Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Poor SAPrefsDialog

Poor SAPrefsDialog

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
designcomgraphicsarchitecturequestion
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mustafa Demirhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Chris Losinger wrote: this article was rated a solid 4.9 for the first 2 years it was here. everyone loved it. it was happy. life was good in River City. now it's a magnet for controversy, an argument attractor. it's been soiled, defiled, tarnished, besmirched, sullyied, smeared, stained and tainted MW; voted down for political reasons. it's good name ruined by the petty bickering of those who wish it harm. and why? because it was too good, too considerate, too free? why? oh my sweet SAPrefsDialog, what have i done? have i brought shame upon your good heart? have i ruined your kind soul? and for what? so that the ungrateful could use you in their mongrel applications, surround you with horrible UI, inefficient algorithms, poor design and careless use of bitmap buttons? alas, it is all my fault. I got this from http://www.codeproject.com/property/saprefs.asp#xx124246xx Hey Chris, this is really the funniest thing that I have read since a looong time. :laugh: You are not only an excellent programmer, but also an excellent poet! Go Chris go! ;) Mustafa Demirhan http://www.macroangel.com Sonork ID 100.9935:zoltrix

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mustafa Demirhan

      Chris Losinger wrote: this article was rated a solid 4.9 for the first 2 years it was here. everyone loved it. it was happy. life was good in River City. now it's a magnet for controversy, an argument attractor. it's been soiled, defiled, tarnished, besmirched, sullyied, smeared, stained and tainted MW; voted down for political reasons. it's good name ruined by the petty bickering of those who wish it harm. and why? because it was too good, too considerate, too free? why? oh my sweet SAPrefsDialog, what have i done? have i brought shame upon your good heart? have i ruined your kind soul? and for what? so that the ungrateful could use you in their mongrel applications, surround you with horrible UI, inefficient algorithms, poor design and careless use of bitmap buttons? alas, it is all my fault. I got this from http://www.codeproject.com/property/saprefs.asp#xx124246xx Hey Chris, this is really the funniest thing that I have read since a looong time. :laugh: You are not only an excellent programmer, but also an excellent poet! Go Chris go! ;) Mustafa Demirhan http://www.macroangel.com Sonork ID 100.9935:zoltrix

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      That's why I say look at the sum of rates. "454 points" looks pretty impressive still, be there a Sergio or not...


      the programmers just set it so that when in doubt, the women still think they're involved with you. It's much less frustrating that way - BGII Quest Directory

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups