don't read, for you may not feel so well afterwards
-
Gary Kirkham wrote: It is not about change, it is about punishment :doh: Why am I so naive? I thought it should be about protecting society... David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidyWow, you are naive! I guess that instead of "let the punishment fit the crime", it should be "let the level of protection for the society fit the crime." edit: If you carry that logic farther, then you might say that the maximum level of protection for the society could be achieved by permanently eliminating all convicted criminals. Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read
-
NOBODY have right to end life of somebody else (if it's not someone's will, otherwise arguable). Period. Anonymous wrote: If we had executed this monster the first time he molested If we had locked him she would be alive as well. Anonymous wrote: Do you accept responsibility for the loss of her innocent life? :confused: If I were her parent, if I were there and did nothing to help, if I were jury and made wrong decision, if I were murderer, then I'd accept responsibility of her life. No I don't. Or how was it meant? David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote: Or how was it meant? This child was just as much a victim of failures of the state as any innocent person executed by the state. An innocent person is dead because of the state. We are all just as repsonsible for her death as we would be for any innocent sent to the electric chair. I have no strong opinions regarding the death penalty one way or the other, but I do have problems with those who seem to care far more for the innocents killed by the state in an attempt to protect society from them, than they do for those innocenets killed by the state by not trying hard enough to protect society in the name of some misquided notion of justice. I have no problem with locking these people up permanently, but I also have no problem with simply killing them when convicted. I am willing to take my chances of being wrongfully executed if it helps to save a childs life. Are you? Stan Shannon
-
dnh wrote: Or how was it meant? This child was just as much a victim of failures of the state as any innocent person executed by the state. An innocent person is dead because of the state. We are all just as repsonsible for her death as we would be for any innocent sent to the electric chair. I have no strong opinions regarding the death penalty one way or the other, but I do have problems with those who seem to care far more for the innocents killed by the state in an attempt to protect society from them, than they do for those innocenets killed by the state by not trying hard enough to protect society in the name of some misquided notion of justice. I have no problem with locking these people up permanently, but I also have no problem with simply killing them when convicted. I am willing to take my chances of being wrongfully executed if it helps to save a childs life. Are you? Stan Shannon
Anonymous wrote: I have no strong opinions regarding the death penalty one way or the other, but I do have problems with those who seem to care far more for the innocents killed by the state in an attempt to protect society from them, than they do for those innocenets killed by the state by not trying hard enough to protect society in the name of some misquided notion of justice. hmmm. You know the problem is that you can vote against death penalty. You can't vote against killing in the street. I can see your point but what you said I belive has noting to do with how I care for innocents killed on the street. Anonymous wrote: I have no problem with locking these people up permanently, but I also have no problem with simply killing them when convicted. I do. Anonymous wrote: it helps to save a childs life. Are you? Again, I don't see why we (or better you, we in civilized world don't have death penalty) have to kill them? As you too said we can just lock them. Ok maybe give them chance to decide wheater they want to be executed or kept in prison for the rest of their lives? David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
Wow, you are naive! I guess that instead of "let the punishment fit the crime", it should be "let the level of protection for the society fit the crime." edit: If you carry that logic farther, then you might say that the maximum level of protection for the society could be achieved by permanently eliminating all convicted criminals. Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read
[OT] Gary Kirkham wrote: Wow, you are naive! yeah... you know I really belived Phila can beat Detriot. Damned. :((:(( [/OT] Gary Kirkham wrote: If you carry that logic farther There is a suitable term for it... ad absurdum. My opinion depends on what you mean by "permanently eliminating". David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
Anonymous wrote: I have no strong opinions regarding the death penalty one way or the other, but I do have problems with those who seem to care far more for the innocents killed by the state in an attempt to protect society from them, than they do for those innocenets killed by the state by not trying hard enough to protect society in the name of some misquided notion of justice. hmmm. You know the problem is that you can vote against death penalty. You can't vote against killing in the street. I can see your point but what you said I belive has noting to do with how I care for innocents killed on the street. Anonymous wrote: I have no problem with locking these people up permanently, but I also have no problem with simply killing them when convicted. I do. Anonymous wrote: it helps to save a childs life. Are you? Again, I don't see why we (or better you, we in civilized world don't have death penalty) have to kill them? As you too said we can just lock them. Ok maybe give them chance to decide wheater they want to be executed or kept in prison for the rest of their lives? David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote:. You know the problem is that you can vote against death penalty. You can't vote against killing in the street. But you can vote for much harser penalties for certain types of crimes with the same fervor that you would to get rid of the death penalty. You can vote to muzzle groups like the ACLU. This man had already been convicted of molestation, he was in the hands of the state and they let him go. If he had been executed (or permanently locked up if possible) at that time, that little girl would still be alive. There is absolutely no difference between the loss of her innocent life and the lose of an innocent life in the electric chair - none at all, the legal system erred and we sacrificed an innocent life. Her blood is own our hands just as certainly as if we had executed her. dnh wrote: As you too said we can just lock them. The problem is that there will be a hue and cry from groups such as the ACLU that locking sex offenders up forever is "cruel and unusual" and they will end up getting released to molest and kill again. When they do kill, those who oppose the death penalty becuase it is imperfect, will be no where to be found to take repsonsibility for those murdered. Stan Shannon
-
dnh wrote:. You know the problem is that you can vote against death penalty. You can't vote against killing in the street. But you can vote for much harser penalties for certain types of crimes with the same fervor that you would to get rid of the death penalty. You can vote to muzzle groups like the ACLU. This man had already been convicted of molestation, he was in the hands of the state and they let him go. If he had been executed (or permanently locked up if possible) at that time, that little girl would still be alive. There is absolutely no difference between the loss of her innocent life and the lose of an innocent life in the electric chair - none at all, the legal system erred and we sacrificed an innocent life. Her blood is own our hands just as certainly as if we had executed her. dnh wrote: As you too said we can just lock them. The problem is that there will be a hue and cry from groups such as the ACLU that locking sex offenders up forever is "cruel and unusual" and they will end up getting released to molest and kill again. When they do kill, those who oppose the death penalty becuase it is imperfect, will be no where to be found to take repsonsibility for those murdered. Stan Shannon
Basicaly we both want the same thing ("surprisingly", no one want monsters like that to walk free), which can be achived by death penalty or life-long jail. I say we don't have right to kill. That's the first time I hear about ACLU. Anonymous wrote: that locking sex offenders up forever is "cruel and unusual" and they will end up getting released to molest and kill again. So, kill them with lethal injection or someting is not "cruel or unusual"? oh please... Again, I'd like to see survey how many prisoners would prefer death sentence against life-long jail... (It would be morbid survey, I know). Maybe I am comletely wrong? I don't know, we don't have death penalty here... and IMHO level of violence is not worse then in USA, but that's just my opinion not based on facts. Anonymous wrote: When they do kill, those who oppose the death penalty becuase it is imperfect Again and again, I don't say release them... but I say don't kill them. yes I am awared it brings some problems too... David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
Basicaly we both want the same thing ("surprisingly", no one want monsters like that to walk free), which can be achived by death penalty or life-long jail. I say we don't have right to kill. That's the first time I hear about ACLU. Anonymous wrote: that locking sex offenders up forever is "cruel and unusual" and they will end up getting released to molest and kill again. So, kill them with lethal injection or someting is not "cruel or unusual"? oh please... Again, I'd like to see survey how many prisoners would prefer death sentence against life-long jail... (It would be morbid survey, I know). Maybe I am comletely wrong? I don't know, we don't have death penalty here... and IMHO level of violence is not worse then in USA, but that's just my opinion not based on facts. Anonymous wrote: When they do kill, those who oppose the death penalty becuase it is imperfect Again and again, I don't say release them... but I say don't kill them. yes I am awared it brings some problems too... David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote: That's the first time I hear about ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union - basically an organization of socialist lawyers dedicated to subverting the legal system to achieve a more leftist social order - all in the guise of defending the constitution (which they could care less about) dnh wrote: So, kill them with lethal injection or someting is not "cruel or unusual"? oh please... Again, I'd like to see survey how many prisoners would prefer death sentence against life-long jail... (It would be morbid survey, I know). Maybe I am comletely wrong? I don't know, we don't have death penalty here... and IMHO level of violence is not worse then in USA, but that's just my opinion not based on facts. A lifetime in prison would be more cruel than a quick death with a needle. I know which I would prefer. But lawyers in organizations such as the ACLU can mkae the most modest forms of punhishment seem like a soviet gulag and have a lot of money and power backing them up to fight their cause. Any prisoner given a life sentence always has a very real hope of being released at some point. dnh wrote: Again and again, I don't say release them Yet they always seem to get released. If those who fight against the death penalty would fight just as hard to prevent very dangerous people from going free, I would agree with you completely. Until then, I will continue to entertain the necessity of the death penalty in a society as inherently violent as ours is in the US.
-
I don’t watch a whole lot of television, although when I get home in the evenings around 7PM or so I try to catch some news just to see what’s going on in the world. Well, last night I wish I had not done so. It seems that additional details have arisen regarding the brutal rape and murder of the 9 year old Jessica Lunsford (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7578059/[^]). When you hear the words rape and murder in the same sentence one can reasonably assume that things cannot get any worse for the person involved. However, for this innocent child things were definitely worst: she was buried alive. Bad things happen in the world every day and at every minute: terrorism, war, natural disasters, starvation, rape, murder, and the list goes on and on with just about every bad thing you can think of. By now I would think everyone has adapted to the horrors of the times, such that when we hear bad news its impact on us is minor, perhaps non existent. However, this particular case has taken its toll on me. I’m a father, one three year old girl and a baby of only seven months, both of which I love more than anything else, above and beyond my own life. I just cannot imagine the pain this girl’s parents are feeling at this very moment and will continue to feel for the rest of their lives, no doubt a wound that will never heal. My eyes are watery as I write this thread, an occasional tear hear and there. Sadness? No doubt. Rage? That too. Sometimes I bitch and moan about life, about money usually, always wanting more and more. Bills to pay, mouths to feed, backs to clothe, education to provide, and of course everyone wants those extra luxuries. Yet it's events like these that make me pause, think, and realize how good I really have it. I may not have that beamer I’ve always wanted or that mansion up in the hills, but I do have my two little girls, and that’s worth infinity. Yet, however, more often than not I’m foolish enough to take this fact for granted. Perhaps little Jessica’s parents took her for granted as well, that is, expected her to always be there with her arms wide open, as if it such were a right rather than a privilege. Don’t we all take our children for granted? I know I have. We see and care for them every single day, expecting the next day to be just like the prior one, on so on and so forth. Indeed my eyes have been opened by this case. Nothing in
I gotta tell you, since I had kids, I come close to crying whenever I hear anything like this, or even see movies with a plot that involves harm to children. That's just how it is, at least for me. I'm in Singapore for the MVP conference. Man, I miss them.
-
dnh wrote: That's the first time I hear about ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union - basically an organization of socialist lawyers dedicated to subverting the legal system to achieve a more leftist social order - all in the guise of defending the constitution (which they could care less about) dnh wrote: So, kill them with lethal injection or someting is not "cruel or unusual"? oh please... Again, I'd like to see survey how many prisoners would prefer death sentence against life-long jail... (It would be morbid survey, I know). Maybe I am comletely wrong? I don't know, we don't have death penalty here... and IMHO level of violence is not worse then in USA, but that's just my opinion not based on facts. A lifetime in prison would be more cruel than a quick death with a needle. I know which I would prefer. But lawyers in organizations such as the ACLU can mkae the most modest forms of punhishment seem like a soviet gulag and have a lot of money and power backing them up to fight their cause. Any prisoner given a life sentence always has a very real hope of being released at some point. dnh wrote: Again and again, I don't say release them Yet they always seem to get released. If those who fight against the death penalty would fight just as hard to prevent very dangerous people from going free, I would agree with you completely. Until then, I will continue to entertain the necessity of the death penalty in a society as inherently violent as ours is in the US.
Anonymous wrote: I know which I would prefer Me too, and I don't think we both mean the same option. Anonymous wrote: But lawyers in organizations such as the ACLU can mkae the most modest forms of punhishment seem like a soviet gulag and have a lot of money and power backing them up to fight their cause. lawyers... :mad: Anonymous wrote: If those who fight against the death penalty would fight just as hard to prevent very dangerous people from going free, I would agree with you completely. I am glad you would. Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
Anyone think for moment that if this monster is found guilty he should be spared the death penality? Jerry Most people are willing to pay more to be amused than to be educated--Robert C. Savage, Life Lessons Toasty0.com Ladder League (beta)
Yes, without question. The problem with the death penalty is not one of possibly taking an innocent life (we do that in wars 24/7 and no one gives a damn), it's about the "now it's not a problem anymore because they're dead" mentality. Many people are all too keen to just sweep their dirty rubbish under the mat and pretend it isn't there rather than actually thinking "what could we do to help prevent it". We kill our violent criminals so we are safe. The death penalty doesn't deter violent crime - countries with the death penalty share the highest violent crime rates in the world. It's about revenge and pretending the problem doesn't exist. What would you like to happen if in ten years time it emerged the person who killed the little girl in this thread might have killed more children? You would never know where they were, you would never be able to know for sure if they were alive or dead. Could you face the parents and tell them, "oh I'm sorry, we've already killed him - oops" ? The death penalty is the easy way out, not the best way out.
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flickrDie Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen
-
Yes, without question. The problem with the death penalty is not one of possibly taking an innocent life (we do that in wars 24/7 and no one gives a damn), it's about the "now it's not a problem anymore because they're dead" mentality. Many people are all too keen to just sweep their dirty rubbish under the mat and pretend it isn't there rather than actually thinking "what could we do to help prevent it". We kill our violent criminals so we are safe. The death penalty doesn't deter violent crime - countries with the death penalty share the highest violent crime rates in the world. It's about revenge and pretending the problem doesn't exist. What would you like to happen if in ten years time it emerged the person who killed the little girl in this thread might have killed more children? You would never know where they were, you would never be able to know for sure if they were alive or dead. Could you face the parents and tell them, "oh I'm sorry, we've already killed him - oops" ? The death penalty is the easy way out, not the best way out.
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flickrDie Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen
David Wulff wrote: The problem with the death penalty is not one of possibly taking an innocent life (we do that in wars 24/7 and no one gives a damn) That still doesn't make it right though - surely it's too high a risk if it would mean even one innocent life was lost as a result? As you say, it doesn't really solve the problem. -- Andrew.
-
David Wulff wrote: The problem with the death penalty is not one of possibly taking an innocent life (we do that in wars 24/7 and no one gives a damn) That still doesn't make it right though - surely it's too high a risk if it would mean even one innocent life was lost as a result? As you say, it doesn't really solve the problem. -- Andrew.
Andrew Peace wrote: surely it's too high a risk if it would mean even one innocent life was lost as a result? Of course it is... but only on paper. In reality no-one truely cares. A life is a statistic not a person. It will never happen to 'me' or 'anyone I care about' because 'we' don't commit violent crimes. I find it ironic that the same people who bitch about their governments reaching more and more into their personal lives and taking away personal responsibility are happy to sit back and advocate them pushing the death penalty if they are convicted of violent crimes. Given the steady stream of people having their convictions overturned every year because it turns out they were just 'in the wrong place at the wrong time' I wonder how quickly they would change their opinions should they ever find themselves facing paralysis and then suffocation at the hands of a state executioner. Waiting till it affects you personally before you try to change the system is backward; time is not on your side.
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flickrDie Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen
-
Andrew Peace wrote: surely it's too high a risk if it would mean even one innocent life was lost as a result? Of course it is... but only on paper. In reality no-one truely cares. A life is a statistic not a person. It will never happen to 'me' or 'anyone I care about' because 'we' don't commit violent crimes. I find it ironic that the same people who bitch about their governments reaching more and more into their personal lives and taking away personal responsibility are happy to sit back and advocate them pushing the death penalty if they are convicted of violent crimes. Given the steady stream of people having their convictions overturned every year because it turns out they were just 'in the wrong place at the wrong time' I wonder how quickly they would change their opinions should they ever find themselves facing paralysis and then suffocation at the hands of a state executioner. Waiting till it affects you personally before you try to change the system is backward; time is not on your side.
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flickrDie Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen
David Wulff wrote: Given the steady stream of people having their convictions overturned every year because it turns out they were just 'in the wrong place at the wrong time' Also, there seems to have been a number of cases where expert witnesses have had their testimony overturned. I read a interesting titbit of information that DNA tests are not 100% accurate. The failure rate is very low for someone without an identical twin/triplet/etc. but it is still possible. 1 in a million are close enough to someone else that the test can't distinguish them. That would mean that ~60 people in the UK have sufficiently close enough DNA to you or me that a test wouldn't work.
My: Blog | Photos | Next SQL Presentation WDevs.com - Open Source Code Hosting, Blogs, FTP, Mail and More
-
Nah, you are not understanding it again. Problem is that judges run in the real world not in world of ones and zeroes... As long as probability of bribing jury or mistakes or someting is bigger then 0% I am against death penalty that's it. While I may not be aginst executing murderers I am against even POSSIBILITY to execute innocent. So in your question is problem with Toasty0 wrote: Anyone think for moment that if this monster is found guilty he should be spared the death penality? If you ask Anyone think for moment that if this monster is guilty he should be spared the death penality? then answer is NO. David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote: Nah, you are not understanding it again you do understand that the motherfucker admited it, don't you? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
-
dnh wrote: Nah, you are not understanding it again you do understand that the motherfucker admited it, don't you? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
yes I do. Certainly he can't be set free. Nobody have right to kill. Not even the state. David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
yes I do. Certainly he can't be set free. Nobody have right to kill. Not even the state. David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote: Nobody have right to kill. then he should be let out and the father given a gun. if it were my daughter, I'd kill this garbage with my bare hands. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
-
I gotta tell you, since I had kids, I come close to crying whenever I hear anything like this, or even see movies with a plot that involves harm to children. That's just how it is, at least for me. I'm in Singapore for the MVP conference. Man, I miss them.
It's not just you, I feel the same and I don't have kids of my own. Not always with children, but when anyone loved is lost to another person it usually brings me to that state. I think it is being able to empathise with the loss that does it. In cruel cases it just makes it harder.
Ðavid Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum
Audioscrobbler :: flickrDie Freiheit spielt auf allen Geigen
-
dnh wrote: Nobody have right to kill. then he should be let out and the father given a gun. if it were my daughter, I'd kill this garbage with my bare hands. Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
would that bring her back?? resurrect from death??? David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy -
would that bring her back?? resurrect from death??? David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidydnh wrote: would that bring her back?? resurrect from death??? what is your point? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
-
dnh wrote: would that bring her back?? resurrect from death??? what is your point? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me K(arl) wrote: Date:8:50 23 Feb '05 I love you.
Mike Gaskey wrote: what is your point? by killing those who caused you great pain you are still NOT making world better place. David Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy