Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. J# finally bites the dust

J# finally bites the dust

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
26 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Kevin McFarlane

    http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Michael Dunn
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    A sad day for the three people still using J#... :-O

    --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ Ford, what's this fish doing in my ear?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Kevin McFarlane

      http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rocky Moore
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      That is amazing to me. I would not think MS would "drop" any language for .NET as it tries to be everything to everyone. Does not seem like it would take that many resources to keep the language where it is for years to come. Guess Java people are more comfortable just moving to C# :)

      Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: OpenID/CardSpace - Is it time? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kevin McFarlane

        I expected it not to last long. I couldn't see it as being any more than a transitional migration tool for the few J++ apps that were around.

        W Offline
        W Offline
        WillemM
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Yes, I think that would be the one thing that J# is handy for.

        WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

          Thyme In The Country
          Interacx

          People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
          There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
          People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

          W Offline
          W Offline
          WillemM
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          I think that it's something like 5 developers are using it and are content with what the language has to offer. 5 developers is too few justify development costs, so they stop producing it. (Ok, 5 developers is indeed a bit on the extreme side, but you get my point)

          WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

            Thyme In The Country
            Interacx

            People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
            There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
            People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Maunder
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            I actually read that as "largely met their needs". It was a conversion helper, not a serious development platform. All I can say is: About time.

            cheers, Chris Maunder

            CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kevin McFarlane

              http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

              V Offline
              V Offline
              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Some of the features like java.util.zip etc are really very useful and excellent.

              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups