Yet Another Parody Web Site
-
That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme
-
That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme
Oh man. Somebody had *far* too much time on their hands
-
That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme
Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing
-
That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme
Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing
-
Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing
D'oh, sorry 'bout that. I'll post a "not work-safe" disclaimer in the future
-
D'oh, sorry 'bout that. I'll post a "not work-safe" disclaimer in the future
-
Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing
-
This is true but you're missing the point. Most text containing hyperlinks contains a description of what the link is for. In this case, the link's description didn't say much about it except that it was for those with "LD relationships". It said nothing about it containing sexual material, which to most (if not all) companies is highly objectionable. So what Jamie is asking for is just a warning message for any links that may be considered objectionable by corporate "big brothers". I don't think he personally had anything against the link itself but his superiors may have thought differently and he just didn't want to deal with such an issue. Personally, I agree with him. Regards, Alvaro