static library instance member scope
-
i have a question about scope of items in a static library. is it possible to give access to members of a class to functions within the library, but not functions in the application referencing the library (such as the 'internal' keyword in c#) without specifying 'friend' for every class i need to have access to it? sorry i worded that weird :laugh::laugh:
-
i have a question about scope of items in a static library. is it possible to give access to members of a class to functions within the library, but not functions in the application referencing the library (such as the 'internal' keyword in c#) without specifying 'friend' for every class i need to have access to it? sorry i worded that weird :laugh::laugh:
No, I don't think so. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
-
No, I don't think so. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
thanks it's hard moving from managed back to unmanaged:-D
-
thanks it's hard moving from managed back to unmanaged:-D
Yeah, I've moved from C# back to C++, and while I love it overall, there are definately things I notice are 'missing' ( although the same is true going the other way ) Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++