Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Re-engineering and Profitability

Re-engineering and Profitability

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
cssdatabasesql-servercomsysadmin
8 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    devvvy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    From SQL Server Central.com: You see, the time I spend worrying about what tax expenses I can track is less time I have to spend worrying about generating more income. And that's where I see many corporations falling down these days. They worry more about expenses than revenue. Trimming expenses is all right, but the only way to grow a business is increase the revenues. Anything else is a short term fix. This is so true. Re-engineering, layoffs, cost cutting, off-shoring and all those talk about compensation and organization being "result-oriented" (a concept invented by MBA's) is for un-profitable businesses with thin or no priofit margin and people working their arse off for a plumber's salary. Profitable businesses are characterized by CEO with private jets, employee with stock option plan, engineers with nice cars, a company with a "reward oriented" (a concept invented by someone who's Not an MBA :)) culture, and a product that sells. Norman Fung

    P G B J 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D devvvy

      From SQL Server Central.com: You see, the time I spend worrying about what tax expenses I can track is less time I have to spend worrying about generating more income. And that's where I see many corporations falling down these days. They worry more about expenses than revenue. Trimming expenses is all right, but the only way to grow a business is increase the revenues. Anything else is a short term fix. This is so true. Re-engineering, layoffs, cost cutting, off-shoring and all those talk about compensation and organization being "result-oriented" (a concept invented by MBA's) is for un-profitable businesses with thin or no priofit margin and people working their arse off for a plumber's salary. Profitable businesses are characterized by CEO with private jets, employee with stock option plan, engineers with nice cars, a company with a "reward oriented" (a concept invented by someone who's Not an MBA :)) culture, and a product that sells. Norman Fung

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Watson
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Sometimes you really do have to layoff to save the business. e.g. An export business in a country whose currency suddenly strengthens dramatically. My dad's business lost 40% of its revenues in just three months because the Rand strengthened against his main market, the Dollar. You can't tell me the business was running on razor thin profit margins to start with, 40% is a big margin to loose. And you can't turn an export company into an import company in a matter of months, they are very different businesses. But you do have a general point. Just don't say it is only for un-profitable or badly run businesses. Shit does happen. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Wheeler wrote: It's people like you that keep me heading for my big debut on CNN...

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Sometimes you really do have to layoff to save the business. e.g. An export business in a country whose currency suddenly strengthens dramatically. My dad's business lost 40% of its revenues in just three months because the Rand strengthened against his main market, the Dollar. You can't tell me the business was running on razor thin profit margins to start with, 40% is a big margin to loose. And you can't turn an export company into an import company in a matter of months, they are very different businesses. But you do have a general point. Just don't say it is only for un-profitable or badly run businesses. Shit does happen. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Wheeler wrote: It's people like you that keep me heading for my big debut on CNN...

        D Offline
        D Offline
        devvvy
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Paul Watson wrote: My dad's business lost 40% of its revenues in just three months Sorry to hear that. Paul Watson wrote: you can't turn an export company into an import company in a matter of months... sh*t does happen. well said :) Paul Watson wrote: But you do have a general point The point is, we have our mind on cost cutting for too long, too deep. Instead, we should try to steer away from unprofitable businesses. But, what's profitable these days with China and India driving down price on everything except natural resources. Norman Fung

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D devvvy

          From SQL Server Central.com: You see, the time I spend worrying about what tax expenses I can track is less time I have to spend worrying about generating more income. And that's where I see many corporations falling down these days. They worry more about expenses than revenue. Trimming expenses is all right, but the only way to grow a business is increase the revenues. Anything else is a short term fix. This is so true. Re-engineering, layoffs, cost cutting, off-shoring and all those talk about compensation and organization being "result-oriented" (a concept invented by MBA's) is for un-profitable businesses with thin or no priofit margin and people working their arse off for a plumber's salary. Profitable businesses are characterized by CEO with private jets, employee with stock option plan, engineers with nice cars, a company with a "reward oriented" (a concept invented by someone who's Not an MBA :)) culture, and a product that sells. Norman Fung

          G Offline
          G Offline
          GISnet
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The same principle can be applied to the people complaining about SUVs on the road and how if we all drove (whatever their underpowered and less comfortable alternative vehicle) then the world would be a better place. Meanwhile they refuse to allow us to drill offshore or in 1% of ANWAR or build more refineries. Hmmm, subject for the soapbox....


          Microsoft makes Digital Photos fun with Photo Story 3 and its free.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D devvvy

            From SQL Server Central.com: You see, the time I spend worrying about what tax expenses I can track is less time I have to spend worrying about generating more income. And that's where I see many corporations falling down these days. They worry more about expenses than revenue. Trimming expenses is all right, but the only way to grow a business is increase the revenues. Anything else is a short term fix. This is so true. Re-engineering, layoffs, cost cutting, off-shoring and all those talk about compensation and organization being "result-oriented" (a concept invented by MBA's) is for un-profitable businesses with thin or no priofit margin and people working their arse off for a plumber's salary. Profitable businesses are characterized by CEO with private jets, employee with stock option plan, engineers with nice cars, a company with a "reward oriented" (a concept invented by someone who's Not an MBA :)) culture, and a product that sells. Norman Fung

            B Offline
            B Offline
            brianwelsch
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I think it's part of where you are in the market's cycle. If you're smack in the middle of a boom, companies will spend more money to make money. During a recession, however, when it's tougher to get at other people money, it makes perfect sense to trim the fat. BW


            I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English?
            Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
            -- Stewie Griffin

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B brianwelsch

              I think it's part of where you are in the market's cycle. If you're smack in the middle of a boom, companies will spend more money to make money. During a recession, however, when it's tougher to get at other people money, it makes perfect sense to trim the fat. BW


              I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English?
              Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
              -- Stewie Griffin

              G Offline
              G Offline
              GISnet
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Great post.


              Microsoft makes Digital Photos fun with Photo Story 3 and its free.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G GISnet

                Great post.


                Microsoft makes Digital Photos fun with Photo Story 3 and its free.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                brianwelsch
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                thank you. :) BW


                I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English?
                Yo quiero pancakes. Donnez moi pancakes. Click click, bloody click pancakes!
                -- Stewie Griffin

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D devvvy

                  From SQL Server Central.com: You see, the time I spend worrying about what tax expenses I can track is less time I have to spend worrying about generating more income. And that's where I see many corporations falling down these days. They worry more about expenses than revenue. Trimming expenses is all right, but the only way to grow a business is increase the revenues. Anything else is a short term fix. This is so true. Re-engineering, layoffs, cost cutting, off-shoring and all those talk about compensation and organization being "result-oriented" (a concept invented by MBA's) is for un-profitable businesses with thin or no priofit margin and people working their arse off for a plumber's salary. Profitable businesses are characterized by CEO with private jets, employee with stock option plan, engineers with nice cars, a company with a "reward oriented" (a concept invented by someone who's Not an MBA :)) culture, and a product that sells. Norman Fung

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jon Sagara
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  norm wrote: people working their arse off for a plumber's salary Plumbers can make quite a bit of money. IIRC, the going rate is from $75 - $150 per hour.

                  Jon Sagara I said NO salt, NO salt on my margarita!!
                  My Articles

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups