VS 2003/2005 coexistence?
-
Yes. :)
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
What about compatibility...do i need to install .net 1.1 seperately in order to run old applications or they will run using .net 2.0 too ? is it downward compatible with version 1.0 and 1.1 ?
-
Install first VS2003 and then VS2005 Al
-
Yes, many of us here run both concurrently. Tom Archer (blog) Program Manager MSDN Online (Windows Vista and Visual C++) MICROSOFT
-
where are you buying it from ? Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
where are you buying it from ? Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
Yes, many of us here run both concurrently. Tom Archer (blog) Program Manager MSDN Online (Windows Vista and Visual C++) MICROSOFT
-
Hey Ravi You can have VC++ 6, VS.NET 2003 and VS 2005 all running on the same machine. Nish
-
Install first VS2003 and then VS2005 Al
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
Sadly, I can't buy it from CP
nobody can. i haven't seen it anywhere, yet. the closest i've found is a 4-5 week shipping date at Amazon. (no MSDN subscription) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
Hey Ravi You can have VC++ 6, VS.NET 2003 and VS 2005 all running on the same machine. Nish
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
Sadly, I can't buy it from CP
nobody can. i haven't seen it anywhere, yet. the closest i've found is a 4-5 week shipping date at Amazon. (no MSDN subscription) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
VC7.1, VS2003
Those're the same, aren't they... :~
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
VC7.1, VS2003
Those're the same, aren't they... :~
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
It's best to install 2003 first but yes the co-exist nicely Jared Parsons jaredp@beanseed.org http://spaces.msn.com/members/jaredp/
-
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
VC7.1, VS2003
Those're the same, aren't they... :~
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
VC7.0 == VS2002 VC7.1 == VS2003
-
VC7.0 == VS2002 VC7.1 == VS2003
Yeah. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't shooting my mouth off by asserting something that wasn't true. I haven't worked with VS 2002/2003 in a looong time.
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
I see everyone gave the same answer. Mine is the same, but I'm not just saying what's been said - if you're going to use ASP.NET, then you should create shortcuts to aspnet_regiis in both folders so you can swap with version you're using. The other thing is, once you have 2005 installed, you need to open 2003 to open a 2003 project, you can't double click on it. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
-
Yes, I'm running a large application base with 2003/2005 on the same box, things to watch out for are previewcontrol and crystal, both suck - big time. Blogless
Have you had problems with crystal co-habitating? I haven't yet but if you have PLEASE..more detail! Thanks, ed ~"Watch your thoughts; they become your words. Watch your words they become your actions. Watch your actions; they become your habits. Watch your habits; they become your character. Watch your character; it becomes your destiny." -Frank Outlaw.