Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Date representation in The Lounge

Date representation in The Lounge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
15 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Nordell
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Would it be possible to replace the single tick with "20"? When I read ..... Oct '01 it looks to me like the comment was entered on Oct 01, which most of the time is completely wrong. Spelling out 2001 doesn't steal too much space while it makes it quite obvious that I'm looking at the wrong column. Personally, I'd like it reformatted to yyyy to be able to look at the right edge (where no disturbing text is) to see when a comment was posted, but that's just me. /Mike

    D C E C 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Mike Nordell

      Would it be possible to replace the single tick with "20"? When I read ..... Oct '01 it looks to me like the comment was entered on Oct 01, which most of the time is completely wrong. Spelling out 2001 doesn't steal too much space while it makes it quite obvious that I'm looking at the wrong column. Personally, I'd like it reformatted to yyyy to be able to look at the right edge (where no disturbing text is) to see when a comment was posted, but that's just me. /Mike

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David Cunningham
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      which most of the time is completely wrong. Yeah, like 364 times out of 365, right? ;-P David http://www.dundas.com

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mike Nordell

        Would it be possible to replace the single tick with "20"? When I read ..... Oct '01 it looks to me like the comment was entered on Oct 01, which most of the time is completely wrong. Spelling out 2001 doesn't steal too much space while it makes it quite obvious that I'm looking at the wrong column. Personally, I'd like it reformatted to yyyy to be able to look at the right edge (where no disturbing text is) to see when a comment was posted, but that's just me. /Mike

        C Offline
        C Offline
        ColinDavies
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Mike I like the date fromat the way it is, the apostrophe denotes where the year starts. Different tastes I guess. Regardz Colin J Davies P.S I need beta testers for VMTU.

        Speed up your internet connection with VMTU

        Variable Maximum Transfer Unit, or VMTU is an algorithm for negotiating the packet sizes passed from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to your Internet TCP connection. The connection speed does not increase; the throughput of the modem is improved.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C ColinDavies

          Mike I like the date fromat the way it is, the apostrophe denotes where the year starts. Different tastes I guess. Regardz Colin J Davies P.S I need beta testers for VMTU.

          Speed up your internet connection with VMTU

          Variable Maximum Transfer Unit, or VMTU is an algorithm for negotiating the packet sizes passed from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to your Internet TCP connection. The connection speed does not increase; the throughput of the modem is improved.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          David Wulff
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          How about detecting when Mike is logged in, then wrapping the day-of-month portion of the date in <blink> tags. Then he could never get them mixed up... ;)

          :cool: -=:suss:=-

          Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David Wulff

            How about detecting when Mike is logged in, then wrapping the day-of-month portion of the date in <blink> tags. Then he could never get them mixed up... ;)

            :cool: -=:suss:=-

            Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mike Nordell
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! I however fail to see how your comment can not be interpreted as an invitation to a flamewar, since you basically called me an idiot by "Then he could never get them mixed up...". As I'd usually express it, "well f u c k you too". /Mike

            J D realJSOPR 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Mike Nordell

              So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! I however fail to see how your comment can not be interpreted as an invitation to a flamewar, since you basically called me an idiot by "Then he could never get them mixed up...". As I'd usually express it, "well f u c k you too". /Mike

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jon Sagara
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Being an American, when I first came to this site, the DD MM 'YY date format confused the bejeezus out of me, but I have since gotten used to it. I think it actually makes more sense than MM DD 'YY, but I do see some merit in having YYYY as opposed to 'YY. Short version: once you get used to it, you won't notice it anymore. Jon Sagara

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Nordell

                Would it be possible to replace the single tick with "20"? When I read ..... Oct '01 it looks to me like the comment was entered on Oct 01, which most of the time is completely wrong. Spelling out 2001 doesn't steal too much space while it makes it quite obvious that I'm looking at the wrong column. Personally, I'd like it reformatted to yyyy to be able to look at the right edge (where no disturbing text is) to see when a comment was posted, but that's just me. /Mike

                E Offline
                E Offline
                Eddie Velasquez
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I agree with this. I've been confused with the date format several times. I'm just used to the MM/DD/YY or MM/DD/YYYY format. Foot-and-Mouth disease is believed to be the first virus unable to spread through Microsoft Outlook

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mike Nordell

                  So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! I however fail to see how your comment can not be interpreted as an invitation to a flamewar, since you basically called me an idiot by "Then he could never get them mixed up...". As I'd usually express it, "well f u c k you too". /Mike

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Wulff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I wasn't intending to start a flame war, I was just taking the piss. (you'll notice I have a smilie in my signature by default to save misinterpretation).

                  :cool: -=:suss:=-

                  Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mike Nordell

                    So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! I however fail to see how your comment can not be interpreted as an invitation to a flamewar, since you basically called me an idiot by "Then he could never get them mixed up...". As I'd usually express it, "well f u c k you too". /Mike

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David Wulff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! Well now that you mention it - no. I get confused if I see the date as MM/DD/YY and you get confused if you see it as DD/MM/YY, soDD/MMM/YY is a short but clear method of displaying the date in a worldwide-fiendly fashion. DD/MMM/YYYY would'nt make much difference at all - if you don't notice a ' then what makes you think you'll notice a 20? Anyway, shouldn't the date and time stuff, etc, be based on the locale you selected in your profile? Chris, how about it?

                    :cool: -=:suss:=-

                    Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

                    U 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mike Nordell

                      Would it be possible to replace the single tick with "20"? When I read ..... Oct '01 it looks to me like the comment was entered on Oct 01, which most of the time is completely wrong. Spelling out 2001 doesn't steal too much space while it makes it quite obvious that I'm looking at the wrong column. Personally, I'd like it reformatted to yyyy to be able to look at the right edge (where no disturbing text is) to see when a comment was posted, but that's just me. /Mike

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christian Graus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The current date format rocks because it is easy to read, regardless of if you're in the US or not. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mike Nordell

                        So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! I however fail to see how your comment can not be interpreted as an invitation to a flamewar, since you basically called me an idiot by "Then he could never get them mixed up...". As I'd usually express it, "well f u c k you too". /Mike

                        realJSOPR Offline
                        realJSOPR Offline
                        realJSOP
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Ya know, only the kettle cares if it's called "black". :) "...the staggering layers of obcenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D David Wulff

                          So you don't see neither redundancy nor the possibility to misunderstand the year represenatation here? Good for you! Well now that you mention it - no. I get confused if I see the date as MM/DD/YY and you get confused if you see it as DD/MM/YY, soDD/MMM/YY is a short but clear method of displaying the date in a worldwide-fiendly fashion. DD/MMM/YYYY would'nt make much difference at all - if you don't notice a ' then what makes you think you'll notice a 20? Anyway, shouldn't the date and time stuff, etc, be based on the locale you selected in your profile? Chris, how about it?

                          :cool: -=:suss:=-

                          Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

                          U Offline
                          U Offline
                          Uwe Keim
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          When the User-Profiles would get an additional field called 'Locale ID', I (living in Germany) would enter "DE", You could enter "US", etc. Now when rendering a page, Chris could simply call SetLocale with the locale ID of the logged on user. More info: SetLocale Function in MSDN. -- See me: www.magerquark.de Want a job? www.zeta-software.de/jobs

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D David Cunningham

                            which most of the time is completely wrong. Yeah, like 364 times out of 365, right? ;-P David http://www.dundas.com

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            And 365 time out of 366 last year. :-D Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D David Wulff

                              I wasn't intending to start a flame war, I was just taking the piss. (you'll notice I have a smilie in my signature by default to save misinterpretation).

                              :cool: -=:suss:=-

                              Dr David Wulff, Phd Aqkuoerian Sciences dwulff@battleaxesoftware.nospam.com Founder of The BLA iF yuo find speeling mistkaes, don;t blaem me, blaem my keybord.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mike Nordell
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              OK. Sorry. I was a bit itchy, though I still find your comment insulting. Perhaps it's considered polite to speak about OP's in third person where you come from? What I was referring to was the fact that the rightmost position is aligned to something the human eye easily catches; the vertical right border. As such, it would be faster to notice changes in that "column" than it would be to back-track every line to see the date (by several orders of magnitude). That was basically what my comment was about: Seeing "'01" right-aligned for every comment (every _line_ that is not expanded) makes less sense (to me) than to see the date the comment was entered, when you without scanning every line "backwards" (from right to left) would see date the comment was entered. Perhaps it could keep me from getting it "mixed up". Perhaps it would be a step forward in usability and browseability? /Mike

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Eddie Velasquez

                                I agree with this. I've been confused with the date format several times. I'm just used to the MM/DD/YY or MM/DD/YYYY format. Foot-and-Mouth disease is believed to be the first virus unable to spread through Microsoft Outlook

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mike Nordell
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                This is something I don't understand. In our number system(s) we have the value of numbers ordered from right to left in increasing importance/value, but they are read from left to right since the leftmost position is the "most significant" - the largest - number. How come american (and perhaps others) dates are expressed in a completely illogical order where the middle-most "number" (month) is expressed first, then the "least significant" number (day) and finally the "most significant" (year)? Wouldn't "y m d" (disregarding separators or represenation) be the most natural order?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups