Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Coke vs Pepsi

Coke vs Pepsi

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
cssvisual-studiocomhelpquestion
43 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Daniel Turini

    Oh, my god, it was just a joke, don't inject coffee in any children, please! X| I've been told that the Kosher issue about coke is about their "secret formula". Furor fit laesa saepius patientia

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Daniel I and probably everyone else who read your post understood it as humour. I was merely saying that instant coffee has little or no caffeine, I like percolated coffee and many parents don't understand what drinks contain caffeine that they are giving to their young children. Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Christian Graus

      And MFC is better than STL Now thems fighting words !!! While CP was down on the weekend I went to Code Guru ( against my better judgement ) and most of the questions I answered the answer was something like: CArray is crap - use vector. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel Turini
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Having contact with several "Visual Basic OOP programmers", most of them with a strong Clipper and COBOL background, I have some sugestions to STL: 1. That < > chars when declaring types is weird: what are you comparing ? 2. What advantage is having STL source code if it is encrypted ? 3. Why STL do not uses a Variant type ? This should simplify everithing. 3. Why do I need declaring variables, anyway ? Good Visual Basic programmers just throw away these "Dim" and "Option Explicit" out of code. The compiler can then optimize variable scope, and it reduces source code polution. 4. You shouldn't be programming in C++ because Assembler is low level and not portable (this I've heard from a Java junkie) 5. MFC CString is better than STL string because Left, Right and Mid is just like Visual Basic 6. STL does not work: I just can't manage putting a single STL control in my form! (using VC resource editor) 7. C++ is garbage!! Why this work: CString s1 = "Test"; CString s2 = "Test2"; s1 += s2; And this do not work ? char *s1 = "Test"; char *s2 = "Test2"; s1 += s2; After several hours explaining the difference: "Visual Basic is much better, we can work with strings and do not need all this classes' overhead" I've heard most of these comming from real programmers. At least, they think they are real programmers. Furor fit laesa saepius patientia

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Daniel Turini

        Having contact with several "Visual Basic OOP programmers", most of them with a strong Clipper and COBOL background, I have some sugestions to STL: 1. That < > chars when declaring types is weird: what are you comparing ? 2. What advantage is having STL source code if it is encrypted ? 3. Why STL do not uses a Variant type ? This should simplify everithing. 3. Why do I need declaring variables, anyway ? Good Visual Basic programmers just throw away these "Dim" and "Option Explicit" out of code. The compiler can then optimize variable scope, and it reduces source code polution. 4. You shouldn't be programming in C++ because Assembler is low level and not portable (this I've heard from a Java junkie) 5. MFC CString is better than STL string because Left, Right and Mid is just like Visual Basic 6. STL does not work: I just can't manage putting a single STL control in my form! (using VC resource editor) 7. C++ is garbage!! Why this work: CString s1 = "Test"; CString s2 = "Test2"; s1 += s2; And this do not work ? char *s1 = "Test"; char *s2 = "Test2"; s1 += s2; After several hours explaining the difference: "Visual Basic is much better, we can work with strings and do not need all this classes' overhead" I've heard most of these comming from real programmers. At least, they think they are real programmers. Furor fit laesa saepius patientia

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Christian Graus
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        I was all fired up for war until I reread your post and realised you were quoting morons, not being one. This is priceless !!! Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups