What Language

[Super Lloyd]

A tiny portion! But you can't escape some of it. Heck, even Singularity[^] has tiny portion of assembly code in it.

[shadrach_india]

I know Assembly language. But for compiling, I need assembler, what language is used for Assembler. :->

[code frog 0]

The Processor

---

"You have an arrow in your butt!" - Fiona:cool:
Welcome to CP in your language. Post the unicode version in My CP Blog [ ^ ] now.

People who don't understand how awesome Firefox is have never used CPhog[^]CPhog. The act of using CPhog (Firefox)[^] alone doesn't make Firefox cool. It opens your eyes to the possibilities and then you start looking for other things like CPhog (Firefox)[^] and your eyes are suddenly open to all sorts of useful things all through Firefox. - (Self Quote)

[darkelv]

Machine Language?

[Eytukan]

shadrach_india wrote:

what language is used for Assembler

:confused: Assembly!

---

--[:jig:]-- [My Current Status]

[Corinna John]

AFAIK OS developers use - C++ for the OS - Assembly Language for the C++ compiler - Machine language for the Assembler The machine language is coded into the processor and does not need a compiler...:rolleyes: _____________________________________________________________________________ I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.

[shadrach_india]

Is it correct :~ . May I believe this :->

[lmoelleb]

Take a look here[^].

[Roger Alsing 0]

>>If this is Y language, What language is used for Y compiler ..... well, since we have lots of nice languages today, you could very well create an assembler in ruby or c# (:~ ), they just have to parse the assembly code and spit out the machinecode for it. so today its not a problem the problem only existed for the first poor bastards that created the first compilers before there were anything else :-) so if someone was about to create a new platform, they wouldnt have this problem ,they would simply make an assembler on say windows/*nix that spits out machinecode for the new platform.. http://www.puzzleframework.com

[Kevin McFarlane]

shadrach_india wrote:

What language is used for developing OS (windows)?

Currently C, C++, Assembler. But for Vista, it's C, C++, Assembler, Managed C++ and C#. Kevin

[peterchen]

Not quite. The C++ compiler, of course, is written in C++. The first C++ translator was called CFront, it was originally written in C, and translated C++ sources to C, which in turn were fed to the C compiler. Same goes for the first C compiler, written in C, by intermediate translation to B (or BCPL?)

---

Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist

[Corinna John]

Things are even worse: C# and VB are coded in C++. Just imagine the compiler chain depth you'd get if you wrote a compiler in C#. _____________________________________________________________________________ I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.

[Corinna John]

Imagine that all compilers would disappear from all harddrives over night. Who would be able to write the first new compiler? :~ _____________________________________________________________________________ I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.

[Ryan Binns]

Me :cool:

Ryan

"Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

[shadrach_india]

Thanks a lot

[Lost User]

C is used for windows. the space shuttle too. C is used for everything. (or C++ which is a superset of C). Compilers, OS, the lot. Only very small parts of the HAL (hardware abstraction layer in the kernel) are written in assembler. Nunc est bibendum

[Lost User]

Corinna John wrote:

Just imagine the compiler chain depth you'd get if you wrote a compiler in C#

Stop it, I feel sick enough already. Nunc est bibendum

[Lost User]

Compilers arent difficult conceptualy, it is the text parsing that is just painful to write because it has to do so much syntax checking. Once the text is tokenised, translating it to assembly is easier. Nunc est bibendum

[JCParker]

Great Stuff, granular control, no security hang ups Ever see a processor flame, this is the language to create that program.

[Andy Brummer]

You forgot Plain English and Plain English. ;P

---

I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon