VB.NET -> C# ?
-
VB.NET is the devil. There, I said it.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Yup. I prefer C#. It is elegant.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
-
VB.NET is the devil. There, I said it.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
If C++ is heaven and VB.Net is hell then C# is probably purgatory.
-
I work on an app that was started by someone else in VB.NET. I hope it was the conversion to C# that causes me to still find code like: for(int i = 0; i <= myObject.Length - 1; ++ i) or, even better: int g = item.Count - 1 + 1; I find examples of both of these almost every time I wander into the guts of stuff I've not had to touch before, like some of the basic controls we suddenly decide to change after 2 years.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
Christian Graus wrote:
int g = item.Count - 1 + 1;
Well this is no help for your cause but I upgraded some custom paging code written in ASP to VB.NET.
If intPageLength <= (intTotalPages/intPageLength - 1) + 1it took me forever to fix that crap.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that." - Tommy Boy
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School) -
Yup. I prefer C#. It is elegant.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
There's nothing more frustrating than maintaining crappy code :) Elegance is in the hands of the coder. You can write efficient and elegant code in pretty much any language (VB.NET is no exception), just as you can write jibberish, inefficient code in pretty much any language (C# is no exception). Unfortunately it sounds like from this forum that VB.NET is the language of preference for hacks, which disappointingly gives the language a bad name.
-
If C++ is heaven and VB.Net is hell then C# is probably purgatory.
Amen :)
A polar bear is a bear whose coordinates has been changed in terms of sine and cosine. Personal Site
-
There's nothing more frustrating than maintaining crappy code :) Elegance is in the hands of the coder. You can write efficient and elegant code in pretty much any language (VB.NET is no exception), just as you can write jibberish, inefficient code in pretty much any language (C# is no exception). Unfortunately it sounds like from this forum that VB.NET is the language of preference for hacks, which disappointingly gives the language a bad name.
Eduardo Fandangle wrote:
Unfortunately it sounds like from this forum that VB.NET is the language of preference for hacks, which disappointingly gives the language a bad name.
The language was designed for hacks. Literally. Important design choices were made to support VB6 hacks. A bastardized upgrade to a bastardization of a bastard language. Little surprise that the hacks seem more comfortable...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
?That sounds like the kind of moment where you wish the ESC button worked.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
There's nothing more frustrating than maintaining crappy code :) Elegance is in the hands of the coder. You can write efficient and elegant code in pretty much any language (VB.NET is no exception), just as you can write jibberish, inefficient code in pretty much any language (C# is no exception). Unfortunately it sounds like from this forum that VB.NET is the language of preference for hacks, which disappointingly gives the language a bad name.
-
Eduardo Fandangle wrote:
Unfortunately it sounds like from this forum that VB.NET is the language of preference for hacks, which disappointingly gives the language a bad name.
The language was designed for hacks. Literally. Important design choices were made to support VB6 hacks. A bastardized upgrade to a bastardization of a bastard language. Little surprise that the hacks seem more comfortable...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
If C++ is heaven and VB.Net is hell then C# is probably purgatory.
Pascal Ganaye wrote:
C++ is heaven and VB.Net is hell
VB.NET might be hell - I can't comment on that. But C++ is certainly not heaven. Its more like the treadmill of everyday life: Somtimes fun and really exiting, somtimes making you mad, but most of the time just plain boring and repetitive.
Failure is not an option - it's built right in.