Joe Woodbury wrote: We plagiarize better than GPT-4. You only need to look at our moderation queue and the S&A forum :doh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

I haven't used IBM's Watson AI but have found Google's Assistant to be the most powerful and accurate Internet search AI. Definitely miles ahead of Apple's Siri and Amazon's Alexa which is highly inaccurate and relies too much on out-of-date and totally inaccurate data. Google is at the forefront IMO for AI Internet search, fast, accurate and reliable with a large developer community and loads of dev off-shot projects and applications. OpenAI is by far the most advanced and powerful AI I've ever used. It blew my mind! I use it daily, but without direct Internet access it's limited to its periodic deep-learning data updates. That said, its incredible knowledge base and ability to engage in a very natural human like way (which at times is scarily close to something approaching human consciousness) makes OpenAI's ChatGPT a really unique special and powerful AI-assistant tool that has the ability to apply knowledge in meaingful and insightful ways beyond just spitting out data searched from Internet like Google Assistant does other AI's. OpenAI's ChatGPT is fluent in over 100 human spoken languages (plus dozens of computer languages) and there's hardly any task it can't perform whether it be writing elegent source code, books, or helping you problem-solve, research and develop new ideas. If/when OpenAI eventually gets full Internet access and real-time data it will be truly awesome.

:D Some kind of goat, anyway. TTFN - Kent

That dates us!

obermd wrote: how to embed them with empathy for humans and humanity. as if we humans were so good with that emp.. how was it? M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

I'd say it's not very effective. At the end of the day during the New Hampshire Primary, I was looking for a good ticker on tracking the results. Bing's LLM came back and said that Trump had won all (100%) the republican votes. The problem was that at that point in time, only Dixville Notch had reported in and Nikki Haley had all 6 votes.

Kent Sharkey wrote: The llama kicks back And it even wants to bite: Franklin Graves on LinkedIn[^] Mircea

I empathize with everything Hubert writes. Unfortunately, like most things nowadays, it's too late to change how software is developed, short of another dinosaur killing asteroid or man-made catastrophe. My money is on the man-made catastrophe option. (Though one other option is for an enlightened project manager to "just say no", but as I was told in my 20's, "I can't put 'I used Marc's software development paradigms' on my resume." I kid you not. Latest Articles: A Lightweight Thread Safe In-Memory Keyed Generic Cache Collection Service A Dynamic Where Implementation for Entity Framework

Kent Sharkey wrote: For all your GPT needs That start looking as the classified messages of the newspapers :laugh: :laugh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Maybe its training data has too many instances of this - "Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime".

Definitively, the guys of the marketing department must be enjoying the buzzword bingo party... :laugh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Quote: The creators of GPTs won’t be able to view the chats people are having with them, and it’s unclear what high-level usage data they’ll get access to. OpenAI says it will be monitoring activity to block things like fraud, hate speech, and “adult themes.” Of course... Same as FB, Google and Co. M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Sean Ewington wrote: A Utopia, or a wretched hive of scum and villainy? The first moments, an Utopia. Some seconds later, a wretched hive of scum and villainy. As always... :sigh: :sigh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

:thumbsup: indeed ... lately I've seen research papers about Theory of Mind for LLMs (for example [https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01660\](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01660) - this one dates from 4 Sep 2023), but I am not sure if this supersedes the Turing test. Intuitively, I would say yes ...

I hear they can be very stealthy. :suss: cheers Chris Maunder