How logo can you go??? Round II...
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
Number 9, Number 9, Number 9. The frog on the banded circle is an really good touch. Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Remember that in Texas, Gun Control is hitting what you aim at. [Richard Stringer] Nice sig! [Tim Deveaux on Matt Newman's sig with a quote from me]
-
It's not the logos that I don't like. I know that this is a matter of personal taste too, but have you considered changing the name "Code-Frog"? Why a frog? As much as the frog looking left seems "looking to the past", a frog doesn't relate to anything good in programming, IMHO. Your nick name in CP could continue as that, though... :) From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
Well, there's a longer answer to that than you might think. The frog ties into some other things and it really does fit. Maybe not from a programming standpoint but when you really think about even if I was "Stack Heap Push" software how many people walking around that are not programmers will know or care? I thought about using programming in the name and ultimately I just decided that I'd identify with a bit of who I am and be a bit Generic in the name. There's literally 1000's of businesses and names that have zero corolation... SonicWALL - Firewall company. What does sound have to do with it? Microsoft - Admittedly it's household now but at the time Micro and Soft were pretty disjoint. Fabric softener maybe? Oracle - Reference Oracle and tell me what that has to do with databases? There's a bajillion names that are just the guys name or a construct of it: Linux - Linus Torvalds and Unix. They picked a penguin. Hmmmm... Intel - Now wait just a second. You working with Langley or the DOD why intel? I can go on and on. Ultimately, I wanted to something that would make people stop and reflect. If you see "Softwire" or "Netstone" or "Netegrity" or a million other plays on words you injest it as "technical" and that's all you remember. I wanted my choice of name to be puzzling and I wanted it to make people ask. Aside from that I think the name doesn't make you, you make the name. In my town my name is being made. I'd consider rebranding if things were not going so well but right now it's pretty apparent that so far all my decisions are adding up on the right side of the balance sheet.
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 12:52 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
Everyone's saying 9, but I'd shrink 6 down first, and see what it will look like as a header. In my opinion, the smaller version of 9 gets a little too small in the text, and I think the fact that the frog doesn't pop out as much on 6 would enable the text of 6 to be a little bigger and more legible. On top of that, on your 'fun' days, #6 would be more balanced when you stuck it's tongue out over the logo, and caught a purple fly!
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
#9 definately maybe try the globe with the darker gridding from #1 good work and I like your reasoning in other post as to why code-frog. Good thinking.
-
Everyone's saying 9, but I'd shrink 6 down first, and see what it will look like as a header. In my opinion, the smaller version of 9 gets a little too small in the text, and I think the fact that the frog doesn't pop out as much on 6 would enable the text of 6 to be a little bigger and more legible. On top of that, on your 'fun' days, #6 would be more balanced when you stuck it's tongue out over the logo, and caught a purple fly!
Oh. I just figured out what was really bugging me about the small version of 9. I had the impresson that something was fuzzy, and that's why I said the text was a little small. The real problem is that the lines in the globe appear to fuzz, because of the shade of gray and the thickness of the lines. That makes the whole thing come off a little flat to me. The outline on the words might also be made a little darker, to improve it. But the full-size version doesn't have those problems as much. (DO NOT look at my site, to judge my graphics skills, though :) !)
-
Well, there's a longer answer to that than you might think. The frog ties into some other things and it really does fit. Maybe not from a programming standpoint but when you really think about even if I was "Stack Heap Push" software how many people walking around that are not programmers will know or care? I thought about using programming in the name and ultimately I just decided that I'd identify with a bit of who I am and be a bit Generic in the name. There's literally 1000's of businesses and names that have zero corolation... SonicWALL - Firewall company. What does sound have to do with it? Microsoft - Admittedly it's household now but at the time Micro and Soft were pretty disjoint. Fabric softener maybe? Oracle - Reference Oracle and tell me what that has to do with databases? There's a bajillion names that are just the guys name or a construct of it: Linux - Linus Torvalds and Unix. They picked a penguin. Hmmmm... Intel - Now wait just a second. You working with Langley or the DOD why intel? I can go on and on. Ultimately, I wanted to something that would make people stop and reflect. If you see "Softwire" or "Netstone" or "Netegrity" or a million other plays on words you injest it as "technical" and that's all you remember. I wanted my choice of name to be puzzling and I wanted it to make people ask. Aside from that I think the name doesn't make you, you make the name. In my town my name is being made. I'd consider rebranding if things were not going so well but right now it's pretty apparent that so far all my decisions are adding up on the right side of the balance sheet.
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 12:52 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
code-frog wrote:
Linux - Linus Torvalds and Unix. They picked a penguin. Hmmmm...
They're good at programming (some may question even this), not at marketing :-D
code-frog wrote:
Admittedly it's household now but at the time Micro and Soft were pretty disjoint.
I was a kid when they started and recall it clearly, I always thought it was "Software" for "Microcomputers"
code-frog wrote:
Oracle - Reference Oracle and tell me what that has to do with databases?
An oracle knows all.
code-frog wrote:
Aside from that I think the name doesn't make you, you make the name.
I agree. I only pointed it because in Brazil, a frog is often a symbol for something ugly, stupid and lazy (it just sits there the whole day). "Ugly as a frog", "Stupid as a frog", and "Lazy as a frog" are commonplace here. Maybe it's one of those cultural differences, and, in other countries that image is not the same. I wish you luck, though, I know how hard you work and you deserve success in your venture. Just don't forget, when your multi-million company starts spreading throughout the world, that a frog may project other images :-D From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
I'll have to go with 8 with minor modifications. Now the difference between 8 and 9 is the border of the globe. When made small the border is too sharp. I think it will look pretty col, at least in a small version: 8 if the lines of the globe would be the same color as the border of the globe on 9. I'm not much of a designer but this way the globe will be fuzzy, and add some kind of mystery to whether that's a globe or something else. There will be no problem being uninteligible because the frog practically says the word. regards, Mircea Many people spend their life going to sleep when they’re not sleepy and waking up while they still are.
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
I like #9 also, though I would keep the System Architect in all black, especially when it's smaller. I think more like it is on #2 would make it cleaner and easier to read. Also, the letter spacing looks too wide in CODE once you add the globe as the "O". It might be an illusion, but the F and R appear closer than the letters in CODE. Otherwise, I think it looks great. BW
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
-- Steven Wright -
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
I vote for #6 (in the over 50 group if you want to track clientel :) ) "Simplicity is more complicated than you think. But it’s well worth it” (Ron Jeffries)
-
code-frog wrote:
Linux - Linus Torvalds and Unix. They picked a penguin. Hmmmm...
They're good at programming (some may question even this), not at marketing :-D
code-frog wrote:
Admittedly it's household now but at the time Micro and Soft were pretty disjoint.
I was a kid when they started and recall it clearly, I always thought it was "Software" for "Microcomputers"
code-frog wrote:
Oracle - Reference Oracle and tell me what that has to do with databases?
An oracle knows all.
code-frog wrote:
Aside from that I think the name doesn't make you, you make the name.
I agree. I only pointed it because in Brazil, a frog is often a symbol for something ugly, stupid and lazy (it just sits there the whole day). "Ugly as a frog", "Stupid as a frog", and "Lazy as a frog" are commonplace here. Maybe it's one of those cultural differences, and, in other countries that image is not the same. I wish you luck, though, I know how hard you work and you deserve success in your venture. Just don't forget, when your multi-million company starts spreading throughout the world, that a frog may project other images :-D From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
Yes an Oracle knows all. The only thing a database does is store all it certainly won't tell you anything. An application sitting on the database would more logically be called Oracle. I agree with you on the cultural difference but as businesses and countries become international that way of thinking needs to be bi-directional. People in Brazil just need to realize, "Stupid Americans, don't they know what that means." Then they'll go on to say, "Well, he may not know that but he's damned good with this other stuff. Let's do business.";P In the end everyone wins. For example I now have Daniel Turini in Brazil. Daniel will tell people, "Nevermind his logo and name. He's a dumb American in that regard. He's really good with what you need though so give him a call." See it's all good.;) - Rex
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-
Yes an Oracle knows all. The only thing a database does is store all it certainly won't tell you anything. An application sitting on the database would more logically be called Oracle. I agree with you on the cultural difference but as businesses and countries become international that way of thinking needs to be bi-directional. People in Brazil just need to realize, "Stupid Americans, don't they know what that means." Then they'll go on to say, "Well, he may not know that but he's damned good with this other stuff. Let's do business.";P In the end everyone wins. For example I now have Daniel Turini in Brazil. Daniel will tell people, "Nevermind his logo and name. He's a dumb American in that regard. He's really good with what you need though so give him a call." See it's all good.;) - Rex
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
code-frog wrote:
I agree with you on the cultural difference but as businesses and countries become international that way of thinking needs to be bi-directional. People in Brazil just need to realize, "Stupid Americans, don't they know what that means." Then they'll go on to say, "Well, he may not know that but he's damned good with this other stuff. Let's do business."
And you can always rename it. You see, the Ford Pinto here was renamed to Ford Corcel, because "Pinto" here is something like "Dick" in English. Needless to say, those were the 70's, when men bought cars, and not too much of them wanted to sit on a "Pinto" :-D From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
Looks like 9... The tigress is here :-D
-
code-frog wrote:
I agree with you on the cultural difference but as businesses and countries become international that way of thinking needs to be bi-directional. People in Brazil just need to realize, "Stupid Americans, don't they know what that means." Then they'll go on to say, "Well, he may not know that but he's damned good with this other stuff. Let's do business."
And you can always rename it. You see, the Ford Pinto here was renamed to Ford Corcel, because "Pinto" here is something like "Dick" in English. Needless to say, those were the 70's, when men bought cars, and not too much of them wanted to sit on a "Pinto" :-D From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
OH! Man... Yeah, true enough.:laugh:
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005
-
I vote for #6 (in the over 50 group if you want to track clientel :) ) "Simplicity is more complicated than you think. But it’s well worth it” (Ron Jeffries)
-
code-frog wrote:
I agree with you on the cultural difference but as businesses and countries become international that way of thinking needs to be bi-directional. People in Brazil just need to realize, "Stupid Americans, don't they know what that means." Then they'll go on to say, "Well, he may not know that but he's damned good with this other stuff. Let's do business."
And you can always rename it. You see, the Ford Pinto here was renamed to Ford Corcel, because "Pinto" here is something like "Dick" in English. Needless to say, those were the 70's, when men bought cars, and not too much of them wanted to sit on a "Pinto" :-D From the Churchdown Parish Magazine: "Would the Congregation please note that the bowl at the back of the Church, labelled 'For The Sick,' is for monetary donations only."
-
This is the thing about organization of posts here. There's no way to bump a post back up and the replies don't notify everyone in the topic only the person you reply to. Hence me title with a play on "how low can I go" as I feel like this is semi-spam. So if you perceive it as spam I apologize *WAY* up-front. However you are my peers and quite honestly a very fine group of people who opinions I actually value pretty highly. (Read that as a compliment, I'm not always the best with wording.) So here is ROUND II. My wife suggested dumping the egg/rock and going for a wireframe and Jed also took a lot of the other feedback to heart so feel free to critique again. My first impressions are that I really like it. It stayed the same but it's subtley different to. Most importantly John Simmons suggestion was brought to life. I like it both ways. Be curious to see what he thinks and others who also agreed with him. I've gotten some interest emails from people wondering how expensive Jed is. I think his rates are incredibly good. I send any work I can his way because he's great to work with. If you want feel free to contact him directly with questions and just reference his work on my logo as a starting point. His email is jedREMOVEsplitREMOVE@hotmailREMOVE.com I think he'd be happy to answer questions and provide the same type of service if you are interested. Second Batch of Logo Artwork courtesy of Jed Split Graphics[^]
Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.
-- modified at 11:50 Wednesday 14th December, 2005