Office 12 - shock or awe?
-
OpenOffice is so slow........ :sigh:
[ITA] Tozzi ha ragione: Gaia si sta liberando di noi. [ENG] Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us.
Isn't it Java-based? If so, then 'nuff said. :) Jeremy Falcon
-
Isn't it Java-based? If so, then 'nuff said. :) Jeremy Falcon
It's mostly C++ with some Java bits. It's all integrated through a networking interface. If you want to automate it, you have to open a port on your system. :-D
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
-
Well I would be curious to know what the ages/age groups are of the people who like or dislike the UI. I'm guessing that the folks who are a bit older (30+) and who've beening dealing with MS stuff for 10+ years will be less impressed with the UI. But that could be completely wrong too. For what it's worth, I'm over 30, and I think it looks ridiculous, for a variety of reasons: - too many damn colors - too many damn visual elements/styles, i.e. transparency, color gradients, 3D bevels, vertical gradients, horizontal gradients, ech. - tool bar buttons that look one way, vs. regualar buttons that look radically different - the stupid "glassy" look that while at first glance "looks" pretty, because it's a pretty effect, but I'm guessing just generally get's annoying over time, and because of the variety of colors involved (again the gradients, glowing highlight, etc) make the text harder to read. - visually it just makes me feel tired. The whole UI seems (again - I'd say Office 2003 falls under this as well) more to be driven by the developers saying "look at me - I can make gradients and fancy looking UI's" than any genuine benefit to the user. I cannot fathom my Mom and Dad being able to deal with this. Nor can I fathom your average computer user fealling at ease with the explosion of information presented to them. - poorly rendered icons - whats with the icons that look like they were designed for 16X16, then scaled up to 32X32 and then, to get rid of the horrid jaggies, had a gaussian blur filter run over them? Office 2003 has the same problem, it makes them hard to read and they just look like crap. With 60 billion in the bank can't MS hire graphic designer's to make clean, crisp icons? ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
Well, I am 44 and it looks interesting too me. While the icons could be a little more impressive, the overall is going to make for some fun play. That said though, I will have no clue how usable the new GUI is until I have my fat little fingers on and play a bit. Could be the new UI is nothing more than a pain, but I am always open for something new and fresh! Rocky <>< My Blog[^]
-
Oh, I don't know. It doesn't look too bad, actually. However, they should have gone the whole way and just made the screen look like one of those screen displays on STNG instead of a 21st century imitation. Marc My website Traceract Understanding Simple Data Binding Diary Of A CEO - Preface
-
And have the users buy touch screens to use them? :-D Or should that be holographic keyboards? Signature The only valid use of the BLINK tag:
Schrodinger's cat is not dead
.
Nah. Just skip to the TUI: Telepathic User Interface, also known by its guiding principle: "Do What I Meant, Not What I Said"
Software Zen:
delete this;