us with a physical model that explains volition (for example)... I'll start throwing out my rosaries. Until then... Hail Mary full of grace! JM

              D Offline
              D Offline
              David Wulff
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              Look mate, I really need sleep now, so this will be brief. We can continue this in the morning (or rather the afternoon)... So far your argument is that because some religious people believed 600 years ago that the sun revolved around the earth, and science proved it wrong... that we can make infinite extrapolations that science is going to prove every religious truth to be bogus. If you believe that is what my argument is, or is even based on, then you need to re-read all forty nine of tonight’s posts. My belief is the complete opposite. That particular example was used purely to show how people – not science – have been able to justify a fact till the sun comes down, but still be wrong. Your other point is that we can be 100% certain that the only reality is a physical reality, even though we have no comprehensive phyical explantion for countless things... stretching from the microcosm to the macrocosm and especially in the realm of human behaviour. Again, you are placing words in my mouth (supposedly). I said that we cannot be 100% certain, but that does not mean that you are 100% correct. Naivety is what that is called, and naivety is what it is. On either side. Like most materialists who have gone before you... you end up assuming that which you are trying to prove. Siiggghhh! Firstly, I am not a materialist, I am a realist. I evaluate all of the evidence available to me and draw my own conclusions. Secondly, I have not assumed one thing tonight that I cannot provide accepted scientific proof for – even that which has been accepted by religious men. The fact that you have no physical explanation for the majority of human experience seems not to slow you down one tiny bit in ensuring us that without doubt ultimate reality is 100% physical. Look, mate, I don’t know which David Wulff you’ve been talking to tonight, but it hasn’t been me. If anything, the opposite has been your argument. In fact, my points have not even been mentioned. Like I said... when the scientists come us with a physical model that explains volition (for example)... I'll start throwing out my rosaries. No you wouldn’t, and saying that is nothing more than a futile attempt to try to show open-mindedness. I have said (in practically every reply), and provided accepted scientific proof, that you would not change your beliefs if you have true faith. You can – as you have been shoeing tonight – find justifications in anything. ------ Right, that IS it – I am go

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Henry Jacobs

                What science defying miracles are you refering to?

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David Wulff
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                How about the ability for a man to piss though a six inch hole at a distance of more than ten feet? ;) ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "I loathe people who keep dogs. They are cowards who haven't got the guts to bite people themselves" - August Strindberg

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David Wulff

                  How about the ability for a man to piss though a six inch hole at a distance of more than ten feet? ;) ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "I loathe people who keep dogs. They are cowards who haven't got the guts to bite people themselves" - August Strindberg

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Daniel Ferguson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  Hmmm.. that does sound truly miraculous. :omg: I'm not sure if I should ask if there's a story behind it, though.... "das leid schlaft in der maschine" -Einstürzende Neubauten

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Daniel Ferguson

                    We've had a few religious threads today, but I want to ask a slightly different question. Obviously different people have different beliefs and we are not going to change each other's minds with a simple discussion in the Lounge. I have my own beliefs and I don't agree with some other people, but I accept that as a normal part of life. (I'm also not so uncertain of my beliefs that I need others to validate them.) So here is my question: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? The sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? Some of these people take it to the extreme. Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. Some brainwash others with their own beliefs. Some just go door to door. And some just try to convert their friends. Where do you draw the line? "Let me burn you down." -"Religion" by Front 242

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    Tibor Blazko
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    before years came to our gate two jehovists with: we want to speak with you father said them: ok we can talk for hours but at first here is spade and there is garden - we all will spend hour there at first to make enought time for discussion in 3 miliseconds they were at neighbours and they fighthed with them so long as neighbours before us t!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Henry Jacobs

                      What science defying miracles are you refering to?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mike Burston
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      Don't ask. Christian always says this - he has experienced miracles, including faith healing. Then he backs away from providing details. Says that he can't actually provide verified evidence, so we have to just believe that he has indeed seen miracles. I haven't pushed him too hard on this because it seems he is reluctant to get into the details, and I give him the benefit of the doubt and assume there is a "personal" dimension here that he'd rather not discuss in an open, public, forum. Christian, I wish you'd either stop saying this, or start posting some details (and verification) of these miracles. ----------------------------- "I leave no turn un-stoned." - John Simmons, Nov 6 2001 -----------------------------

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups