Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Parasoft's C++Test ?

Parasoft's C++Test ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++question
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    John Fisher
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi guys, I just started trying out Parasoft's C++Test and it looks interesting, but I don't have the time to test it as thoroughly as I'd like within the 3-day test license I've got. So, who has already tried it and would like to tell me what they thought? John

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J John Fisher

      Hi guys, I just started trying out Parasoft's C++Test and it looks interesting, but I don't have the time to test it as thoroughly as I'd like within the 3-day test license I've got. So, who has already tried it and would like to tell me what they thought? John

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Tim Smith
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I wasn't impressed. To really do good quality tests, you end up having to write your own test routines. C++Test works fine if you a testing routines that don't require any context or don't have complex arguments. However, I don't think many people really program like that. My software does a little more than strcpy. The other big problem I had with C++Test was that GOD AWFUL JAVA interface. It was SLOW as HELL. It doesn't work like Windows at all so you end up having to learn how to use the GUI and then learn how to use the program. IMHO, bite the bullet and resign yourself to the idea that you are going to have to write your own regression tests. Then spend the money you save on C++Test and buy Ration Suite (or at least Rational Purify and Rational PureCoverage.) I run PureCoverage and Purify on my test suites to make sure I have good solid converage on my test suites. I run Purify on the actual software to make sure I don't have leaks or questionable Windows code. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Tim Smith

        I wasn't impressed. To really do good quality tests, you end up having to write your own test routines. C++Test works fine if you a testing routines that don't require any context or don't have complex arguments. However, I don't think many people really program like that. My software does a little more than strcpy. The other big problem I had with C++Test was that GOD AWFUL JAVA interface. It was SLOW as HELL. It doesn't work like Windows at all so you end up having to learn how to use the GUI and then learn how to use the program. IMHO, bite the bullet and resign yourself to the idea that you are going to have to write your own regression tests. Then spend the money you save on C++Test and buy Ration Suite (or at least Rational Purify and Rational PureCoverage.) I run PureCoverage and Purify on my test suites to make sure I have good solid converage on my test suites. I run Purify on the actual software to make sure I don't have leaks or questionable Windows code. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        John Fisher
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks for the comments. Oh, I also noticed rather quickly that it doesn't exactly know what to do with the _com_ptr interfaces -- rendering the entire system unuseable on a project that uses them. Not good. (But maybe I'm missing something I don't have the time to find.) John

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups