VC++.Net
-
If i write a program in UNMANAGED VC++ 7.0 using ATL 7.0 and\or MFC 7.0, do I have to install the .Net framework or can I just supply the required ATL\MFC DLL's to the users machine? Is installing the framework just for Microsoft's CLR?
If its unmanaged you don't need the framework; only when you cross into managed code do you need the framework on the users machine. James Simplicity Rules!
-
If i write a program in UNMANAGED VC++ 7.0 using ATL 7.0 and\or MFC 7.0, do I have to install the .Net framework or can I just supply the required ATL\MFC DLL's to the users machine? Is installing the framework just for Microsoft's CLR?
Ollie wrote: If i write a program in UNMANAGED VC++ 7.0 using ATL 7.0 and\or MFC 7.0, do I have to install the .Net framework No, you dont have to. Ollie wrote: can I just supply the required ATL\MFC DLL's to the users machine? Yes, that's what you should do :-) Nish
The posting stats are now in PDF:- http://www.busterboy.org/codeproject/ Feel free to make your comments. Updated - May 04th, Saturday
-
If i write a program in UNMANAGED VC++ 7.0 using ATL 7.0 and\or MFC 7.0, do I have to install the .Net framework or can I just supply the required ATL\MFC DLL's to the users machine? Is installing the framework just for Microsoft's CLR?
Ollie the use of the word UNMANAGED implies deviant behavior, Many of us are calling it 'normal' programming now. Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me :-)
-
Ollie the use of the word UNMANAGED implies deviant behavior, Many of us are calling it 'normal' programming now. Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
More about me :-)
With the advent of .NET, normality got inversed Nish
The posting stats are now in PDF:- http://www.busterboy.org/codeproject/ Feel free to make your comments. Updated - May 04th, Saturday
-
If its unmanaged you don't need the framework; only when you cross into managed code do you need the framework on the users machine. James Simplicity Rules!
-
Yes. If your application uses both; the framework has to be installed. Something that just came to mind though. If you have it set so it can *optionally* load the managed code (ie it loads the managed code on demand and doesn't have anything about the managed code compiled aside from a GUID), then the framework could possibly be an option for the client as well... But if they decide to use it they will need the framework. James Simplicity Rules!
-
BTW, hopefully this time next year or the year after we can assume that many will have the framework installed so the fact there is a 20MB download won't be as much of an issue. James Simplicity Rules!
-
BTW, hopefully this time next year or the year after we can assume that many will have the framework installed so the fact there is a 20MB download won't be as much of an issue. James Simplicity Rules!
The redistributable is already part of windows update :-) Nish
The posting stats are now in PDF:- http://www.busterboy.org/codeproject/ Feel free to make your comments. Updated - May 04th, Saturday
-
The redistributable is already part of windows update :-) Nish
The posting stats are now in PDF:- http://www.busterboy.org/codeproject/ Feel free to make your comments. Updated - May 04th, Saturday
End users, using windows update?!?!?! That'll be the day.... ;P The problem with windows security problems isn't the problems its that stupid users don't patch their computers up to get rid of the problems. This is non-existant in the *nix community because almost everyone who uses it knows about security problems and patches them ASAP. James Simplicity Rules!