Joint Collection Project
-
This is a message for people who have been developping missing collection in .Net (such as sets, deque, etc...) or are simply missing those for every day life. The objective is collect in a single project a number of forgotten data structures for .Net. If you are interrested to contribute, observe or test, you can register at http://ncollection.tigris.org[^] Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
Jumping the gun a bit? :doh: ;P Messages Your account does not have the "Project Page - View" permission needed for you to access the page you requested in the ncollection project (view your permissions). Either ask the project administrator for more permission, or log in using a different account. You are currently logged in as leppie. top secret
-
Jumping the gun a bit? :doh: ;P Messages Your account does not have the "Project Page - View" permission needed for you to access the page you requested in the ncollection project (view your permissions). Either ask the project administrator for more permission, or log in using a different account. You are currently logged in as leppie. top secret
Yep, let say I have started the project 2 hours ago :) Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
-
This is a message for people who have been developping missing collection in .Net (such as sets, deque, etc...) or are simply missing those for every day life. The objective is collect in a single project a number of forgotten data structures for .Net. If you are interrested to contribute, observe or test, you can register at http://ncollection.tigris.org[^] Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
On a lighter side, once you have collected all these joints, who will smoke them? :laugh: top secret
-
On a lighter side, once you have collected all these joints, who will smoke them? :laugh: top secret
I'm more a beer-drinker type but I'm sure I could find people interrested for that kind of collection traversal. Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
-
This is a message for people who have been developping missing collection in .Net (such as sets, deque, etc...) or are simply missing those for every day life. The objective is collect in a single project a number of forgotten data structures for .Net. If you are interrested to contribute, observe or test, you can register at http://ncollection.tigris.org[^] Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
Don't you think it would be better to wait for generics for such exercise?
-
Don't you think it would be better to wait for generics for such exercise?
Maybe, on the other side, there are already at least 5 data structures scatered on CodeProject, not mentionning other internet resources, so the material is already there. Besides, I do not think the "upgrade" to generics will be too painfull. The most cool feature, from a colleciton implementaiton view, is the new way of defining iterators which will be much more easier. Besides, creating the framework to test the fixture will not be lost with generics. Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
-
This is a message for people who have been developping missing collection in .Net (such as sets, deque, etc...) or are simply missing those for every day life. The objective is collect in a single project a number of forgotten data structures for .Net. If you are interrested to contribute, observe or test, you can register at http://ncollection.tigris.org[^] Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
I saw you mention this idea earlier today (well, I saw it earlier today) and think it's a neat idea, but let me suggestion something: it's ".NET", not ".Net" or ".net" (in which case the latter is reserved for use by Microsoft and only in logos). This is documented on Microsoft's site.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles
-
I saw you mention this idea earlier today (well, I saw it earlier today) and think it's a neat idea, but let me suggestion something: it's ".NET", not ".Net" or ".net" (in which case the latter is reserved for use by Microsoft and only in logos). This is documented on Microsoft's site.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles
:) don't hesitate to sneak in the project... Heath Stewart wrote: it's ".NET", not ".Net" or ".net" Aaaargh, am I going to get sue for this! Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
-
:) don't hesitate to sneak in the project... Heath Stewart wrote: it's ".NET", not ".Net" or ".net" Aaaargh, am I going to get sue for this! Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph
Jonathan de Halleux wrote: Aaaargh, am I going to get sue for this! No, not unless you trademark a product with ".NET" (or any variant) in it and make enough money for Microsoft to care about (and even then, they might not so long as you're supporting their cause, but IANAL). Just thought since you're making a go of this and will probably want it to look nice/official/whatever, you might want to use proper casing. :)
Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles
-
Jonathan de Halleux wrote: Aaaargh, am I going to get sue for this! No, not unless you trademark a product with ".NET" (or any variant) in it and make enough money for Microsoft to care about (and even then, they might not so long as you're supporting their cause, but IANAL). Just thought since you're making a go of this and will probably want it to look nice/official/whatever, you might want to use proper casing. :)
Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles
Thanks for the tip, I'll keep on the back of my head... Jonathan de Halleux - www.dotnetwiki.org - MbUnit - QuickGraph