Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Office standards not open at all

Office standards not open at all

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
combusiness
12 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Paul Watson

    Microsoft can do whatever they want with their software IMO but it is sad that the open standards support of Office documents is a farce[^]. I guess they have their own business opinion on why they wont open up their documents but I just want to get on with creating documents I can use amongst different apps, send to anybody on any platform and with no lock-in worries. Seems a reasonable desire to me. Ah well, their app, their decision. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brian Delahunty
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    What is wrong with plain old text files.... oh yeah.. different EOL chars on most platforms.... :rolleyes: Regards, Brian Dela :-) Blog^ Co-author of The Outlook Answer Book... Go on, order^ it today!

    S P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      Microsoft can do whatever they want with their software IMO but it is sad that the open standards support of Office documents is a farce[^]. I guess they have their own business opinion on why they wont open up their documents but I just want to get on with creating documents I can use amongst different apps, send to anybody on any platform and with no lock-in worries. Seems a reasonable desire to me. Ah well, their app, their decision. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

      G Offline
      G Offline
      generic_user_id
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      It looks like this license is similar to the one of the often praised PDF format. You're allowed to write software that supports the format and the specs of the format are readily available, but extending the document is prohibited. At least this way you don't get incompatibilities between versions of the XML Office format. If everybody's allowed to write software that uses the format then lock-in is almost impossible. And if the specs are available the 3rd party software can be 100% compatible, which is a big improvement.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Brian Delahunty

        What is wrong with plain old text files.... oh yeah.. different EOL chars on most platforms.... :rolleyes: Regards, Brian Dela :-) Blog^ Co-author of The Outlook Answer Book... Go on, order^ it today!

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stephane Rodriguez
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Xml fixes that EOL thing, in addition to encodings. But to anybody looking to write a normal Word document why not stick to RTF? (each Windows OS comes with Wordpad in the accessories, which is just fine for that). The real trouble with the new Office 2006 file formats is that they are a departure from today's MS Office file formats anyway, so why not budget on migrating towards a cross-platform standard implementation instead. By the way, MS Office 2006 won't even install on Windows 2000 (or Windows XP, XP SP1). To end users, Office 2006 means a new file format hell to deal with. By making it even more graphics intensive (GDI+ is known to be slow), they are going to have people forced to upgrade their PCs. I have not a single doubt about where the Office documents are headed : be effectively optimized for a Windows Vista-only world. (even the Mac Office version is a casualty as exemplified by the Mac B.U. being part of the game division). Further, as I have said in several places, Microsoft wants you to believe that the file format war is over and that in the modern world file formats don't matter anymore. Unfortunately, they are showing everyday by adding their own extensions to everything that file formats don't matter as long as you are using theirs. In fact, the issue is not only about layout mismatch or about anyone willing to use their own declarative Xml to express Word documents, Excel spreadsheets and so on. It's that Microsoft is adding capabilities like collaboration which only works with say Sharepoint 2006 in a Windows-only world (both clients and servers). None of these protocols are publicly documented. Telling a lot about how shortsighted an initiative it can be.

        B N 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B Brian Delahunty

          What is wrong with plain old text files.... oh yeah.. different EOL chars on most platforms.... :rolleyes: Regards, Brian Dela :-) Blog^ Co-author of The Outlook Answer Book... Go on, order^ it today!

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Watson
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Ugh. EOL is what tripped me up a few times while setting Apache up on Lemon. Thankfulyl Notepad2 makes it easy to change. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stephane Rodriguez

            Xml fixes that EOL thing, in addition to encodings. But to anybody looking to write a normal Word document why not stick to RTF? (each Windows OS comes with Wordpad in the accessories, which is just fine for that). The real trouble with the new Office 2006 file formats is that they are a departure from today's MS Office file formats anyway, so why not budget on migrating towards a cross-platform standard implementation instead. By the way, MS Office 2006 won't even install on Windows 2000 (or Windows XP, XP SP1). To end users, Office 2006 means a new file format hell to deal with. By making it even more graphics intensive (GDI+ is known to be slow), they are going to have people forced to upgrade their PCs. I have not a single doubt about where the Office documents are headed : be effectively optimized for a Windows Vista-only world. (even the Mac Office version is a casualty as exemplified by the Mac B.U. being part of the game division). Further, as I have said in several places, Microsoft wants you to believe that the file format war is over and that in the modern world file formats don't matter anymore. Unfortunately, they are showing everyday by adding their own extensions to everything that file formats don't matter as long as you are using theirs. In fact, the issue is not only about layout mismatch or about anyone willing to use their own declarative Xml to express Word documents, Excel spreadsheets and so on. It's that Microsoft is adding capabilities like collaboration which only works with say Sharepoint 2006 in a Windows-only world (both clients and servers). None of these protocols are publicly documented. Telling a lot about how shortsighted an initiative it can be.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Brian Delahunty
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Stephane Rodriguez. wrote:

            Xml fixes that EOL thing, in addition to encodings.

            I was talking about viewing files. You write an XML file on windows using notepad (or whatever text editor you want) and it still gets Windows EOL chars. Open that xml file up on a MAC and the windows EOL chars are still there. So XML does not solve the problem (it's just text) until you bring XML parsers into the fray. Regards, Brian Dela :-) Blog^ Co-author of The Outlook Answer Book... Go on, order^ it today!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stephane Rodriguez

              Xml fixes that EOL thing, in addition to encodings. But to anybody looking to write a normal Word document why not stick to RTF? (each Windows OS comes with Wordpad in the accessories, which is just fine for that). The real trouble with the new Office 2006 file formats is that they are a departure from today's MS Office file formats anyway, so why not budget on migrating towards a cross-platform standard implementation instead. By the way, MS Office 2006 won't even install on Windows 2000 (or Windows XP, XP SP1). To end users, Office 2006 means a new file format hell to deal with. By making it even more graphics intensive (GDI+ is known to be slow), they are going to have people forced to upgrade their PCs. I have not a single doubt about where the Office documents are headed : be effectively optimized for a Windows Vista-only world. (even the Mac Office version is a casualty as exemplified by the Mac B.U. being part of the game division). Further, as I have said in several places, Microsoft wants you to believe that the file format war is over and that in the modern world file formats don't matter anymore. Unfortunately, they are showing everyday by adding their own extensions to everything that file formats don't matter as long as you are using theirs. In fact, the issue is not only about layout mismatch or about anyone willing to use their own declarative Xml to express Word documents, Excel spreadsheets and so on. It's that Microsoft is adding capabilities like collaboration which only works with say Sharepoint 2006 in a Windows-only world (both clients and servers). None of these protocols are publicly documented. Telling a lot about how shortsighted an initiative it can be.

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nish Nishant
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Hey Stephane Good to see you posting here again :-)

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Watson

                Microsoft can do whatever they want with their software IMO but it is sad that the open standards support of Office documents is a farce[^]. I guess they have their own business opinion on why they wont open up their documents but I just want to get on with creating documents I can use amongst different apps, send to anybody on any platform and with no lock-in worries. Seems a reasonable desire to me. Ah well, their app, their decision. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

                realJSOPR Offline
                realJSOPR Offline
                realJSOP
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Does that honestly surprise you at all? ------- sig starts "I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                  Does that honestly surprise you at all? ------- sig starts "I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Paul Watson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Not really but you know me, ever hopeful, always optimistic. Still, MS did release SSE under a Creative Commons license which was quite surprising. Either the devs snuck that one under the radar or there is a hidden motive. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    Ugh. EOL is what tripped me up a few times while setting Apache up on Lemon. Thankfulyl Notepad2 makes it easy to change. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    leppie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Paul Watson wrote:

                    Thankfulyl Notepad2 makes it easy to change.

                    xacc.ide needs no changing :) it defaults to \n and strips \r, but when saving it, the underlying streamwriter automatically appends depending on platform. xacc.ide-0.1 released! Download and screenshots

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L leppie

                      Paul Watson wrote:

                      Thankfulyl Notepad2 makes it easy to change.

                      xacc.ide needs no changing :) it defaults to \n and strips \r, but when saving it, the underlying streamwriter automatically appends depending on platform. xacc.ide-0.1 released! Download and screenshots

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      That is handy but see, I edit my apache2 config files in Windows and then fling em over to the Linux box. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nish Nishant

                        Hey Stephane Good to see you posting here again :-)

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stephane Rodriguez
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Ya know, I never miss an opportunity to throw a stab at Redmond. These days though, they seem to offer tons of such legitimate reasons to do so. Check out this bonner : http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2005/11/30/498288.aspx. That's ridiculous. -- modified at 11:31 Wednesday 30th November, 2005

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups