Just noticed this on my unofficial transcript...
-
Upper Division Summary - Not Complete (UC trfr not calculated in audit GPA)
20.0 ATTEMPTED HOURS 62.8 POINTS 3.14 GPAThe important part here is that my upper division GPA, as of last quarter...is PI. I'm more proud of that than I would be of a 4.0. ;P
-
Upper Division Summary - Not Complete (UC trfr not calculated in audit GPA)
20.0 ATTEMPTED HOURS 62.8 POINTS 3.14 GPAThe important part here is that my upper division GPA, as of last quarter...is PI. I'm more proud of that than I would be of a 4.0. ;P
There is (or rather, WAS) this marketing campaing like thing, the vanishing point game. part of the last CES. Anyways, there were clues from a woman whose name was Loki or somthing i think. in her bio, she said her GPA was exactly 3.14, or PI. "That's harder to achieve than you might think" i think e=thats a word-for-word quote. heh. you sure youre not her? I'm starting to doubt youre a guy after such a similarity. heh.
:badger:
-
Upper Division Summary - Not Complete (UC trfr not calculated in audit GPA)
20.0 ATTEMPTED HOURS 62.8 POINTS 3.14 GPAThe important part here is that my upper division GPA, as of last quarter...is PI. I'm more proud of that than I would be of a 4.0. ;P
Have no Idea what you're on about, but glad you're proud of yourself
Kind Regards, Gary
My Website || My Blog || My Articles
-
Have no Idea what you're on about, but glad you're proud of yourself
Kind Regards, Gary
My Website || My Blog || My Articles
David Stone wrote:
Upper Division Summary - Not Complete (UC trfr not calculated in audit GPA) 20.0 ATTEMPTED HOURS 62.8 POINTS 3.14 GPA
:badger:
-
Have no Idea what you're on about, but glad you're proud of yourself
Kind Regards, Gary
My Website || My Blog || My Articles
-
There is (or rather, WAS) this marketing campaing like thing, the vanishing point game. part of the last CES. Anyways, there were clues from a woman whose name was Loki or somthing i think. in her bio, she said her GPA was exactly 3.14, or PI. "That's harder to achieve than you might think" i think e=thats a word-for-word quote. heh. you sure youre not her? I'm starting to doubt youre a guy after such a similarity. heh.
:badger:
Anton Afanasyev wrote:
she said her GPA was exactly 3.14, or PI.
Which is where the masses will now think that PI is exactly 3.14. Yet another example of media dumbing down the small folk. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
Anton Afanasyev wrote:
she said her GPA was exactly 3.14, or PI.
Which is where the masses will now think that PI is exactly 3.14. Yet another example of media dumbing down the small folk. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithI'm a math major, so I obviously realize that 3.14 is a horrible approximation for pi. ;)
-
Upper Division Summary - Not Complete (UC trfr not calculated in audit GPA)
20.0 ATTEMPTED HOURS 62.8 POINTS 3.14 GPAThe important part here is that my upper division GPA, as of last quarter...is PI. I'm more proud of that than I would be of a 4.0. ;P
2.0 GPA is "C" and 2.5 GPA is "C+" try going for 2.75 which should be "C++" :rolleyes: Steve
-
2.0 GPA is "C" and 2.5 GPA is "C+" try going for 2.75 which should be "C++" :rolleyes: Steve
That sounds like a grad school argument for not repeating a 6000 level class.
File Not Found