Here we go again - part 2
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote: After I gain enough experience, I may even write software tailored for real estate investors as well (AFAIK, they don't have anything like that yet). Typical programmer... ;) Coolness, man! When you're rich, invite me over for a weekend on the yacht! :) Christopher Duncan Today's Corporate Battle Tactic Unite the Tribes: Ending Turf Wars for Career and Business Success The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World
Typical programmer... It's in my blood. Coolness, man! When you're rich, invite me over for a weekend on the yacht! Well, I'm starting small. I just want enough income produced by it to cover my living expenses. That way I can program for fun again. If I do end up with a yacht some how, I'll sail it to Atlanta and bring the :beer:. :) Jeremy Falcon
-
That's actually a smart thing to do, I can forsee in the future technology being more vertical... there will be a need for, say, medical professionals who can program, etc. I've even thoguht about getting an MBA... businesspeople who are tech-savvy can make a ton of money... An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Navin wrote: I've even thoguht about getting an MBA... businesspeople who are tech-savvy can make a ton of money... Since I'm doing an MBA at the moment I guess there is hope for me yet. :-) Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.
-
Typical programmer... It's in my blood. Coolness, man! When you're rich, invite me over for a weekend on the yacht! Well, I'm starting small. I just want enough income produced by it to cover my living expenses. That way I can program for fun again. If I do end up with a yacht some how, I'll sail it to Atlanta and bring the :beer:. :) Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote: If I do end up with a yacht some how, I'll sail it to Atlanta and bring the :beer:. Color me there! :) Christopher Duncan Today's Corporate Battle Tactic Unite the Tribes: Ending Turf Wars for Career and Business Success The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World
-
Okay, this might be more soapbox material - but no more so than the original outsourcing thread. It seems the world is moving toward a more global economy... which means countries like India will see their quiality of life improving as more jobs move into their country. I read a statistic once (can't remember where) that said that the poorest 5% in the US is richer than the richest 95% of the rest of the world. The US economy and people have always been resillient - we will find new ways of making money even if old jobs disappear. So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Navin wrote: So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? Hmmm. Because I'm also one of those whacko people that believes that corporate profits are not the only responsibility of a company. I personally think that businesses have a moral responsibility. And to me, this means looking out for your immediate neighbor first. But I realize this kind of thinking has gone the way of the Dodo bird, if it even ever existed. Look at the American industrial revolution. It was built and the economic wheels turned as a result of "outsourcing" work to children and women because they were cheaper and more complacent than men. Morality, concern for one's fellow human being, had absolutely no place in the cotton mills. It's pretty sad to see history repeat itself with outsourcing (and I don't mean just outsourcing programming jobs). The foundations of outsourcing are driven by greed. The workforce in that industry is also driven by greed--I freely admit that I try to get the highest dollar possible on my contracts so that I can have the best quality of life possible. The problem with my thinking is that it's all me, me, me, without regard for my neighbor, while at the same time I expect corporations to behave morally and to express concern for my neighbor which I, myself, do not. Uh. To get back to the question, outsourcing is bad because it doesn't address the problem of greed and the disparity between those who have and those who don't have. In fact it creates this disparity in two ways, by taking jobs away from people locally, and by giving those jobs to other people which promotes more disparity locally. Certainly places like India and Russia ask the top dollar possible themselves. The only way, and it's quite painful obviously, to break this cycle is for people to simply not be so damn greedy. So the issue of morality falls yet again on my shoulders, not on the corporation to which I would rather pass the morality buck. Well, that's my twisted view of the world. Quack, quack, or whatever sound Dodo's used to make. :-D Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing
-
LOL! I'm learning the ins-and-outs of real estate investing. Right now, I'm studying every there is to know about mortgages, leases, creative financing, etc. To make money at this, I'm going to have to know a lot of info and tricks of the trade, and that's what I plan to do. As long as we have people to want to live, we'll always have a need for real estate. And, it always appreciates in value. [edit] Ok, some times it doesn't, but you have to know your market. [/edit] On top of that, there's insurance to cover you butt in case the property is mutilated. So, all-in-all, it's a pretty safe way to make moola. After I gain enough experience, I may even write software tailored for real estate investors as well (AFAIK, they don't have anything like that yet). Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I'm learning the ins-and-outs of real estate investing. I have been doing that as well. It's amazing how simple some of the alternative systems are and what long term affect they have. Recently I set up a mortgage retailing system for an aquaintance. I was surprised to discover a lot of stuff doing this like how the mortgage wholesalers were still 100% fax communications controlled. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.
-
Okay, this might be more soapbox material - but no more so than the original outsourcing thread. It seems the world is moving toward a more global economy... which means countries like India will see their quiality of life improving as more jobs move into their country. I read a statistic once (can't remember where) that said that the poorest 5% in the US is richer than the richest 95% of the rest of the world. The US economy and people have always been resillient - we will find new ways of making money even if old jobs disappear. So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Bad thing / good thing it's all relative. As others have already pointed out, it's bad for you if it takes your job away, good for you if it gives you a job. Stating that it is fundamentally one or the other is useless - except for those trying to stir up bad feelings towards [concepts | non-protectionist politicians | protectionist politicians | Indians | etc.].
You**'re one microscopic cog** in his catastrophic plan... -
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I'm learning the ins-and-outs of real estate investing. I have been doing that as well. It's amazing how simple some of the alternative systems are and what long term affect they have. Recently I set up a mortgage retailing system for an aquaintance. I was surprised to discover a lot of stuff doing this like how the mortgage wholesalers were still 100% fax communications controlled. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.
Cool. I already became acquaintances with one a really good realtor into investing around the greater New Orleans area, so I’m optimistic about what the future holds. Jeremy Falcon
-
Okay, this might be more soapbox material - but no more so than the original outsourcing thread. It seems the world is moving toward a more global economy... which means countries like India will see their quiality of life improving as more jobs move into their country. I read a statistic once (can't remember where) that said that the poorest 5% in the US is richer than the richest 95% of the rest of the world. The US economy and people have always been resillient - we will find new ways of making money even if old jobs disappear. So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
I would say in the long term it's a good thing but those who have had it comparatively easy (including here in the UK) take the lumps until the global economy settles down more. As an example, the sudden rush to open call centres in India has slowed to a trickle now the supply of good english speaking graduates has been used up. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
And, if MS can claim OSS is communism, then I can say the same thing about a global economy and outsourcing. :) BTW, I don't buy into the fact that outsourcing will save the world. One of the main reasons India is like it is, is because of over population. So, even a small percentage having tech jobs won't solve the issue. Jeremy Falcon
One of the reasons India is like it is because it is one of the few (maybe only ?) countries to have taken the colonial governments and administrations and successfully transform it into something of their own then progressed in terms of education and industry quite quickly - India launch some of their own satellites I believe. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
-
One of the reasons India is like it is because it is one of the few (maybe only ?) countries to have taken the colonial governments and administrations and successfully transform it into something of their own then progressed in terms of education and industry quite quickly - India launch some of their own satellites I believe. Elaine :rose: The tigress is here :-D
I wasn't talking about their education and accomplishments; I was talking about their economy. Jeremy Falcon
-
That's a fair question. At first I would probably be mad, disappointed, etc. But in the long run I would adapt and find new work. If I couldn't find work as a programmer I'd do one of the following: :bob: Find temporary work, perhaps in another field or doing something crazy, like devlivering newspapers.. assuming it pays better than unemployment benefits... while continuing to find a better job. :bob: Go back to school... one can spend a lot of time in school, racking up loans, but maintaining a good standard of living. :bob: Learn a new trade. Hopefully I'd be smart enough to see the writing on the wall *before* I lost my job. :bob: Marry somebody rich. :) An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Navin wrote: Learn a new trade. Hopefully I'd be smart enough to see the writing on the wall *before* I lost my job. I never can understand this one. When I got started in computer technology it was not even with a thought of making money, but because I loved computers. I personally do not learn a "trade" because there is a pot of gold at the end, if so I would be a lawyer since they will be the only ones left with money. Why drag yourself to work doing something that you do not love just for money? Isn't it easier to do things you love and live on walefare (assistnace)? ;) Rocky <>< www.HintsAndTips.com - Now with "Recommendation" postings www.MyQuickPoll.com - Now with Recent Poll List www.GotTheAnswerToSpam.com - Again :)
-
Navin wrote: So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? Hmmm. Because I'm also one of those whacko people that believes that corporate profits are not the only responsibility of a company. I personally think that businesses have a moral responsibility. And to me, this means looking out for your immediate neighbor first. But I realize this kind of thinking has gone the way of the Dodo bird, if it even ever existed. Look at the American industrial revolution. It was built and the economic wheels turned as a result of "outsourcing" work to children and women because they were cheaper and more complacent than men. Morality, concern for one's fellow human being, had absolutely no place in the cotton mills. It's pretty sad to see history repeat itself with outsourcing (and I don't mean just outsourcing programming jobs). The foundations of outsourcing are driven by greed. The workforce in that industry is also driven by greed--I freely admit that I try to get the highest dollar possible on my contracts so that I can have the best quality of life possible. The problem with my thinking is that it's all me, me, me, without regard for my neighbor, while at the same time I expect corporations to behave morally and to express concern for my neighbor which I, myself, do not. Uh. To get back to the question, outsourcing is bad because it doesn't address the problem of greed and the disparity between those who have and those who don't have. In fact it creates this disparity in two ways, by taking jobs away from people locally, and by giving those jobs to other people which promotes more disparity locally. Certainly places like India and Russia ask the top dollar possible themselves. The only way, and it's quite painful obviously, to break this cycle is for people to simply not be so damn greedy. So the issue of morality falls yet again on my shoulders, not on the corporation to which I would rather pass the morality buck. Well, that's my twisted view of the world. Quack, quack, or whatever sound Dodo's used to make. :-D Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing
Oh no.. I Have to vote you a 5 for that one! :) Rocky <>< www.HintsAndTips.com - Now with "Recommendation" postings www.MyQuickPoll.com - Now with Recent Poll List www.GotTheAnswerToSpam.com - Again :)
-
Bad thing / good thing it's all relative. As others have already pointed out, it's bad for you if it takes your job away, good for you if it gives you a job. Stating that it is fundamentally one or the other is useless - except for those trying to stir up bad feelings towards [concepts | non-protectionist politicians | protectionist politicians | Indians | etc.].
You**'re one microscopic cog** in his catastrophic plan...Actually, no, it is a bad thing for both. While it is a job of the underbidder, it will only last as long as there are no others that will bid lower. The person receiving the job will be making a relationship with a company that puts no loyalty on them as they did with the person who lost the job. It is just a matter of time. Marc was very correct in his posting that this is nothing more than a "Greed" driven beast that needs to be eleminated and not allowed to keep moving from country to country causing inflation in jobs to only kill those jobs off when the next low bidder comes along. Rocky <>< www.HintsAndTips.com - Now with "Recommendation" postings www.MyQuickPoll.com - Now with Recent Poll List www.GotTheAnswerToSpam.com - Again :)
-
Overpopulation is a completely different issue... it is mostly due to the fact that people are living longer than they ever have... An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
Navin wrote: Overpopulation is a completely different issue... it is mostly due to the fact that people are living longer than they ever have... :confused: Overpopulation can lead to widespread unemployment, which leads to low wages. Low wages draws companies. The movement of jobs to other countries is therefore intrisically caught up in overpopulation problems. ----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
-
I wasn't talking about their education and accomplishments; I was talking about their economy. Jeremy Falcon
Many people from India on this site have commented that their system of doing things is based on the British system. The British system is set up to make running a good economy easy (in other words there are checks and balances to make sure the system shows quickly when things are getting out of hand). Of course if they end up with some half-crazed nut like Mugabe at the helm then that isn't going to matter one jot. (Zimbabwe was ex-British colonial too). I noticed on Michael Palin's recent travel documentry when he passes from Pakistan to India there is a big sign as you enter India that says "Welcome to the world's most populous democracy" (or words to that effect)
Vogon Building and Loan advise that your planet is at risk if you do not keep up repayments on any mortgage secured upon it. Please remember that the force of gravity can go up as well as down.
-
Okay, this might be more soapbox material - but no more so than the original outsourcing thread. It seems the world is moving toward a more global economy... which means countries like India will see their quiality of life improving as more jobs move into their country. I read a statistic once (can't remember where) that said that the poorest 5% in the US is richer than the richest 95% of the rest of the world. The US economy and people have always been resillient - we will find new ways of making money even if old jobs disappear. So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
When was the last time we were attacked by Hindu terrorists? Never. That is because India spends its efforts growing its economy. As other economies grow the labor pool becomes more competitive. At the same time, we are often told that Islamic terrorism is largely due to economic hopelessness in the MiddleEast. We can't have it both ways. As economies grow their labor will be more competitive. Competitive workers may not make us happy, but it is something we will have to support if we want to build the world's economy so that economic disparity is minimized and hence (theoritically) terrorism.
-
Navin wrote: So, from a global perspective, why is outsourcing a bad thing? Hmmm. Because I'm also one of those whacko people that believes that corporate profits are not the only responsibility of a company. I personally think that businesses have a moral responsibility. And to me, this means looking out for your immediate neighbor first. But I realize this kind of thinking has gone the way of the Dodo bird, if it even ever existed. Look at the American industrial revolution. It was built and the economic wheels turned as a result of "outsourcing" work to children and women because they were cheaper and more complacent than men. Morality, concern for one's fellow human being, had absolutely no place in the cotton mills. It's pretty sad to see history repeat itself with outsourcing (and I don't mean just outsourcing programming jobs). The foundations of outsourcing are driven by greed. The workforce in that industry is also driven by greed--I freely admit that I try to get the highest dollar possible on my contracts so that I can have the best quality of life possible. The problem with my thinking is that it's all me, me, me, without regard for my neighbor, while at the same time I expect corporations to behave morally and to express concern for my neighbor which I, myself, do not. Uh. To get back to the question, outsourcing is bad because it doesn't address the problem of greed and the disparity between those who have and those who don't have. In fact it creates this disparity in two ways, by taking jobs away from people locally, and by giving those jobs to other people which promotes more disparity locally. Certainly places like India and Russia ask the top dollar possible themselves. The only way, and it's quite painful obviously, to break this cycle is for people to simply not be so damn greedy. So the issue of morality falls yet again on my shoulders, not on the corporation to which I would rather pass the morality buck. Well, that's my twisted view of the world. Quack, quack, or whatever sound Dodo's used to make. :-D Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing
...and I had to vote you a 1. Warm and Fuzzy thinking like that does not get us anywhere. Marc Clifton wrote: outsourcing is bad because it doesn't address the problem of greed and the disparity between those who have and those who don't have. OK, so how do you address that disparity? If giving work to foreign workers is not enough, what is? It is ludicrous to speak of greed in the context of business. Corporations are not charitable organizations, they exist to make money. That formula has been the most liberating mechanism in human history. It has been the basis for modern economic achievments. I simple do not understand what those of you who present these kinds of arguments want. How much has to be 'given' to the 'needy' in order to no longer be considered greedy?
-
LOL! I'm learning the ins-and-outs of real estate investing. Right now, I'm studying every there is to know about mortgages, leases, creative financing, etc. To make money at this, I'm going to have to know a lot of info and tricks of the trade, and that's what I plan to do. As long as we have people to want to live, we'll always have a need for real estate. And, it always appreciates in value. [edit] Ok, some times it doesn't, but you have to know your market. [/edit] On top of that, there's insurance to cover you butt in case the property is mutilated. So, all-in-all, it's a pretty safe way to make moola. After I gain enough experience, I may even write software tailored for real estate investors as well (AFAIK, they don't have anything like that yet). Jeremy Falcon
Excelent! I've been all but screaming this from the top of mole hills (we have no respectible elevation here in DFW). My wife and I began real estate investing a few years ago and are close to generating enough passive income for her to stop working (she's the real money maker in the family much more the me) Stick with it and stay calm. I've actualy began developing my own property management and evaluation software. Kind of fun. Hey don't worry, I can handle it. I took something. I can see things no one else can see. Why are you dressed like that? - Jack Burton
-
That's a fair question. At first I would probably be mad, disappointed, etc. But in the long run I would adapt and find new work. If I couldn't find work as a programmer I'd do one of the following: :bob: Find temporary work, perhaps in another field or doing something crazy, like devlivering newspapers.. assuming it pays better than unemployment benefits... while continuing to find a better job. :bob: Go back to school... one can spend a lot of time in school, racking up loans, but maintaining a good standard of living. :bob: Learn a new trade. Hopefully I'd be smart enough to see the writing on the wall *before* I lost my job. :bob: Marry somebody rich. :) An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.
I like your 4th solution, the easy way out. :-D Weiye Chen Life is hard, yet we are made of flesh...
-
When was the last time we were attacked by Hindu terrorists? Never. That is because India spends its efforts growing its economy. As other economies grow the labor pool becomes more competitive. At the same time, we are often told that Islamic terrorism is largely due to economic hopelessness in the MiddleEast. We can't have it both ways. As economies grow their labor will be more competitive. Competitive workers may not make us happy, but it is something we will have to support if we want to build the world's economy so that economic disparity is minimized and hence (theoritically) terrorism.
Stan Shannon wrote: India spends its efforts growing its economy. As other economies grow the labor pool becomes more competitive. At the same time, we are often told that Islamic terrorism is largely due to economic hopelessness in the MiddleEast. We can't have it both ways. As economies grow their labor will be more competitive. Competitive workers may not make us happy, but it is something we will have to support if we want to build the world's economy so that economic disparity is minimized and hence (theoritically) terrorism. Makes sense. :omg: I think I might actually be agreeing with you.
Vogon Building and Loan advise that your planet is at risk if you do not keep up repayments on any mortgage secured upon it. Please remember that the force of gravity can go up as well as down.