Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. XP Add/Remove Programs [modified]

XP Add/Remove Programs [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpgame-devwindows-adminlinuxhardware
23 Posts 15 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR realJSOP

    He did admit that he installed a drive of questionable stability (a 2nd drive - 40gb), and that he had to re-partition/format it. I'll look at that tonight.

    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
    -----
    "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

    E Offline
    E Offline
    El Corazon
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

    He did admit that he installed a drive of questionable stability (a 2nd drive - 40gb),

    benchmark it even if it doesn't show errors in the log. grab one of the many disk benchmarks and just test the throughput. I have had old drives test in the single digits mb/s but not produce errors... they make good paperweights.

    _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Brigg Thorp

      Was this an upgrade to Windows 98 or ME? I have seen this happen if you upgrade these old 16 bit OS'es. Also, if this was an upgrade, and not a fresh install, spyware, malware and any other type of "ware" can really screws systems up. This may be occurring as a result of some rogue program. Regards,

      Brigg Thorp Senior Software Engineer Timex Corporation

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RoswellNX
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Brigg Thorp wrote:

      Was this an upgrade to Windows 98 or ME? I have seen this happen if you upgrade these old 16 bit OS'es.

      16-bit? really? i'm assuming you meant 95...but then i doubt the upgrade would work on that anyway. Roswell

      "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
      Antonio VillaRaigosa
      City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • realJSOPR realJSOP

        He's using the machine with the administrator account, and since this is a brand new install, there shouldn't be any orphans/registry defragging/disk defragging necessary. The machine has only been alive for a couple of weeks.

        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
        -----
        "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

        R Offline
        R Offline
        RoswellNX
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

        He's using the machine with the administrator account, and since this is a brand new install, there shouldn't be any orphans/registry defragging/disk defragging necessary. The machine has only been alive for a couple of weeks.

        yes, you do need to defrag after a reinstall when all of the software is up :). You first need to reboot, then run disk cleanup and remove all the temp files that the setup-ware has left. Then you run defrag and you'll see that there's already some fragmentation or files sitting in clusters now. It might tell you that you don't need to defrag, but go ahead anyway and you'll see the difference. But it's not that unusual to take 20 minutes for the list to populate. It does that when it has to check and double-check everything, but the next time it should only take about 3 minutes... Roswell :)

        "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
        Antonio VillaRaigosa
        City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups