Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. 'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'

'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomquestiondiscussion
19 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rhys__666
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

    B A D P J 8 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Rhys__666

      'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      benjymous
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I guess all I can say is "well duh!" America itself has stronger links with Al Qaeda than Saddam does -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Phoenix Paint - back from DPaint's ashes!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rhys__666

        'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Alvaro Mendez
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        "But, but, Saddam had the capabilities to create WMDs. Look, we can't be sending mixed messages. Oh, and don't forget about Poland!" :) Regards, Alvaro


        Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we. - George W. Bush

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rhys__666

          'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Bennett
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          This will be shocking news for FoxNews viewers everywhere.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rhys__666

            'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            pseudonym67
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            You are obviously some sort of confused pinko liberal who cannot read straight the words wot Rummy said otherwise you would know that you were simply misunderstooderating his words wot he said. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1320129,00.html[^] pseudonym67 My Articles[^] "They say there are strangers who threaten us, In our immigrants and infidels. They say there is strangeness too dangerous In our theaters and bookstore shelves. That those who know what's best for us Must rise and save us from ourselves." Rush

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rhys__666

              'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jason Henderson
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Can someone post a link to his original testimony before the CFR? I'd like to see his full statement before jumping to conclusions. Here is his retraction[^].

              "Live long and prosper." - Spock

              Jason Henderson
              blog

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rhys__666

                'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jason Henderson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I found a link to the full transcript[^]. QUESTIONER: My name is Glenn Hutchins. Mr. Secretary, what exactly was the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda? Here's what Rummsfeld said: I tell you, I'm not going to answer the question. I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence community over the period of a year in the most amazing way. Second, there are differences in the intelligence community as to what the relationship was. To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two. There are--I just read an intelligence report recently about one person who's connected to al Qaeda, who was in and out of Iraq, and there's the most tortured description of why he might have had a relationship, and why he might not have had a relationship. There are reports about people in Saddam Hussein's intelligence service meeting in one country or another with al Qaeda people from one person to another, which may have been indicative of something, or may not have been. It may have been something that was not representative of a hard linkage. What we do know is that Saddam Hussein was on the terrorist list. We do know they were giving $25,000 to suicide bombers. So, this is not the Little Sisters of the Poor. [Laughter.] But, what I would--to answer it, when I'm in Washington, I pull out a piece of paper and say, I don't know, because I'm not in that business, but I'll tell you what the CIA thinks, and I read it--the public version of it. If you want a--not terribly current now, but [former Director of Central Intelligence] George Tenet did testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a version of it was unclassified--declassified--later which you can get and read if you want to see the answer that he gave. But it is--it is--the relationships between these folks are complicated. They evolve and change over time. In many cases, these different networks have common funders. In many cases, they cooperate not in a chain of command, but in a loose affiliation--a franchising arrangement almost, where they go do different things and cooperate, but they're not, in the case of al Qaeda, most--my impression is, most of the senior people have actually sw

                B K J 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • R Rhys__666

                  'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  KaRl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Where's the surprize? Rumsfeld states an evidence. "Widely circulated reports said that Muhammad Atta, a mastermind of the September 11 attacks, met an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague. And fleeing al-Qaeda members reportedly took refuge in Iraq. But U.S. officials say they doubt that the Atta meeting took place, and many experts and State Department officials say that any al-Qaeda presence in Iraq probably was in northern regions of the country beyond Saddam’s control. Some analysts say there was scant evidence of ties between al-Qaeda and Saddam’s secular regime, a claim supported by the lack of such evidence found after Saddam’s downfall. The CIA in May 2003 began an internal review of prewar intelligence reports, including those related to suspected connections between Iraq and terrorism."


                  Fold With Us! "I hated going to weddings. All the grandmas would poke me saying "You're next". They stopped that when I started doing it to them at funerals."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jason Henderson

                    I found a link to the full transcript[^]. QUESTIONER: My name is Glenn Hutchins. Mr. Secretary, what exactly was the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda? Here's what Rummsfeld said: I tell you, I'm not going to answer the question. I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence community over the period of a year in the most amazing way. Second, there are differences in the intelligence community as to what the relationship was. To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two. There are--I just read an intelligence report recently about one person who's connected to al Qaeda, who was in and out of Iraq, and there's the most tortured description of why he might have had a relationship, and why he might not have had a relationship. There are reports about people in Saddam Hussein's intelligence service meeting in one country or another with al Qaeda people from one person to another, which may have been indicative of something, or may not have been. It may have been something that was not representative of a hard linkage. What we do know is that Saddam Hussein was on the terrorist list. We do know they were giving $25,000 to suicide bombers. So, this is not the Little Sisters of the Poor. [Laughter.] But, what I would--to answer it, when I'm in Washington, I pull out a piece of paper and say, I don't know, because I'm not in that business, but I'll tell you what the CIA thinks, and I read it--the public version of it. If you want a--not terribly current now, but [former Director of Central Intelligence] George Tenet did testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a version of it was unclassified--declassified--later which you can get and read if you want to see the answer that he gave. But it is--it is--the relationships between these folks are complicated. They evolve and change over time. In many cases, these different networks have common funders. In many cases, they cooperate not in a chain of command, but in a loose affiliation--a franchising arrangement almost, where they go do different things and cooperate, but they're not, in the case of al Qaeda, most--my impression is, most of the senior people have actually sw

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    brianwelsch
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    thanks, Jason. BW The Biggest Loser


                    "Farm Donkey makes us laugh.
                    Farm Donkey hauls some ass."
                    -The Stoves

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jason Henderson

                      I found a link to the full transcript[^]. QUESTIONER: My name is Glenn Hutchins. Mr. Secretary, what exactly was the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda? Here's what Rummsfeld said: I tell you, I'm not going to answer the question. I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence community over the period of a year in the most amazing way. Second, there are differences in the intelligence community as to what the relationship was. To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two. There are--I just read an intelligence report recently about one person who's connected to al Qaeda, who was in and out of Iraq, and there's the most tortured description of why he might have had a relationship, and why he might not have had a relationship. There are reports about people in Saddam Hussein's intelligence service meeting in one country or another with al Qaeda people from one person to another, which may have been indicative of something, or may not have been. It may have been something that was not representative of a hard linkage. What we do know is that Saddam Hussein was on the terrorist list. We do know they were giving $25,000 to suicide bombers. So, this is not the Little Sisters of the Poor. [Laughter.] But, what I would--to answer it, when I'm in Washington, I pull out a piece of paper and say, I don't know, because I'm not in that business, but I'll tell you what the CIA thinks, and I read it--the public version of it. If you want a--not terribly current now, but [former Director of Central Intelligence] George Tenet did testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a version of it was unclassified--declassified--later which you can get and read if you want to see the answer that he gave. But it is--it is--the relationships between these folks are complicated. They evolve and change over time. In many cases, these different networks have common funders. In many cases, they cooperate not in a chain of command, but in a loose affiliation--a franchising arrangement almost, where they go do different things and cooperate, but they're not, in the case of al Qaeda, most--my impression is, most of the senior people have actually sw

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      KaRl
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      there's some kind of hypocrisy from the US and western governments, who didn't hesitate to finance, support and arm terrorist groups when it fitted their interest. For example, who supported Bin Laden during the 80's? Every western country with some power on the international scene plays the same dirty tricks. Claiming thereafter it's bad is considering us as dumbasses.


                      Fold With Us! "I hated going to weddings. All the grandmas would poke me saying "You're next". They stopped that when I started doing it to them at funerals."

                      B H 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • K KaRl

                        there's some kind of hypocrisy from the US and western governments, who didn't hesitate to finance, support and arm terrorist groups when it fitted their interest. For example, who supported Bin Laden during the 80's? Every western country with some power on the international scene plays the same dirty tricks. Claiming thereafter it's bad is considering us as dumbasses.


                        Fold With Us! "I hated going to weddings. All the grandmas would poke me saying "You're next". They stopped that when I started doing it to them at funerals."

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        brianwelsch
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        K(arl) wrote: Every western country with some power on the international scene plays the same dirty tricks :omg: we are after all only human, n'est-ce pas? BW The Biggest Loser


                        "Farm Donkey makes us laugh.
                        Farm Donkey hauls some ass."
                        -The Stoves

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K KaRl

                          there's some kind of hypocrisy from the US and western governments, who didn't hesitate to finance, support and arm terrorist groups when it fitted their interest. For example, who supported Bin Laden during the 80's? Every western country with some power on the international scene plays the same dirty tricks. Claiming thereafter it's bad is considering us as dumbasses.


                          Fold With Us! "I hated going to weddings. All the grandmas would poke me saying "You're next". They stopped that when I started doing it to them at funerals."

                          H Offline
                          H Offline
                          Henry miller
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Hindsite has terribal tunnel vision. We have to deal with the world as it exists, not as it might be. Who knew in 1980 that Bin Laden would attack the US? Sure we knew he wasn't a nice guy, but he was opposing worse people at the time, so what could be done? The world is far too complex for simple finger pointing to what was done 20 years ago. Perhaps if the US hadn't support Bin Laden the Soviet Union would have made it, and then attacked the US themselves? Extreemly unlikly perhaps, but then in the 80's I don't think it would be reasonable to think that Bin Laden would attack the US. I'll readially admit to not knowing what was known about Bin Laden back then though. Maybe they should have done something different. Since we cannot examine all alternate parrell universes to see which is best, we will never know.

                          C J 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • H Henry miller

                            Hindsite has terribal tunnel vision. We have to deal with the world as it exists, not as it might be. Who knew in 1980 that Bin Laden would attack the US? Sure we knew he wasn't a nice guy, but he was opposing worse people at the time, so what could be done? The world is far too complex for simple finger pointing to what was done 20 years ago. Perhaps if the US hadn't support Bin Laden the Soviet Union would have made it, and then attacked the US themselves? Extreemly unlikly perhaps, but then in the 80's I don't think it would be reasonable to think that Bin Laden would attack the US. I'll readially admit to not knowing what was known about Bin Laden back then though. Maybe they should have done something different. Since we cannot examine all alternate parrell universes to see which is best, we will never know.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            ColinDavies
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Only a fool feeds a venomous snake. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C ColinDavies

                              Only a fool feeds a venomous snake. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Russell Morris
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              ColinDavies wrote: Only a fool feeds a venomous snake. Unless the poisonous snake is the only thing between you and the knife-wielding maniac that's staring you down. Sometimes things are foobar from the beginning. It's certainly not a wholesale justification for any course of action, but we can't look on the past with such tunnel-vision that completely ignores context and what was not reasonably knowable at that point in time. -- Russell Morris "So, broccoli, mother says you're good for me... but I'm afraid I'm no good for you!" - Stewy

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jason Henderson

                                I found a link to the full transcript[^]. QUESTIONER: My name is Glenn Hutchins. Mr. Secretary, what exactly was the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda? Here's what Rummsfeld said: I tell you, I'm not going to answer the question. I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence community over the period of a year in the most amazing way. Second, there are differences in the intelligence community as to what the relationship was. To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two. There are--I just read an intelligence report recently about one person who's connected to al Qaeda, who was in and out of Iraq, and there's the most tortured description of why he might have had a relationship, and why he might not have had a relationship. There are reports about people in Saddam Hussein's intelligence service meeting in one country or another with al Qaeda people from one person to another, which may have been indicative of something, or may not have been. It may have been something that was not representative of a hard linkage. What we do know is that Saddam Hussein was on the terrorist list. We do know they were giving $25,000 to suicide bombers. So, this is not the Little Sisters of the Poor. [Laughter.] But, what I would--to answer it, when I'm in Washington, I pull out a piece of paper and say, I don't know, because I'm not in that business, but I'll tell you what the CIA thinks, and I read it--the public version of it. If you want a--not terribly current now, but [former Director of Central Intelligence] George Tenet did testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a version of it was unclassified--declassified--later which you can get and read if you want to see the answer that he gave. But it is--it is--the relationships between these folks are complicated. They evolve and change over time. In many cases, these different networks have common funders. In many cases, they cooperate not in a chain of command, but in a loose affiliation--a franchising arrangement almost, where they go do different things and cooperate, but they're not, in the case of al Qaeda, most--my impression is, most of the senior people have actually sw

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jeremy Falcon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Hey, don't mix the facts with people's pre-conceived opinions. :) Jeremy Falcon

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Jason Henderson

                                  Can someone post a link to his original testimony before the CFR? I'd like to see his full statement before jumping to conclusions. Here is his retraction[^].

                                  "Live long and prosper." - Spock

                                  Jason Henderson
                                  blog

                                  K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  Kant
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Jason Henderson wrote: Here is his retraction[^]. Argh! Damn! Flip-Flopper ;P
                                  Yesterday is history, Tomorrow is a mystery. Today is a gift -that's why it's called the present
                                  This signature was created by "Code Project Quoter".

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Russell Morris

                                    ColinDavies wrote: Only a fool feeds a venomous snake. Unless the poisonous snake is the only thing between you and the knife-wielding maniac that's staring you down. Sometimes things are foobar from the beginning. It's certainly not a wholesale justification for any course of action, but we can't look on the past with such tunnel-vision that completely ignores context and what was not reasonably knowable at that point in time. -- Russell Morris "So, broccoli, mother says you're good for me... but I'm afraid I'm no good for you!" - Stewy

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    ColinDavies
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    It's also dangerous to stop feeding a snake that you have previously fed. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Rhys__666

                                      'NO AL QAEDA-SADDAM LINK'[^] Opinions? Rhys A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a workstation... Vampireware /n/, a project, capable of sucking the lifeblood out of anyone unfortunate enough to be assigned to it, which never actually sees the light of day, but nonetheless refuses to die.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jan larsen
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Apparently Rumsfeld have flip-flopped, so that today he thinks that there WAS an Al-Qaeda-Saddam link... "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Henry miller

                                        Hindsite has terribal tunnel vision. We have to deal with the world as it exists, not as it might be. Who knew in 1980 that Bin Laden would attack the US? Sure we knew he wasn't a nice guy, but he was opposing worse people at the time, so what could be done? The world is far too complex for simple finger pointing to what was done 20 years ago. Perhaps if the US hadn't support Bin Laden the Soviet Union would have made it, and then attacked the US themselves? Extreemly unlikly perhaps, but then in the 80's I don't think it would be reasonable to think that Bin Laden would attack the US. I'll readially admit to not knowing what was known about Bin Laden back then though. Maybe they should have done something different. Since we cannot examine all alternate parrell universes to see which is best, we will never know.

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        jan larsen
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Who is this mr. Hindsite and why does he have the tunnel vision of mr. Terribal? ;P "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups