Google Trying To Patent Ads In RSS Feeds?
-
-
interesting survey. but i'd vote
Confusing Navigationwith top priority. :^) /matthiasI love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
[Douglas Adams] -
Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. Why does everything in this world have to be polluted by ads! Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. Why does everything in this world have to be polluted by ads! Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
Michael P Butler wrote: Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. :laugh::laugh: Let's hope!!! Let's hope!!!
-
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Google Trying To Patent Ads In RSS Feeds? Google: "Don't be evil" (as evil as Redmond) :laugh::laugh::laugh:
-
Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. Why does everything in this world have to be polluted by ads! Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
So content producers can get paid. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
-
So content producers can get paid. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
Paul Watson wrote: So content producers can get paid. I'm all for content producers getting paid, I'm just to not sure why the have to place ads in RSS feeds. If they want people to view their web-site and their ads, they only need to place part of the content's text into the RSS feed. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Paul Watson wrote: So content producers can get paid. I'm all for content producers getting paid, I'm just to not sure why the have to place ads in RSS feeds. If they want people to view their web-site and their ads, they only need to place part of the content's text into the RSS feed. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
I completely agree that if an RSS feed is only syndicating summaries with a link through to the article on the website then no advert should be inserted into the feed. But many RSS feeds provide full posts/articles. I often go for weeks reading a website's content without ever visiting it, all through RSS. For those feeds advertising is needed to make it worthwhile. (Let us not get into the "Should you provide full-text or just summaries in your feeds?" discussion, please. :) ) regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
-
I completely agree that if an RSS feed is only syndicating summaries with a link through to the article on the website then no advert should be inserted into the feed. But many RSS feeds provide full posts/articles. I often go for weeks reading a website's content without ever visiting it, all through RSS. For those feeds advertising is needed to make it worthwhile. (Let us not get into the "Should you provide full-text or just summaries in your feeds?" discussion, please. :) ) regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
Paul Watson wrote: But many RSS feeds provide full posts/articles. I often go for weeks reading a website's content without ever visiting it, all through RSS. For those feeds advertising is needed to make it worthwhile. Me too, but if the content is important enough to me I'd prefer to pay for it rather than have adverts forced into my RSS feeds. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Paul Watson wrote: But many RSS feeds provide full posts/articles. I often go for weeks reading a website's content without ever visiting it, all through RSS. For those feeds advertising is needed to make it worthwhile. Me too, but if the content is important enough to me I'd prefer to pay for it rather than have adverts forced into my RSS feeds. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
Indeed, but it is good to have choice. Pay nothing and have ads in your feeds. Subscribe and have no ads in your feeds. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
-
Indeed, but it is good to have choice. Pay nothing and have ads in your feeds. Subscribe and have no ads in your feeds. regards, Paul Watson South Africa PMW Photography Gary Kirkham wrote: The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the cliché...Star Trek had it in spades.
Paul Watson wrote: Indeed, but it is good to have choice. Pay nothing and have ads in your feeds. Subscribe and have no ads in your feeds. If and when it happens, I hope that I have the choice to opt out of the ads for a subscription fee, Of course, I just noticed that the Unoffical Google web log current has a Google ad at the bottom of all their entries. So I guess that is RSS ads by the back-door. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. Why does everything in this world have to be polluted by ads! Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
IDIOTS! How dare they want to pay the power bill and place food on the table. I say keel haul the lot of them. I say let the live off the dole...;P "Art doesn't want to be familiar. It wants to astonish us. Or, in some cases, to enrage us. It wants to move us. To touch us. Not accommodate us, make us comfortable." -- Jamake Highwater Toasty0.com My Grandkids
-
Hopefully they are doing that so nobody will be able to put ads into RSS feeds. Why does everything in this world have to be polluted by ads! Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
because its a conspiracy of web sites to scam the advertisers, who really think millions of people REALLY read there adds on-line and actually THINK that millions of people ACTUALLY CLICK on those ads. i pitty the advertisers who really think their getting theirs $$ worth. AKA legalized mofia, legalized raccetering. :suss:
