Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. 05-05-05 5:05

05-05-05 5:05

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
8 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Joshua Nussbaum
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Has just past * * Eastern standard time 60% of statistics are made up on the spot

    S M A 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Joshua Nussbaum

      Has just past * * Eastern standard time 60% of statistics are made up on the spot

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Steve Mayfield
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      technically it was 12 hours ago... :-D Steve

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Joshua Nussbaum

        Has just past * * Eastern standard time 60% of statistics are made up on the spot

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Marc Clifton
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It's interesting how we place significance on a combination of numbers that isn't any different from any other combination except how they relate to each other. At least, in terms that we can easily grasp. So, will the anti-Christ be born on 06-06-06 06:06:06? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing YAPO

        J R 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          It's interesting how we place significance on a combination of numbers that isn't any different from any other combination except how they relate to each other. At least, in terms that we can easily grasp. So, will the anti-Christ be born on 06-06-06 06:06:06? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing YAPO

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jorgen Sigvardsson
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Marc Clifton wrote: So, will the anti-Christ be born on 06-06-06 06:06:06? It'll be twins. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

            Marc Clifton wrote: So, will the anti-Christ be born on 06-06-06 06:06:06? It'll be twins. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Ryan Binns
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: It'll be twins Or sextuplets :rolleyes:

            Ryan

            "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Joshua Nussbaum

              Has just past * * Eastern standard time 60% of statistics are made up on the spot

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Arsalan Malik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              No, absolutly wrong:doh: 05-05-05 5:05 passed about 2000 years back. This is year 2005, not 5.:-D ARSALAN MALIK

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                It's interesting how we place significance on a combination of numbers that isn't any different from any other combination except how they relate to each other. At least, in terms that we can easily grasp. So, will the anti-Christ be born on 06-06-06 06:06:06? Marc MyXaml Advanced Unit Testing YAPO

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Richard Parsons
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Well "technically" there are already many anti-christ among us according to the apostle John. :) Sorry had to take advantage of that :cool: -Richard

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Arsalan Malik

                  No, absolutly wrong:doh: 05-05-05 5:05 passed about 2000 years back. This is year 2005, not 5.:-D ARSALAN MALIK

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary Kirkham
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  ...and 2010 years back :) Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliot Me blog, You read

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups