RSA implementation
-
hi ppl, I've been looking around for a while now, and I still can't find a simple, minimum & easy to use RSA implementation (and free of course). If know of such implementation, I'd appreciate some info :) I need to be able to use the implementation in a shareware app, but only for my protection scheme, i.e. internal use. Further on, MFC or any other framework should not be used (so, plain Win32 API or STL are good:|) I know this is a bit too specific, but if anyone knows anything, it would be a great help:) --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net
-
hi ppl, I've been looking around for a while now, and I still can't find a simple, minimum & easy to use RSA implementation (and free of course). If know of such implementation, I'd appreciate some info :) I need to be able to use the implementation in a shareware app, but only for my protection scheme, i.e. internal use. Further on, MFC or any other framework should not be used (so, plain Win32 API or STL are good:|) I know this is a bit too specific, but if anyone knows anything, it would be a great help:) --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net
crypto++ is what i use. it's not simple, it's not small, and it's not easy to use. but it works. :) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
crypto++ is what i use. it's not simple, it's not small, and it's not easy to use. but it works. :) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
There is also a version from RSA laboratories... It is much smaller and easier to use... but I've forgotten the download link :(. Don't try it, just do it! ;-)
-
crypto++ is what i use. it's not simple, it's not small, and it's not easy to use. but it works. :) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
yeeeees :-) I've tried that, I couldn't get the thing working.. :doh: Anyways, since RSA is going to be a part of anti-crack-hack-slash:) protection, I think it would be unwise to use crypto++ since it's a separate module..could be easily avoided & my proggy would eventually get hacked (like that's not gonna happen anyway:rolleyes:) But I might take a closer look whatsoever, thanx :cool: --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net
-
There is also a version from RSA laboratories... It is much smaller and easier to use... but I've forgotten the download link :(. Don't try it, just do it! ;-)
I've been digging through RSA labs site for a loooong time, and all I could find is a bunch of docs:confused: Is there another download location for RSA stuff?? thx:cool: --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net
-
yeeeees :-) I've tried that, I couldn't get the thing working.. :doh: Anyways, since RSA is going to be a part of anti-crack-hack-slash:) protection, I think it would be unwise to use crypto++ since it's a separate module..could be easily avoided & my proggy would eventually get hacked (like that's not gonna happen anyway:rolleyes:) But I might take a closer look whatsoever, thanx :cool: --- YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!! http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org http://t1tan.cjb.net
T1TAN wrote: I think it would be unwise to use crypto++ since it's a separate module.. just use static linking. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker