sleepless
-
I repeat: what part of that statement was chauvinistic, and what part mentioned women? I agree completely with your stance on equality, though find your attack on the British schooling system slightly baffling, however it bears no relavence to my post. :confused: ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
David Wulff wrote: (or a partner who's openminded)... That part, in the context you used it, inferred a female. You know it, and I know it. I don't think they teach you not to think of women as only sexual ojects because you probably don't have Health class in England like we have in the U.S. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
-
What David Wulff means is that whenever he is stressed out, he goes to his wife or girlfriend and uses their bodies for sexual release, thereby giving him a state of relaxation and comfort. He is also recommending that everyone else have the same types of relationships with women as he does, i.e., merely using the female form as a stress reliever or a human toilet. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Hey hey hey - before you go stating what I do or do not mean, get your damned facts straight, mate. :mad: I have never stated nor posessed the views you are dictating for me, and do not appreciate you doing so. Either appologise or remove your post. If you want to start a character degradation, then you've picked the right guy, but be prepared for a lack of sleep for many days. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
-
just the "box of tissue" was a bit confusing... my latin american english is not very good... specially when i´m tired... :) Mauricio Ritter - Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank Marshall, Will and Holly
On a routine expedition
Met the greatest earthquake ever known
High on the rapids It struck their tiny raft ahhhhh...
And plunged them down a thousand feet below
To the Land of the LostMauricio Ritter wrote: my latin american english is not very good Your English is a hell of a lot better than most American/English people's Brazillian... :) ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
-
David Wulff wrote: (or a partner who's openminded)... That part, in the context you used it, inferred a female. You know it, and I know it. I don't think they teach you not to think of women as only sexual ojects because you probably don't have Health class in England like we have in the U.S. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Martin Marvinski wrote: That part, in the context you used it, inferred a female. You know it, and I know it. If I wanted to infer a female, I would have said "woman". My statement is open ended, and you can insert whatever the hell you like in there, be it man, woman or goat. That was by design to stop people who are high on themselves and their social/peer standings from initiating attacks on my character. Obviously this did not work. And you can infer what you like from that. Martin Marvinski wrote: I don't think they teach you not to think of women as only sexual ojects because you probably don't have Health class in England like we have in the U.S. To look at it a different way; we don' need specific classes to teach us this, because it is at the core of everything we see and do from the age we learn how to walk and talk. We have life skills lessons, which teach us (surprisingly) skills we will need in life. Sexual equality is taught to us "specifically" in Primary school RE classes, though it need not be. (I believe you call them elementary schools). ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
-
I do warm milk with honey. You could also try meditation tapes. Cathy Life's uncertain, have dessert first!
Cathy wrote: I do warm milk with honey The mother of my ex-girlfriend gave me the same receipe, but I think it was some kind of witchcraft (she don´t like me) and never take it. I try that ! Tks ! :) Mauricio Ritter - Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank Marshall, Will and Holly
On a routine expedition
Met the greatest earthquake ever known
High on the rapids It struck their tiny raft ahhhhh...
And plunged them down a thousand feet below
To the Land of the Lost -
Hey hey hey - before you go stating what I do or do not mean, get your damned facts straight, mate. :mad: I have never stated nor posessed the views you are dictating for me, and do not appreciate you doing so. Either appologise or remove your post. If you want to start a character degradation, then you've picked the right guy, but be prepared for a lack of sleep for many days. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
Lets have others comment on it. I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased. I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. If they don't, then I appologise, but if everyone agrees that you meant it that way, I retract my appology. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
-
Lets have others comment on it. I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased. I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. If they don't, then I appologise, but if everyone agrees that you meant it that way, I retract my appology. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Martin Marvinski wrote: Lets have others comment on it. I have taken it to the masses. Martin Marvinski wrote: I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased Well I am telling you (and have done all of seven times now) that it was not. Even so, you have no right whatsoever to state that that was what I meant. By all means say you think that was what I meant (free speech and all), but do not make the mistake of assuming you are automatically right and quote it as fact. Martin Marvinski wrote: I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have Of course they will, but you did not state how many "others". For every viewpoint, no matter how absurd, there are always supporters. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
-
I´ve been quite sleepless in the last weeks... dont´t know if I´ve drinked too much coffee (or chimarrão). Fact is... i can´t sleep well. Does anyone have the same problem ? Does anyone have a solution (drugs not accepted) ? Mauricio Ritter Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank
Hmmmm, a natural remedy? There's this medicinal herb you can get, and you smoke it....it's very soothing.:cool: Josh Knox that-guy.net
"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away, and you have their shoes." - author unknown -
I´ve been quite sleepless in the last weeks... dont´t know if I´ve drinked too much coffee (or chimarrão). Fact is... i can´t sleep well. Does anyone have the same problem ? Does anyone have a solution (drugs not accepted) ? Mauricio Ritter Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank
-
Mauricio Ritter wrote: I hate pills... prefer natural medicine... I know of a fool-proof natural method for getting rid of stress and making you relaxed, but you'd need a box of tissue (or a partner who's openminded)... (j/k) ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
-
David Wulff wrote: I know of a fool-proof natural method for getting rid of stress and making you relaxed, but you'd need a box of tissue (or a partner who's openminded)... Yes that should work :-)
Thank you! (See Martin: even the female CPians understand a joke when they see one) ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk Aqkuoerian letter of the day:
-
David Wulff wrote: My statement is open ended, and you can insert whatever the hell you like in there, be it man, woman or goat. That was by design to stop people who are high on themselves and their social/peer standings from initiating attacks on my character. Well said David. Martin, your statements are a classic example of why much of the world feel the way they do about americans. :((
As an American, I sadly have to agree with you, Robert. Jon Sagara What about :bob:?
-
Martin Marvinski wrote: That part, in the context you used it, inferred a female. You know it, and I know it. If I wanted to infer a female, I would have said "woman". My statement is open ended, and you can insert whatever the hell you like in there, be it man, woman or goat. That was by design to stop people who are high on themselves and their social/peer standings from initiating attacks on my character. Obviously this did not work. And you can infer what you like from that. Martin Marvinski wrote: I don't think they teach you not to think of women as only sexual ojects because you probably don't have Health class in England like we have in the U.S. To look at it a different way; we don' need specific classes to teach us this, because it is at the core of everything we see and do from the age we learn how to walk and talk. We have life skills lessons, which teach us (surprisingly) skills we will need in life. Sexual equality is taught to us "specifically" in Primary school RE classes, though it need not be. (I believe you call them elementary schools). ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
David Wulff wrote: My statement is open ended, and you can insert whatever the hell you like in there, be it man, woman or goat. That was by design to stop people who are high on themselves and their social/peer standings from initiating attacks on my character. Well said David. Martin, your statements are a classic example of why much of the world feel the way they do about americans. :((
-
Martin Marvinski wrote: That part, in the context you used it, inferred a female. You know it, and I know it. If I wanted to infer a female, I would have said "woman". My statement is open ended, and you can insert whatever the hell you like in there, be it man, woman or goat. That was by design to stop people who are high on themselves and their social/peer standings from initiating attacks on my character. Obviously this did not work. And you can infer what you like from that. Martin Marvinski wrote: I don't think they teach you not to think of women as only sexual ojects because you probably don't have Health class in England like we have in the U.S. To look at it a different way; we don' need specific classes to teach us this, because it is at the core of everything we see and do from the age we learn how to walk and talk. We have life skills lessons, which teach us (surprisingly) skills we will need in life. Sexual equality is taught to us "specifically" in Primary school RE classes, though it need not be. (I believe you call them elementary schools). ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk "DON'T MOVE! It can't see you if you don't move" - Sam Neil talking to me as John Simmons walked into the office.
Bravo, David! Good shot:-)
-
Lets have others comment on it. I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased. I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. If they don't, then I appologise, but if everyone agrees that you meant it that way, I retract my appology. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Martin Marvinski wrote: others will read your orginal post the same way I have Not a chance! It was completely gender-neutral, perfectly PC.
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: If you drink more than 2 cups of coffee a day, you might want to try cutting down for a while and see if that helps I drinked 6 a day... cutted to 2... didn´t help... I´ll try to drink just chimarrão from now on.. Mauricio Ritter Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank
Can you get chamomile tea in Brazil? It's quite tasty and very relaxing, without the diuretic properties of my usual sedative (Budweiser).
-
I used to think too much when I was going to sleep. I'd find myself lying there thinking about everything and nothing all at the same time. I would toss and turn until the wee morning hours. I find that if I veg out, completely relax, and clear my mind of everything, I never have any problems falling alseep. So relax, don't think about anything (don't even think about not thinking about anything), and enjoy your rest. :) Works for me. I can only hope it works for you. Jon Sagara What about :bob:?
Jon Sagara wrote: don't think about anything (don't even think about not thinking about anything), and enjoy your rest. If you could bottle that, I'm sure you'd be the worlds most popular person. And for all the best reasons. :) Any hints on how you manage to achieve such a blissfull sounding state of mind :confused:
-
Lets have others comment on it. I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased. I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. If they don't, then I appologise, but if everyone agrees that you meant it that way, I retract my appology. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Martin Marvinski wrote: I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. I did not find anything derogatory to anyone or anything in what David said in his original post. The first derogatory statement in your exchange with David was made by you, Martin: Martin Marvinski wrote: Just because England is a backwards country doesn't excuse you from posting such chauvinistic rhetoric online. I live in US, but I've come here from Russia and I know first hand how it feels when someone who knows nothing about your country throwing insulting statements like that at you. "You Russians...", "You Brits...", "You --insert any country, nationality, religion--..." I find your statement about England to be ignorant and insulting. And it is your apology to David that is due as far as I concern.
-
David Wulff wrote: Besides whic, what part of that statement was chauvinistic, and what part mentioned women? The part where you wrote "a box of tissue or a willing partner" was quite demeaning to women. I really can't blame you for that comment because the UK is clearly not training it's citizens and residents about the modern world of equality among the sexes. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
I am from the US and I don't see anything wrong with what he wrote! Lighten up. :laugh:
-
Lets have others comment on it. I believe that you meant what you inferred and are now embarrased. I bet that others will read your orginal post the same way I have. If they don't, then I appologise, but if everyone agrees that you meant it that way, I retract my appology. I :love: Microsoft and :bob:
Martin, although I enjoy your openly anti-English sentiments, I will have to agree with the others. Your critique of David's comments are way out of line. "Thank you, thank you very much" Elvis.