Non-censorship
-
David Wulff wrote: I guess you can't censor the news. I bet they wouldn't say it on the 9pm news though. I can't see Fiona Bruce saying it anyway, but I bet Anna Ford would :-) Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
Michael P Butler wrote: but I bet Anna Ford would Yeh, the dirty cow. Didn't she marry an astronaut BTW? Michael P Butler wrote: I can't see Fiona Bruce saying it anyway Me neither, in the same way as I can't imagine the Queen taking a shit. :omg: :omg:
-
Michael P Butler wrote: but I bet Anna Ford would Yeh, the dirty cow. Didn't she marry an astronaut BTW? Michael P Butler wrote: I can't see Fiona Bruce saying it anyway Me neither, in the same way as I can't imagine the Queen taking a shit. :omg: :omg:
Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: Didn't she marry an astronaut BTW? I don't know if she ever married the guy, but this[^] article says she was engaged to former American astronaut, Colonel David Scott[^] Robert Edward Caldecott wrote: Me neither, in the same way as I can't imagine the Queen taking a sh*t. That explains why the royal family is so full of shit ;-) - Sorry; All this Charlie and Horseface coverage is winding me up today. X| Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
I've seen twats written uncensored on the BBC before at the beginning of a Fawlty Towers episode, but I never thought I'd see the day when they published a news article containing the word fuck uncensored in print. Let alone the phrase "Now fuck off and cover something important you twats!" : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4247237.stm[^] I guess you can't censor the news. :rolleyes:
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flikrEverybody is entitled to my opinion
Reading bbc.co.uk the day before the Superbowl I read an article about last year's "wardrobe malfunction" was displayed in full without any blurring. I found that suprising but its good that there's one website out there that's not censored. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
-
Reading bbc.co.uk the day before the Superbowl I read an article about last year's "wardrobe malfunction" was displayed in full without any blurring. I found that suprising but its good that there's one website out there that's not censored. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
That's not surprising - it was hardly hard core pornography now was it. Well, not to most people anyway, only the vocal ones with the biggest sticks to shake. :(
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flikrEverybody is entitled to my opinion
-
That's not surprising - it was hardly hard core pornography now was it. Well, not to most people anyway, only the vocal ones with the biggest sticks to shake. :(
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flikrEverybody is entitled to my opinion
From the ruckus it created you would imagine that they both had sex on stage or something :) I think most people simply did not give a damn about the whole incident but the ones that were offended would not shut up and that's why we're still talking about it one year on. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
-
From the ruckus it created you would imagine that they both had sex on stage or something :) I think most people simply did not give a damn about the whole incident but the ones that were offended would not shut up and that's why we're still talking about it one year on. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
Ramanan Sivan wrote: From the ruckus it created you would imagine that they both had sex on stage or something Yeah, no sh*t. Her nipple was covered and the scene didn't last a second. Frankly, I thought it was an awesome finale to the show. Regards, Alvaro
-
Reading bbc.co.uk the day before the Superbowl I read an article about last year's "wardrobe malfunction" was displayed in full without any blurring. I found that suprising but its good that there's one website out there that's not censored. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
Ramanan Sivan wrote: Reading bbc.co.uk the day before the Superbowl I read an article about last year's "wardrobe malfunction" was displayed in full without any blurring. I found that suprising but its good that there's one website out there that's not censored. That was a nothing incident really. Showing naked bodies on TV isn't a problem for most of us Brits. We don't get scared by nipples anymore. Of course some of our TV channels have gone a little too far, but they are on satellite and not proper programmes anyway. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Ramanan Sivan wrote: Reading bbc.co.uk the day before the Superbowl I read an article about last year's "wardrobe malfunction" was displayed in full without any blurring. I found that suprising but its good that there's one website out there that's not censored. That was a nothing incident really. Showing naked bodies on TV isn't a problem for most of us Brits. We don't get scared by nipples anymore. Of course some of our TV channels have gone a little too far, but they are on satellite and not proper programmes anyway. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
I thought it was a non-issue too. Hell I watched that program and I didn't even notice the damn thing. Who pays that much attention such a lame-ass song in the halftime show ? "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
-
That's not surprising - it was hardly hard core pornography now was it. Well, not to most people anyway, only the vocal ones with the biggest sticks to shake. :(
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flikrEverybody is entitled to my opinion
David Wulff wrote: the vocal ones with the biggest sticks to shake In their dreams :rolleyes:
Fold With Us! What a sad world it would be if everyone said and did only what was easy - Shog9
-
I thought it was a non-issue too. Hell I watched that program and I didn't even notice the damn thing. Who pays that much attention such a lame-ass song in the halftime show ? "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
The same folks that play rock music backwards to hear what Satan has to tell them...:rolleyes: Anger is the most impotent of passions. It effects nothing it goes about, and hurts the one who is possessed by it more than the one against whom it is directed. Carl Sandburg
-
The same folks that play rock music backwards to hear what Satan has to tell them...:rolleyes: Anger is the most impotent of passions. It effects nothing it goes about, and hurts the one who is possessed by it more than the one against whom it is directed. Carl Sandburg
"Satan commands you to play the record forward" :) -- My name in Katakana is ヨルゲン. My name in German is Jörgen. I blog too now[^]
-
I've seen twats written uncensored on the BBC before at the beginning of a Fawlty Towers episode, but I never thought I'd see the day when they published a news article containing the word fuck uncensored in print. Let alone the phrase "Now fuck off and cover something important you twats!" : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4247237.stm[^] I guess you can't censor the news. :rolleyes:
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flikrEverybody is entitled to my opinion
Idiots have a way of being found out eventually. :laugh: I thought the funny thing was how lacking in writing skills he obviously is. I mean, if you're going to screw up in public, at least do so competantly! :rolleyes: Anna :rose: Riverblade Ltd - Software Consultancy Services Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.
-
From the ruckus it created you would imagine that they both had sex on stage or something :) I think most people simply did not give a damn about the whole incident but the ones that were offended would not shut up and that's why we're still talking about it one year on. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. What I find ironic is these TV stations allow skimpier and skimpier clothing daily and yet when a skimpy garment flops it's all of the sudden horrible. Or seeing 95% of a boob or a chick in lingerie is ok, but the nipple is just wrong. Well, if they would've made her ass put some real clothes on to begin with they could've prevented the thing all together. If people want to look at naked people, then at least keep it on the channels that can be easily blocked. That way everyone is happy and not just one side of the fence. And then, parents can let their kids look at all the tits they want. [edit] And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now. [/edit] Jeremy Falcon
-
David Wulff wrote: the vocal ones with the biggest sticks to shake In their dreams :rolleyes:
Fold With Us! What a sad world it would be if everyone said and did only what was easy - Shog9
K(arl) wrote: In their dreams You're right, we have the biggest dicks -- not sticks. ;P Jeremy Falcon
-
I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. What I find ironic is these TV stations allow skimpier and skimpier clothing daily and yet when a skimpy garment flops it's all of the sudden horrible. Or seeing 95% of a boob or a chick in lingerie is ok, but the nipple is just wrong. Well, if they would've made her ass put some real clothes on to begin with they could've prevented the thing all together. If people want to look at naked people, then at least keep it on the channels that can be easily blocked. That way everyone is happy and not just one side of the fence. And then, parents can let their kids look at all the tits they want. [edit] And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now. [/edit] Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote: And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now I'm impressed, Jeremy, I really am :) And I don't think its right that there should be nudity on prime time tv either. But I just think too much was made of it...as you say there is skimpy clothing and questionable material on many tv shows (especially some of the stupider reality ones) and people ignore that and one thing like this happens and everyone who's someone tries to get in the news by loudly condemning it. I thought that laughable. Simply fine that woman (who was obviously responsible) and move on. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote: And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now I'm impressed, Jeremy, I really am :) And I don't think its right that there should be nudity on prime time tv either. But I just think too much was made of it...as you say there is skimpy clothing and questionable material on many tv shows (especially some of the stupider reality ones) and people ignore that and one thing like this happens and everyone who's someone tries to get in the news by loudly condemning it. I thought that laughable. Simply fine that woman (who was obviously responsible) and move on. "One of the Georges," said Psmith, "I forget which, once said that a certain number of hours' sleep a day--I cannot recall for the moment how many--made a man something, which for the time being has slipped my memory."
Ramanan Sivan wrote: I'm impressed, Jeremy, I really am Maybe one day I'll even be rational, but that's pushing it. :) Ramanan Sivan wrote: But I just think too much was made of it Agreed. Ramanan Sivan wrote: Simply fine that woman (who was obviously responsible) and move on. Well, I do think if the network didn't allow the skimpy clothing in the first place, it wouldn't have happened. I figure they should both be fined. Jeremy Falcon
-
I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. What I find ironic is these TV stations allow skimpier and skimpier clothing daily and yet when a skimpy garment flops it's all of the sudden horrible. Or seeing 95% of a boob or a chick in lingerie is ok, but the nipple is just wrong. Well, if they would've made her ass put some real clothes on to begin with they could've prevented the thing all together. If people want to look at naked people, then at least keep it on the channels that can be easily blocked. That way everyone is happy and not just one side of the fence. And then, parents can let their kids look at all the tits they want. [edit] And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now. [/edit] Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. Apparently it was the most requested replay item on TiVo by a huge margin. i.e. People voted with their remotes; they liked it, wanted it and replayed it to death. "Oh how scandalous that was Mary Jane, we can't have that filth T.V. Now let's see it again..." But yeah, better that shows that may contain objectional content come with a warning. regards, Paul Watson South Africa The Code Project Pope Pius II said "The only prescription is more cowbell. "
-
K(arl) wrote: In their dreams You're right, we have the biggest dicks -- not sticks. ;P Jeremy Falcon
Yes, in your dreams ;-P
Fold With Us! What a sad world it would be if everyone said and did only what was easy - Shog9
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. Apparently it was the most requested replay item on TiVo by a huge margin. i.e. People voted with their remotes; they liked it, wanted it and replayed it to death. "Oh how scandalous that was Mary Jane, we can't have that filth T.V. Now let's see it again..." But yeah, better that shows that may contain objectional content come with a warning. regards, Paul Watson South Africa The Code Project Pope Pius II said "The only prescription is more cowbell. "
That really wasn't that nice a teat, anyway. Why don't those people buy a magazine or something, and leave their "scandal" comments unsaid?:doh: "If it's Snowbird season, why can't we shoot them?" - Overheard in a bar in Bullhead City
-
I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. What I find ironic is these TV stations allow skimpier and skimpier clothing daily and yet when a skimpy garment flops it's all of the sudden horrible. Or seeing 95% of a boob or a chick in lingerie is ok, but the nipple is just wrong. Well, if they would've made her ass put some real clothes on to begin with they could've prevented the thing all together. If people want to look at naked people, then at least keep it on the channels that can be easily blocked. That way everyone is happy and not just one side of the fence. And then, parents can let their kids look at all the tits they want. [edit] And yeah, it is scary that I'm starting to think like a parent now. [/edit] Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I wouldn't want my kids seeing that, and I'm willing to bet there are a lot more people like me. Seeing what? An exposed breast? Will you allow your kids to be breast fed? What if you have two kids, would you let the older one look on while the other one is breast-fed? Just what is so horrible with seeing a partially exposed breast (her nipple was covered) for one second? Everyone and their mothers has seen breasts. Regards, Alvaro
