Crime is Bush's fault
-
espeir wrote:
Ummmm...The left actually did lead us into that war. Conservatives (Nixon) withdrew.
I bet this will be voted down very soon. The truth hurts. :)
A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. - Sigmund Freud
Score: 1.0 (3 votes). wrote:
I bet this will be voted down very soon. The truth hurts.
What truth? Who is claiming that the right took us to war? Johnson is responsible for escalating the conflict. Kennedy might have ended it, had he lived. Bush got us into Iraq, somebody from some party will get us out. Who started the war has no bearing on its morality or justification. The point I was making had nothing to do with right and left, and everything to do with right and wrong. That is the aspect of the war that contributed to the disillusionment of the sixties.
-
espeir wrote:
I would think
Your thoughts are of little import, motoring offences are NOT criminal offences.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
In Arizona, 20mph above the posted limit becomes a 'criminal' violation as opposed to a 'civil' or 'moving' violation.
-
espeir wrote:
Ummmm...The left actually did lead us into that war. Conservatives (Nixon) withdrew.
Congratulations on an as yet unbroken string of points missed.
You're constantly trying to excuse your idiocy by saying that. But it only digs you deeper into your own hole.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I don't have time to recap my reading for your benefit. Google "surveillance displaces crime". Consider British police officer Wesley Sharp's point: "Certainly the crime goes somewhere. I don’t believe that just because you’ve got cameras in a city centre that everyone says ’Oh well, we’re going to give up crime and get a job.’"
Done. And I see nothing except for blog references claiming "numerous studies have shown" but no actualy studies. However, the Department of Justice [^] states: "On the other hand, the growth in CCTV installations demonstrates a general consensus that the presence of cameras seems to deter crime. Moreover, so far no one has been able to prove definitively that the use of cameras in one area displaces crime to neighboring areas."
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Reducing everything to morality, and insisting that church -- your church -- is the sole arbiter of morality, is very simple-minded.
Why? You claim that your church's morality is superior to mine. Only I have to conform to your church whereas you do not have to conform to mine. Anyway, not everything is reduced to morality, but that (crime) is the topic of discussion. Immoral people do commit crime. Immoral people do not. Educated people do commit crime, however.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Guess you would find the primate house creepy. Lower primates looking out, higher primates looking in, and you in the middle providing unwilling, but nonetheless compelling evidence for the theory of evolution.
I guess I see how you could find the creepiness of hanging out at grade schools inexplicable.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45
espeir wrote:
Done. And I see nothing except for blog references claiming "numerous studies have shown" but no actualy studies. However, the Department of Justice [^] states: "On the other hand, the growth in CCTV installations demonstrates a general consensus that the presence of cameras seems to deter crime. Moreover, so far no one has been able to prove definitively that the use of cameras in one area displaces crime to neighboring areas."
Feel free to install a PDF viewer and dig away. Or visit your local library or bookstore. Also, feel free to rebut common sense. Do you actually believe that police presence reforms criminals?
espeir wrote:
Why? You claim that your church's morality is superior to mine. Only I have to conform to your church whereas you do not have to conform to mine. Anyway, not everything is reduced to morality, but that (crime) is the topic of discussion. Immoral people do commit crime. Immoral people do not. Educated people do commit crime, however.
My church? Which church would that be? Oh, that's right, you see every school of thought as a church, and the world as a system of competing churches. How very...religious of you. Moral people do not commit crime? What do you mean by "moral person"? What are the requirements? Do moral people commit sin?
-
You're constantly trying to excuse your idiocy by saying that. But it only digs you deeper into your own hole.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
You insist on arguing political issues on their morality, and issues of morality, on their politics. That was my point. You missed it. Again. You should just learn to live with your shortcomings, monkey boy.
-
espeir wrote:
Link?
I don't have time to recap my reading for your benefit. Google "surveillance displaces crime". Consider British police officer Wesley Sharp's point: "Certainly the crime goes somewhere. I don’t believe that just because you’ve got cameras in a city centre that everyone says ’Oh well, we’re going to give up crime and get a job.’"
espeir wrote:
This goes back to the dichotomy between the rich and poor. You can make a much better living today than 200 years ago being uneducated in either case. However, today an XBox is perceived as a necessity and if you don't have what the entitlement culture promises, then you go out and take it. That factor can be eliminated, but morality cannot.
Reducing everything to morality, and insisting that church -- your church -- is the sole arbiter of morality, is very simple-minded.
espeir wrote:
So that's where you like to hang out? I must admit that it's a creepy.
Guess you would find the primate house creepy. Lower primates looking out, higher primates looking in, and you in the middle providing unwilling, but nonetheless compelling evidence for the theory of evolution.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Guess you would find the primate house creepy. Lower primates looking out, higher primates looking in, and you in the middle providing unwilling, but nonetheless compelling evidence for the theory of evolution.
Lovely. :laugh: And so true.
The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.
-
espeir wrote:
Done. And I see nothing except for blog references claiming "numerous studies have shown" but no actualy studies. However, the Department of Justice [^] states: "On the other hand, the growth in CCTV installations demonstrates a general consensus that the presence of cameras seems to deter crime. Moreover, so far no one has been able to prove definitively that the use of cameras in one area displaces crime to neighboring areas."
Feel free to install a PDF viewer and dig away. Or visit your local library or bookstore. Also, feel free to rebut common sense. Do you actually believe that police presence reforms criminals?
espeir wrote:
Why? You claim that your church's morality is superior to mine. Only I have to conform to your church whereas you do not have to conform to mine. Anyway, not everything is reduced to morality, but that (crime) is the topic of discussion. Immoral people do commit crime. Immoral people do not. Educated people do commit crime, however.
My church? Which church would that be? Oh, that's right, you see every school of thought as a church, and the world as a system of competing churches. How very...religious of you. Moral people do not commit crime? What do you mean by "moral person"? What are the requirements? Do moral people commit sin?
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Feel free to install a PDF viewer and dig away. Or visit your local library or bookstore. Also, feel free to rebut common sense. Do you actually believe that police presence reforms criminals?
:rolleyes: So basically you couldn't find anything to back up your made up claim on Google so now you saying I need to visit a bookstore. Riiiiight. And I didn't say that a police presence reforms criminals. In fact I said the opposite. I said that it takes an overwhelming presence of police to prevent crime because criminals have to feel as though someone is watching them.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
My church? Which church would that be? Oh, that's right, you see every school of thought as a church, and the world as a system of competing churches. How very...religious of you. Moral people do not commit crime? What do you mean by "moral person"? What are the requirements? Do moral people commit sin?
The Church of Totalitarian Atheism.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
-
You insist on arguing political issues on their morality, and issues of morality, on their politics. That was my point. You missed it. Again. You should just learn to live with your shortcomings, monkey boy.
Who can blame me? Now matter how I look at it, I can't see how anybody could construe what you said in that way. I'm guessing you realized how stupid a remark it was and you're too proud to admit your stupidity. Don't worry...we already know.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Feel free to install a PDF viewer and dig away. Or visit your local library or bookstore. Also, feel free to rebut common sense. Do you actually believe that police presence reforms criminals?
:rolleyes: So basically you couldn't find anything to back up your made up claim on Google so now you saying I need to visit a bookstore. Riiiiight. And I didn't say that a police presence reforms criminals. In fact I said the opposite. I said that it takes an overwhelming presence of police to prevent crime because criminals have to feel as though someone is watching them.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
My church? Which church would that be? Oh, that's right, you see every school of thought as a church, and the world as a system of competing churches. How very...religious of you. Moral people do not commit crime? What do you mean by "moral person"? What are the requirements? Do moral people commit sin?
The Church of Totalitarian Atheism.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
espeir wrote:
I said that it takes an overwhelming presence of police to prevent crime because criminals have to feel as though someone is watching them.
No, you said that police presence does not displace crime. That's the assertion that both common sense and formal studies refute.
espeir wrote:
The Church of Totalitarian Atheism.
So, in other words, you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
-
espeir wrote:
I said that it takes an overwhelming presence of police to prevent crime because criminals have to feel as though someone is watching them.
No, you said that police presence does not displace crime. That's the assertion that both common sense and formal studies refute.
espeir wrote:
The Church of Totalitarian Atheism.
So, in other words, you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
No, you said that police presence does not displace crime. That's the assertion that both common sense and formal studies refute.
I said overwhelming police presence reduces crime, which common sense and DOJ studies support.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
So, in other words, you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
I'm not attempting to define a "moral person" here as that's a large topic and separate topic. I'm just addressing your error of the day. However, suffice it to say that immorality is the cause of crime.
-- modified at 16:17 Monday 21st August, 2006
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
-
I think Libertarians have somewhat diversified their stance to something that resembles compulsory anarchy. However, if you go back to the earlier days of the Libertarian Party, legalizing pot was their primary platform. I saw a live political debate for a local office when I was 18 or so and the Libertarian candidate literally reframed every issue into pot. It was pretty funny.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
espeir wrote:
compulsory anarchy
I hear they also enjoy eating jumbo shrimp, perusing military intelligence, and listening to Democratic leadership, while using Microsoft Works.
-
espeir wrote:
compulsory anarchy
I hear they also enjoy eating jumbo shrimp, perusing military intelligence, and listening to Democratic leadership, while using Microsoft Works.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I hear they also enjoy eating jumbo shrimp
Probably, since they usually have the munchies.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
No, you said that police presence does not displace crime. That's the assertion that both common sense and formal studies refute.
I said overwhelming police presence reduces crime, which common sense and DOJ studies support.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
So, in other words, you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
I'm not attempting to define a "moral person" here as that's a large topic and separate topic. I'm just addressing your error of the day. However, suffice it to say that immorality is the cause of crime.
-- modified at 16:17 Monday 21st August, 2006
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
espeir wrote:
I said overwhelming police presence reduces crime, which common sense and DOJ studies support.
I originally said that police presence reduces crime partly by displacing it, which is why it is not a viable long-term solution. You disputed that fact.
espeir wrote:
I'm not attempting to define a "moral person" here as that's a large topic and separate topic.
Of course you're not going to define it. Making arguments based on terms with ill-defined or arbitrary definitions is the foundation of most of your arguments. Also, it would expose your assertion as the same tired, arbitrary, irrational and therefore logically indefensible crap that has been trotted out by the Inquisition, the Moral Majority, and every group in between with a burning (no pun intended) desire to impose their religion on an unwilling populous.
-
Who can blame me? Now matter how I look at it, I can't see how anybody could construe what you said in that way. I'm guessing you realized how stupid a remark it was and you're too proud to admit your stupidity. Don't worry...we already know.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
Ah, yes, thread context. I'll have to keep in mind the fact that you have the short-term memory of a goldfish, rendering you unable to mentally reference more than one post back in a thread, and adjust accordingly.
-
espeir wrote:
I said that it takes an overwhelming presence of police to prevent crime because criminals have to feel as though someone is watching them.
No, you said that police presence does not displace crime. That's the assertion that both common sense and formal studies refute.
espeir wrote:
The Church of Totalitarian Atheism.
So, in other words, you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
you admit that you can't define "moral person", or you are afraid that by doing so, you will have to face the gaping holes in your "logic".
As well as gaping holes in his morality.
The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.
-
link[^] As is always the case, the mainstream media has adopted the Democratic pre-election platform:
The slaying of the 20-year-old mother -- on a narrow street behind a police
station in Boston's poor Roxbury district last month -- is one of the shocking
examples of a rise in the murder rate across the United States that is raising
questions about whether police are fighting terrorism at the expense of
crime.It goes on to further blame Bush for fewer cops on the street...as if that's the federal government's role. But beyond the obvious political slant of this article, when did the presence of police become the deterrent for crime? Why would police be a deterrent, but the possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens cause crime (as also suggested)? If you ask me, crime is simply the result of bad people. Poverty does not necessarily breed crime, as there are numerous honest poor people. Guns don't breed crime as there are numerous guns held by law abiding people. The presence of police only deters crime when the criminal-to-be fears their immediate presence (and will commit a crime when the opportunity arises). Interestingly enough, if you look at American murder statistics, there's a pivot points in the late 1960's. Before then murder rates were consistently very low and afterwards they were high. I'm sure it's more than coincidence that this point in US history marked the rapid increase in divorce, abortion and moral permisiveness.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
espeir wrote:
Poverty does not necessarily breed crime, as there are numerous honest poor people.
While it is correct that poverty does not necessarily cause crime most people would agree that as poverty increases in a population of people so does the crime rate in that same population.
espeir wrote:
Guns don't breed crime as there are numerous guns held by law abiding people.
Again, perfectly true. But it's not the "law abiding people" with guns that are the problem. Obviously guns are not the cause of crime but they can make a bad situation worse. They can also act as a catalyst by emboldening the potential criminal; some may think twice about robbing a 7-11 if they have to wrestle the money from the cashier but a gun makes it all too easy and also makes the potential consequences when something goes wrong much, much worse.
Steve
-
link[^] As is always the case, the mainstream media has adopted the Democratic pre-election platform:
The slaying of the 20-year-old mother -- on a narrow street behind a police
station in Boston's poor Roxbury district last month -- is one of the shocking
examples of a rise in the murder rate across the United States that is raising
questions about whether police are fighting terrorism at the expense of
crime.It goes on to further blame Bush for fewer cops on the street...as if that's the federal government's role. But beyond the obvious political slant of this article, when did the presence of police become the deterrent for crime? Why would police be a deterrent, but the possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens cause crime (as also suggested)? If you ask me, crime is simply the result of bad people. Poverty does not necessarily breed crime, as there are numerous honest poor people. Guns don't breed crime as there are numerous guns held by law abiding people. The presence of police only deters crime when the criminal-to-be fears their immediate presence (and will commit a crime when the opportunity arises). Interestingly enough, if you look at American murder statistics, there's a pivot points in the late 1960's. Before then murder rates were consistently very low and afterwards they were high. I'm sure it's more than coincidence that this point in US history marked the rapid increase in divorce, abortion and moral permisiveness.
"I curse economic prosperity as it puts an end to much-needed poverty, famine and pestilence." -dennisd45 "I fully support Communists in key positions of our government. I believe that they contribute positively to the liberal ideal." -dennisd45 "Liberals do not exist. You invented them to facilitate your strawman arguments." -dennisd45 "The Communist Manifest was written 150 years ago. It has been rigorously tested and is accepted by left"
All I know that Bush himself is Bush's fault.
Oh Fisticuffs, I Need Your Approval For I Am Misguided Without Your Awesome Insight Please Validate My Existence With You're Internet Powers By Pumpkinhead, Age 15 or something
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX ba
-
All I know that Bush himself is Bush's fault.
Oh Fisticuffs, I Need Your Approval For I Am Misguided Without Your Awesome Insight Please Validate My Existence With You're Internet Powers By Pumpkinhead, Age 15 or something
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX ba
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
All I know that Bush himself is Bush's fault.
And Adnan is Adnan's fault or are you going to push that responsibility off on your repressive society?
The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.
you silly creature,one bush is Bush senior.You dont need to show your "class" in every post.
Oh Fisticuffs, I Need Your Approval For I Am Misguided Without Your Awesome Insight Please Validate My Existence With You're Internet Powers By Pumpkinhead, Age 15 or something
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX ba
-
you silly creature,one bush is Bush senior.You dont need to show your "class" in every post.
Oh Fisticuffs, I Need Your Approval For I Am Misguided Without Your Awesome Insight Please Validate My Existence With You're Internet Powers By Pumpkinhead, Age 15 or something
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX ba
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
you silly creature,one bush is Bush senior.You dont need to show your "class" in every post.
Dense as usual, are you? You wouldn't know class if it jumped up and bit you.
The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance.