Look Who Has Been Captured!
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Two wrongs might not make a right, but I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it.
You would make a fine, albeit infinitesimal, cog in a fascist machinery. Triumph of the will, eh? -- Not Y3K Compliant
Last modified: den 22 juli 2006 12:48:46 --
Yeah, sure, wanting the side to win that advocates and defends freedom of expression even when it is contrary to the pervading national will makes someone a Nazi. Good catch... :rolleyes:
Thank God for disproportional force.
-- modified at 15:26 Saturday 22nd July, 2006
-
I very much presume that no articles by any muslim would be appearing in any jewish newspaper/periodical.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Two wrongs might not make a right, but I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it.
I wonder if Hanoi said similar before forcing USA out of Vietnam
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
before forcing USA out of Vietnam
Yeah, they forced us out by losing virtually every single engagement with us and getting their troops slaughtered wholesale. Good tactic, but I think they do owe a huge debt of gratitude to John Kerry, et al - just as Islamic extremist will owe you if they finally triumph. They'll probably repay you by giving you an extra comfy blanket to kneel on as you bow and scrape to Mecca.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-- modified at 15:31 Saturday 22nd July, 2006
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
before forcing USA out of Vietnam
Yeah, they forced us out by losing virtually every single engagement with us and getting their troops slaughtered wholesale. Good tactic, but I think they do owe a huge debt of gratitude to John Kerry, et al - just as Islamic extremist will owe you if they finally triumph. They'll probably repay you by giving you an extra comfy blanket to kneel on as you bow and scrape to Mecca.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-- modified at 15:31 Saturday 22nd July, 2006
Stan Shannon wrote:
Yeah, they forced us out by losing virtually every single engagement with us and getting their troops slaughtered wholesale.
Can I take that as (paraphrasing you) "Israel being forced out of Lebanon by Hizbullah losing virtually every single engagement with Isreal and getting their troops (sorry - terrorists) slaughtered wholesale." Get real !!!!
Stan Shannon wrote:
Thank God for disproportional force.
Still I feel this signature is inappropriate.
-
Yeah, sure, wanting the side to win that advocates and defends freedom of expression even when it is contrary to the pervading national will makes someone a Nazi. Good catch... :rolleyes:
Thank God for disproportional force.
-- modified at 15:26 Saturday 22nd July, 2006
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
freedom of expression
All nations of the Middle East are guilty to some extent of denying this, including Israel.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
All nations of the Middle East are guilty to some extent of denying this, including Israel.
Well, than, its too bad they didn't deny it for the ignorant fuck wad who wrote this article.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Yeah, they forced us out by losing virtually every single engagement with us and getting their troops slaughtered wholesale.
Can I take that as (paraphrasing you) "Israel being forced out of Lebanon by Hizbullah losing virtually every single engagement with Isreal and getting their troops (sorry - terrorists) slaughtered wholesale." Get real !!!!
Stan Shannon wrote:
Thank God for disproportional force.
Still I feel this signature is inappropriate.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Can I take that as (paraphrasing you) "Israel being forced out of Lebanon by Hizbullah losing virtually every single engagement with Isreal and getting their troops (sorry - terrorists) slaughtered wholesale."
Israel left of its own accord, in good faith to agreements that no one else has respected.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Still I feel this signature is inappropriate.
I know you do. Thats why its there. Without disproportional force neither of us would even be having this conversation. Its the primary reason we've been defeating evil for quite some time now.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
All nations of the Middle East are guilty to some extent of denying this, including Israel.
Well, than, its too bad they didn't deny it for the ignorant fuck wad who wrote this article.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Can I take that as (paraphrasing you) "Israel being forced out of Lebanon by Hizbullah losing virtually every single engagement with Isreal and getting their troops (sorry - terrorists) slaughtered wholesale."
Israel left of its own accord, in good faith to agreements that no one else has respected.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Still I feel this signature is inappropriate.
I know you do. Thats why its there. Without disproportional force neither of us would even be having this conversation. Its the primary reason we've been defeating evil for quite some time now.
Thank God for disproportional force.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Israel left of its own accord, in good faith to agreements that no one else has respected
Which particulars of such agreements have not been fulfilled, and would the non-jews agree your point(s). And would the non-jews agree that Isreal is "whiter than white" in respect to these agreements - I suspect not and I expect others reading this would probably inform you of such details.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Its the primary reason we've been defeating evil for quite some time now
And replacing with a "holier than thou" attitute that neither wins anybody's friendship nor promotes harmony where disharmony exists.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
True, but when justice fails to be served, acceptance or vengeance are the only options left. Guess which one most people opt for?
You should read Hamlet...
"The key, the whole key, and nothing but the key, so help me Codd"
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Well, than, its too bad they didn't deny it for the ignorant f*** wad who wrote this article
Have I touched a nerve X|
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Have I touched a nerve
Nah, I thouhgt he was an ignorant fuck wad before you even showed up.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Have I touched a nerve
Nah, I thouhgt he was an ignorant fuck wad before you even showed up.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Israel left of its own accord, in good faith to agreements that no one else has respected
Which particulars of such agreements have not been fulfilled, and would the non-jews agree your point(s). And would the non-jews agree that Isreal is "whiter than white" in respect to these agreements - I suspect not and I expect others reading this would probably inform you of such details.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Its the primary reason we've been defeating evil for quite some time now
And replacing with a "holier than thou" attitute that neither wins anybody's friendship nor promotes harmony where disharmony exists.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
And replacing with a "holier than thou" attitute that neither wins anybody's friendship nor promotes harmony where disharmony exists.
Unlike you guilt ridden, appeasers, I don't hold myself to any higher standards of winning friends or promoting harmony than I do anyone else. Its what we like to call a 'two way street' down here at the trailer park.
Thank God for disproportional force.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
And replacing with a "holier than thou" attitute that neither wins anybody's friendship nor promotes harmony where disharmony exists.
Unlike you guilt ridden, appeasers, I don't hold myself to any higher standards of winning friends or promoting harmony than I do anyone else. Its what we like to call a 'two way street' down here at the trailer park.
Thank God for disproportional force.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Unlike you guilt ridden, appeasers, I don't hold myself to any higher standards of winning friends or promoting harmony than I do anyone else.
The fact that it's the same for yourself as for everyone else, doesn't make it any better - it's still a dirt-low standard.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Its what we like to call a 'two way street' down here at the trailer park.
Do you really live in a trailer park, or do you refer to "the trailer park" for the effect? :laugh:
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
And replacing with a "holier than thou" attitute that neither wins anybody's friendship nor promotes harmony where disharmony exists.
Unlike you guilt ridden, appeasers, I don't hold myself to any higher standards of winning friends or promoting harmony than I do anyone else. Its what we like to call a 'two way street' down here at the trailer park.
Thank God for disproportional force.
Arguments and disagreements I can handle. It is just a simple matter of discussing whatever the issue is in an atmosphere of mutual respect insofar that if an argument or disagreement cannot be resolved to everybody's satisfaction then the only proper, correct and honourable thing to do is to agree to disagree, and perhaps return to the issue at a later time in the expectation of finding a mutual solution. That is not my idea of " guilt ridden and appeasers ". Do you not prefer harmony to disharmony, if so, perhaps you might like to give me valid reasons.
-
Only an idiot pokes a dog with a stick repeatedly, then complains when the dog bites him.
Rob Graham wrote:
Only an idiot pokes a dog with a stick repeatedly, then complains when the dog bites him.
:confused: Are the Israelis the idiots because they seek to expand the settlements, imprison and torture Palestinians on suspicion of wrongdoing, and refuse the return of Palestinians - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Palestinians capture an Israeli soldier? Or are the Palestinians the idiots because they support and encourage suicide bombings, deny Israel's right to existence, and refuse to compromise - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Israelis retaliate against the Palestinians? Or both simulataneously?
----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Only an idiot pokes a dog with a stick repeatedly, then complains when the dog bites him.
:confused: Are the Israelis the idiots because they seek to expand the settlements, imprison and torture Palestinians on suspicion of wrongdoing, and refuse the return of Palestinians - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Palestinians capture an Israeli soldier? Or are the Palestinians the idiots because they support and encourage suicide bombings, deny Israel's right to existence, and refuse to compromise - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Israelis retaliate against the Palestinians? Or both simulataneously?
----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
-
Brit wrote:
Or both simulataneously?
That one
"The trouble with jogging is that the ice falls out of your glass." - Martin Mull
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Only an idiot pokes a dog with a stick repeatedly, then complains when the dog bites him.
:confused: Are the Israelis the idiots because they seek to expand the settlements, imprison and torture Palestinians on suspicion of wrongdoing, and refuse the return of Palestinians - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Palestinians capture an Israeli soldier? Or are the Palestinians the idiots because they support and encourage suicide bombings, deny Israel's right to existence, and refuse to compromise - therefore, they shouldn't complain when the Israelis retaliate against the Palestinians? Or both simulataneously?
----------------------------------------------------- Empires Of Steel[^]
There is sufficient idiocy on both sides to suffice. Hamas and there erstwhile allies Hezbolla and the lot, however stand out for their persistant unwillingness to live with their neighbor. In this case, the palestinians are most at fault for provoking the dog at a time when the dog was trying to disangage. Both of the above are more interested in fighting with and possibly killing the dog than they are in peaceful co-existance.
-
Blame Hezbollah. They got precisely what they wanted, at the expense of the rest of the Lebanese people. They knew what the results could be, and provoked anyway. I have zero sympathy for them. As for the rest of Lebanon, perhaps they should rethink harboring Hezbollah, since hezbolla clearly has no concern for the welfare of Lebanon, or they would not have provoked (and continue to provoke) attack.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Unlike you guilt ridden, appeasers, I don't hold myself to any higher standards of winning friends or promoting harmony than I do anyone else.
The fact that it's the same for yourself as for everyone else, doesn't make it any better - it's still a dirt-low standard.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Its what we like to call a 'two way street' down here at the trailer park.
Do you really live in a trailer park, or do you refer to "the trailer park" for the effect? :laugh:
J. Dunlap wrote:
The fact that it's the same for yourself as for everyone else, doesn't make it any better - it's still a dirt-low standard.
When you get promoted to the status of a divinity, I'll consider paying attention to your notion of standards.
J. Dunlap wrote:
Do you really live in a trailer park, or do you refer to "the trailer park" for the effect?
Nah, I live in a nice house in the country. But, when I was growing up, my mother's greatest hope was to be able to move out of our little shack and into one of the trailers in the trailer park across the street - that is, our big dream was to be rich enough some day to be considred trailer trash. Most of my kinfolk remain trailer trash, or worse, so I'm more than a little familiar with that particular cultural milieu. (BTW, if you ever visit a trailer park, don't use phrases like 'cultural milieu' cause somebody'l fuck'n shoot your ass. Its ok to say 'kinfolk' though)
Thank God for disproportional force.