Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger

EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javahtmlcomtutorialquestion
24 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    It makes sense to me, Kodak must not be making too much money from cameras nowadays. I agree with you, it's all stupid. What if all branches of science could patent it's fundamentals ? How would we move beyond them if other scientists could not reuse them ? Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Corinna John
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Are you sure you're on topic? The directive that is likely to be cancelled today is only about patents on computer programs. _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T T Jenniges

      I hate software patents. I hope the EU does away with most of the protections. I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents that are allowed here in the US. For example: http://news.com.com/Kodak+wins+Java+patent+suit/2100-1014_3-5394765.html[^] How do the other SW engineers on this board feel about SW Patents? EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger Related Article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050705/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_software_patents[^]

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mathias B
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      I can only hope that our european deputies think about the consequences of their decision. Personally I hope that the bill about software patents will be rejected, because I too, fear that small businesses will lose ground towards greater software firms. Also I think that a law like this will provoke and complicate patent lawsuits. I think it would do more damage than it would help protect innovations. Regards Mathias P.S.: I am from Germany.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Vikram A Punathambekar

        TonyJ wrote: I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents Do you mean to say you're an American who's sick of some of the silly SW patents? :) There are lots of people on CP who're not native speakers of English, and I can understand it when they make mistakes. But when native English speakers make glaring errors or use 'gangsta spelling', it p*sses me off. :doh: Cheers, Vikram.


        http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mathias B
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        I think it's kind of annoying that such an important topic get's this kind of feedback! I don't like gangsta style spelling, but I don't hate it either. Also we had this conversation about gangsta style some days ago, now calm down and head on to the more important things. Regards Mathias

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T T Jenniges

          I hate software patents. I hope the EU does away with most of the protections. I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents that are allowed here in the US. For example: http://news.com.com/Kodak+wins+Java+patent+suit/2100-1014_3-5394765.html[^] How do the other SW engineers on this board feel about SW Patents? EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger Related Article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050705/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_software_patents[^]

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Corinna John
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a.QckuA8V3H8&refer=home[^] Everything will go on as it does today (every EU member country has its own laws about patents), there'll be no software patents in general. :) _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

          V 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mathias B

            I can only hope that our european deputies think about the consequences of their decision. Personally I hope that the bill about software patents will be rejected, because I too, fear that small businesses will lose ground towards greater software firms. Also I think that a law like this will provoke and complicate patent lawsuits. I think it would do more damage than it would help protect innovations. Regards Mathias P.S.: I am from Germany.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Corinna John
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Mathias Buerklin wrote: I hope that the bill about software patents will be reje Yeah, we've won! ;) The bill has been rejected. Certain big companies will try to reboot the CreateLaw.exe process, but it will take a loooooong time... _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V Vikram A Punathambekar

              Given the number of people who interchange whose and who's, and your and you're; I wish I were de-sanitized desensitized. But I'm not. :sigh: They hurt my eyes, much like misaligned braces. :rolleyes: Cheers, Vikram.


              http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

              E Offline
              E Offline
              El Corazon
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Vikram A Punathambekar wrote: They hurt my eyes, Better put me on your ignore list. :rolleyes: _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Corinna John

                http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a.QckuA8V3H8&refer=home[^] Everything will go on as it does today (every EU member country has its own laws about patents), there'll be no software patents in general. :) _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

                V Offline
                V Offline
                Vikram A Punathambekar
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Somehow, your subject line reminded me of the Deus Ex Machina from Revolutions. :rolleyes: BTW, good news. Cheers, Vikram.


                http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "I don't have time to read all that, but I do believe those stats to be ludicrous." — Stan Shannon.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                  TonyJ wrote: I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents Do you mean to say you're an American who's sick of some of the silly SW patents? :) There are lots of people on CP who're not native speakers of English, and I can understand it when they make mistakes. But when native English speakers make glaring errors or use 'gangsta spelling', it p*sses me off. :doh: Cheers, Vikram.


                  http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  T Jenniges
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  Vikram, Let us all bow down to your superior intellect and master spelling abilities. Could it be that I know the difference between "who's" and "whose" and made a mistake while writing fast and multi-tasking. You are an ass! Go screw your goat! Any mistakes here?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                    TonyJ wrote: I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents Do you mean to say you're an American who's sick of some of the silly SW patents? :) There are lots of people on CP who're not native speakers of English, and I can understand it when they make mistakes. But when native English speakers make glaring errors or use 'gangsta spelling', it p*sses me off. :doh: Cheers, Vikram.


                    http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    T Jenniges
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    By the way I've never seen the contraction "who're" before. Maybe you were thinking of your mother when you invented that word. Look it up on dictionary.com if you need help. I can't stand people who correct other's grammar and then are foolish enough to make a mistake while doing so.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Corinna John

                      Are you sure you're on topic? The directive that is likely to be cancelled today is only about patents on computer programs. _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christian Graus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      Absolutely - the patent in question was not a specific algorithm, but a style of writing code. It sounded to me like a design pattern more than anything. so imagine if a design pattern could be copyrighted, it would be the same as copyrighting the fact that petrol burns. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups