Stop whining
-
Dont talk to this infadel, One day he will be begging you for a drop of water on his tounge when he is burning in hell! :rolleyes:
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I have never heard anyone but a leftist use the expression "moral superiority".
Sure, because that would be in response to someone "claiming moral superiority" not someone using the expression, right? But at least you answered and no I don't have any actual quotes so.... unless I find one or more ( I know they exist ) you have a legitimate complaint.
led mike
Frankly, the left seems far more committed to implementing a moral agenda than the right does. All the right wants is to have an equal voice in defining morality for our society. The left wants an exclusive right to define it. Just consider abortion or gay rights, the conservatives are far more compromising on those issues than the left is. The lefties are the true moral absolutists in our society.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Frankly, the left seems far more committed to implementing a moral agenda than the right does. All the right wants is to have an equal voice in defining morality for our society. The left wants an exclusive right to define it. Just consider abortion or gay rights, the conservatives are far more compromising on those issues than the left is. The lefties are the true moral absolutists in our society.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Yeah I know... "you feel harmed" by what other people do in the privacy of thier homes. Yeah I know... we have laws about 18 year old and 17 year old. Yes we have an arbitrary line of 18 where we put the "children" and have laws to protect them. I have two questions about that: 1) How is a law defined to protect children compare with you wanting a law because you feel harmed by what the consenting adult couple 2 blocks down the street are doing in the privacy of their home? 2) Don't you think we have proof beyond a doubt that children need protection from adult predators?
led mike
-
Frankly, the left seems far more committed to implementing a moral agenda than the right does. All the right wants is to have an equal voice in defining morality for our society. The left wants an exclusive right to define it. Just consider abortion or gay rights, the conservatives are far more compromising on those issues than the left is. The lefties are the true moral absolutists in our society.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Stan Shannon wrote:
The lefties are the true moral absolutists in our society.
It's a strange quirk of human nature. Those oh-so-nuanced persons who decry/denounce the concept of objective truth (or morality, or ..., etc) tend to be absolutists, especially when they're in a position to force or bully others to bend to their wills.
-
Yeah I know... "you feel harmed" by what other people do in the privacy of thier homes. Yeah I know... we have laws about 18 year old and 17 year old. Yes we have an arbitrary line of 18 where we put the "children" and have laws to protect them. I have two questions about that: 1) How is a law defined to protect children compare with you wanting a law because you feel harmed by what the consenting adult couple 2 blocks down the street are doing in the privacy of their home? 2) Don't you think we have proof beyond a doubt that children need protection from adult predators?
led mike
led mike wrote:
How is a law defined to protect children compare with you wanting a law because you feel harmed by what the consenting adult couple 2 blocks down the street are doing in the privacy of their home?
Because that is how the country was intentionally designed to work - social policies in the hands of the people at the local level.
led mike wrote:
Don't you think we have proof beyond a doubt that children need protection from adult predators?
Who gets to define "child"?
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
I just went back to see what he has posted since last night, so I'd know what to vote as spam the next time round, and most of his messages have been removed. :doh:
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
David Wulff wrote:
I just went back to see what he has posted since last night, and most of his messages have been removed.
:laugh: Oh, how thoughtful! You just can't get enough. I'll bet you want more goodies. :laugh:
See subject.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
led mike wrote:
How is a law defined to protect children compare with you wanting a law because you feel harmed by what the consenting adult couple 2 blocks down the street are doing in the privacy of their home?
Because that is how the country was intentionally designed to work - social policies in the hands of the people at the local level.
led mike wrote:
Don't you think we have proof beyond a doubt that children need protection from adult predators?
Who gets to define "child"?
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
So now we are back to not answering questions? You were the one that made that comparison and now you can't explain it? NO forget "can't" you don't even try, you purposely avoid the questions, just like the whore politicians we all complain about.
led mike
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
The lefties are the true moral absolutists in our society.
It's a strange quirk of human nature. Those oh-so-nuanced persons who decry/denounce the concept of objective truth (or morality, or ..., etc) tend to be absolutists, especially when they're in a position to force or bully others to bend to their wills.
-
Ilíon wrote:
especially when they're in a position to force or bully others to bend to their wills.
WTF are you talking about? Stan is always advocating doing exactly that! :omg::wtf: Oh it's ilion.... never mind
led mike
-
Ilíon wrote:
especially when they're in a position to force or bully others to bend to their wills.
WTF are you talking about? Stan is always advocating doing exactly that! :omg::wtf: Oh it's ilion.... never mind
led mike
-
Ilíon wrote:
especially when they're in a position to force or bully others to bend to their wills.
WTF are you talking about? Stan is always advocating doing exactly that! :omg::wtf: Oh it's ilion.... never mind
led mike
-
See subject.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
David Wulff wrote:
See subject.
Huh? The subject of your post was empty. :confused: Just as its author is. :laugh:
Ilíon wrote:
:confused:
At least you are prepared to admit it now. That is the first step to dealing with any problem.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
Ilíon wrote:
:confused:
At least you are prepared to admit it now. That is the first step to dealing with any problem.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk